I’m used to it already.
ZTZ99A, VT-4A1
CAS ordnance for J-10A, JF-17, JH-7A.
Have seen “not a bug” for all of them, and a lot of times it is very unreasonable.
1 Like
Many Chinese players don’t use the site, and they just silently support options that strengthen China as voters. I can only do what I can. I think it would be better if more people could express their displeasure here.
While this is true and I support it, I do urge them to be kind to others and try to keep some beliefs to themselves.
Because this is a global forum, and no longer only Chinese people. You have people from everywhere that play War Thunder on here.
4 Likes
Though I doubt this part, this should be HQ-17A(the wheeled vehicle)'s function
Is this the HQ-17 thread now
1 Like
I am very glad that the tracked version was added. It would be worse on wheels.
Anyways, this is Chinese Flanker thread.
Let’s not crowd it with HQ-17 discussion.
Smin say, we don’t get anything in air in this update. 😣😖😫😩😩😩😩😩😭😭
We need to push them to move the J-11A down to 13.3 at the very least.
Both the J-11 and J-11A haven’t received their unique cockpit RWR which is also very weird and it’s LITERALLY a SPO-15.
1 Like
I could barely accept this。。。。。
1 Like
J-11A should be in the folder with J-11 and have 13.3. It is no better than the jf-17, and in many ways even worse. Honestly, I don’t want a J-11B, I want a J-15. He’s too handsome and cool.
1 Like
Look at this bully. I can feel his aggression right now. We need it, especially since we already have an almost ready-made model. Change the Su-33 a little bit and make a new camouflage. I really hope that he will come to us sooner than J-11B.
J-15 has exact same air frame as su33 no?
The model of the J-11B is also ready-made, at least gaijin should give us the J-11B.
1 Like
The J-15 would likely come the same time as the F/A-18C sometime next year and presumably this upcoming January.
We better get some nasty ordinances on this thing or I’ll be pretty disappointed, like later PL-12 variants and the PL-8B.
The J-15 is a derivative of the T-10K-3 unfinished Su-33 prototype that the Chinese bought from the Ukrainian
From what I understand, from @BBCRF says, it’s the exact same air frame, with only updates electronics, and most if not all weight savings are from electronics. Just want to know if there were composites in the original j-15, not the b or t version
Yes, there were, the aircraft was built using j-11b technologies
1 Like
As in, there were composites, or it is the same air frame?
It used composites. There are many photos of j-15 aircraft on the Internet without camouflage, the composite parts are clearly visible. Its body is very similar to the Su33. Cousin