You don’t do any of that. All you do is pretend to be sided with people only to backstab your exact conclusion on the very next topic.
Or just be an annoyance to OPs. Choose at will.
You are hopeless
@PyroAddict
I’ve never pretended in my life.
I’ve been behind every F-15 fix, either directly reporting or testing. Ordnance limits and flight models.
I’ve been the primary tester for Rafale and Typhoon bug reporters.
So on and so forth.
I make typing mistakes, and I acknowledge those mistakes.
just block him no point talking to him all he does is derail threads with false statements
@Alpharius11348 attempting to derail the topic and tell others to block everyone that isn’t Russian.
“There’s no point talking to NATO mains.”
Disgusting.
Not a surprise tbh.
My post was meant to be a healthy discussion to bring improvements to the game, but you ended up creating a smoke screen to defend something that doesn’t even exist in the game.
5 Likes
And I showed my support for your post.
Also I only defended the reality that SPAA is useless and we need Python 5 SPYDER equivalent SPAA added to War Thunder.
Glad you noticed he has a noticeable skill on gaslighting. And hope everyone else also notice.
1 Like
@PyroAddict
“Gaslighting is when you support Samantha, acknowledge their feelings, perspectives, and value them as an equal; the more you support Samantha the more of a gaslighter you are.”
No ones ever told you to shut the f%$k up and it shows.
Alvis, the sheer fact you pretend that Russia is mid at best while having the best SPAA/AGM/IR and arguably the second best ARH is just as glaring evidence that you’re at the very least a hypocrite or a certified gaslighter.
And judging how you supposedly think NATO and the US are as fine as they can be on multiple posts i’ve seen, you’re just a shameful gaslighter. And i’m glad that even Russian mains acknowledge it to some level.
And remember everyone: When the new Anti-Air systems arrive, and Russia once again gets the best of the pack, remember this: this guy will defend its performance to the bitter end, arguing the most incomprehensible bs.
2 Likes
Here’s what I did say:
“Su-30SM and Su-34 are OP. They are unkillable CAS. There is no SPAA in War Thunder in any tech tree capable of dealing with them.”
“Prior to Hammer’s addition, Kh-38MT was the best IR AGM in the game.”
“Their SPAA is good against GBU CAS, while GBU CAS is unkillable to NATO SPAA.”
“Soviet tanks are competitive, and equivalent to all other tech trees. No tanks are OP above others at 12.0.”
“SPAA is suffering, and we need SPYDER in the game with Python 5s, as well as equivalents for all tech trees.”
“NATO tanks are at least competitive, with a number of them being slightly more powerful than other tech trees.”
All statements I’ve made on the forum and Discord, never saying anything else.
And the fact whenever you come across NATO players your posts accuse them of gaslighting after they say Su-30SM is OP, and Kh-38MT is OP, it’s obvious you get upset when people call Su-30SM and Kh-38 OP.
Thanks for warning us that you’ll defend Pantsir to the bitter end.
For some reason this playerbase never realized that the IRL Russian multi vehicle anti air systems are just as good if not better than their NATO counterparts.
1 Like
I’ve never seen you arguing against any Russian main. Though i’ve seen you fightin’ against me and basically everyone claiming ground NATO stuff underperforms, in my case, it was for a technicism over the penning mms between the DM53 and M829A2.
You picked your personality trait: today you’re a NAFO.
Probably you’ll return to your classic programming tomorrow and pretend that NATO is OP and players are the issue, agreeing with basically the most visceral NATO haters in this place.
1 Like
NATO “sadly” focused on Patriot like systems and less on SHORAD.
@PyroAddict
I’ve argued against dozens of Russian mains in my life, most on Discord, but at least 7 on the forums itself.
I’ve never said NATO is OP, that’s the same as saying nation bias exists which I’ve always said nation bias doesn’t exist.
I’ve agreed with zero NATO hating posts on the forum.
My “personality trait” has never changed; I’m an ADHD autistic man that makes thousands of typing errors that partially causes misunderstandings between myself and others.
I apologize if my previous posts were hard to read, I make typing errors, more in my past.
I’d prefer you and I be friends if we can be.
It’s a trap, psychologically this person can only be friendly with people who agree with him/her
And that’s fair enough, it was part of their doctrine, and if it’s true, so be it.
But so the AIM-120 was superior to the R-77 variants. The point is, most of the tradeoffs on Ground or Air docrines are nullified by the artificial balance Gaijin tried to make, to the point its unrecognizable.
Today Russia gets a pass on realistically losing Air superiority because they get the optimal range to engage, and furthermore they get a powerful enough SPAA to counter enemy CAS and CAP.
Even their long range systems like the S-300 or 400 will be just as good ingame.
Also I don’t think that NATO will have any similiar systems like the Kub or Buk in lower brs.