Russia is decades ahead in ground where it’s almost never on both sides. NATO is decades ahead in air where it’s always on both sides. If you could think past your next meal you’d recognize this is part of the evidence that bias is real, not the opposite.
Not sure why you’re saying i “litterly” can’t name one since I did say the Flanker has an edge at short range. It’s also got the longest range IR in the game by far with no equivalent. So if you count on your fingers that’s two. Missile count, three.
Litterly grippen veichle litterly rafael exells exept whos rusisan
Kinda hard to type on a Phone, but whatever, anyways please explain how russia is ahead in ground when it doesnt even get t-14 armata which entered service in 2014? How come every single other nation gets its best tank yet russia still does not have it? How is the air always on both sides if Russia gets stomped? litterally you lost at short range combat to your friend 1-4 as you said so are you a bad player or what? The Ir missle gets flared super easily and most Nato jets get MAW so how is it a advantage when you just flare it? Tell me last time when it killed someone when a r77 wouldnt? Missle count above 8 doesnt matter, tell me the last time you shot 12 missles in air rb without landing
Once again, off of your own ancedotal evidence. I could make the same argument with the battles I’ve played, that’s why I said from my experience instead of pretending it’s fact. This goes both ways my dude. And my most played nation in ground is either Sweden or Japan, I’m still waiting for the Type 10/TKX to get its real armor now that we see things like the 2A7/122B+. I have a ton of matches in Russia because I was a garbage-tier premium baby that was still learning the game. (My most played vehicles say it all lol.) Also gonna let you in on a secret… you can outrange a Pantsir with Mavericks or kill them with GNSS bombs. I do believe the ADATS and Tor/FlaRakRad should be not artifically nerfed anymore. (But I have a feeling that the real reason missiles the missiles on the latter two rotate in the air after launch so slowly has to do with the crappy servers not being able to handle it). But when it comes to ground AA, the only options for the future that have potential are multi-piece systems like the Patriot System S2/3/400 except for something like a Humvee with a AIM-120
The F-16 wins the fight if they keep their speed over 100 knots and it’s guns only. A bit after the Berlin wall went down, they did some mock dogfights against East Berlin Mig-29s and learned about the menace that are thrust vectoring missiles and HMD.
For the SMT, aside from bleeding speed in game like a Hornet does irl, it’s also missing upgraded engines.
And they just did the SU- 27 dirty… one of the most maneuverable fights of its time and it’s a giant airbrake. A lot of people call it “fixed” because the instructor doesn’t try to do a cobra the moment you think about using the elevator, but the rate and AOA are still lackluster…
You say that like the AIM-95 and the VTAS III HMS never existed, It’s a pity they were both canceled in late '75. The Former due to the AIM-9L & AIM-7F offering a good enough increase in range, and being somewhat less expensive, due to being able to reuse existing Sidewinder / Sparrow infrastructure and stocks / components.
and the Latter due to Weight and Center of Gravity issues being exacerbated by Bleeding edge fighters upping performance from ~7.5G to 9G magnifying pilot strain.
Yeah sure. Better keep autocorrect turned on since you can’t spell
Please explain how russia is ahead in ground when it doesnt even get t-14 armata which entered service in 2014
“Please explain how US is ahead in air when they don’t have the F-35 which entered service in 2015”
I just didn’t have full real controls on because they’re a pain to switch in and out of.
R73 is not easily flareable at close range and/or rear aspect
R73 has TVC, R77 doesn’t. WEZ is very different.
A pattern over thousands of battles is more than anecdotal evidence unless the MM treats certain players differently.
Pantsir can’t be outranged with Mavs unless you misrepresent its effective range or cook up some unrealistic scenario where tgt stays stillfor 3 minutes. And it can shoot down both anyway.
Talking about dogfight then western FM are superior to what the soviet have ? R73 is barely a problem if you stop sucking and get good , if you want to just preflare. For all the praise R73 get it is heavily held back by the worst FM in the game from the soviet. If you merging with a su27/mig29 and die to that missile while having more CMs than your enemy then not even god can help you with this
Brub really pull that “nationality” when can’t talk back. Have to raise the R73 quality in a AMRAAM meta. Dying to a R73 against one of the worst FM in the game. Mentally ill at it peak and mam please, im not chinese or taiwanese
Maybe because in the game jets are still around late Cold War era / early modern era while tanks are the newest models ? America gets the best tank they have , so does Germany but Russia ?? Noo never !!!
So you wouldn’t even go full real controls during a normal game and euro can also cobra and aim9m just like the su27sm can cobra and r73
