You’re talking like someone who has actually never used these vehicles, it is very obvious.
1 Like
And a 3-5km radius dead zone of uselessness due to not holding a close-in system like the Tunguska for example.
Face pantsir.
Good thing Pantsir not to be at this compressed a BR. 12.0 meets 11.0. What a joke.
This is Ark’s experience in the TOR-M1
STOP COMMENTING ON BALANCE IF YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT IT’S LIKE TO USE SAID VEHICLE YOU WANT TO BALANCE.
1 Like
I can say the same as you with ITO-90M and Flarakrad if you think they are better than HQ-17 you ever try one?
I’m not saying anything about those vehicles, am I? You’re the one trying to say how the TOR-M1 is to use. You know nothing about the vehicle, and its downsides. I’m simply pointing this out.
I’ll be another voice telling you to stop; the Tor is horrible.
You have the reading comprehension of a child my post was literally chastising him for complaining about russian vehicles including their tanks despite playing the leopard 2A7
Also pretty much every nation bar britain and israel have better tanks than russia ingame
The TORS leave a smoke trail the size of belgium when they fire and theyre mostly incapable of hitting low flying targets or targets within 5km its not a good SPAA you’d have to be delusional to think so
Are you actually kidding me you’re putting the autocannon up as the reason why its better jesus christ nearly 40k games played and thats the best you can come up with as to why having missiles with half the speed and less explosive mass is better its because you get a dinky 20mm thats never gonna kill anybody with more than 70 IQ
Here is the formula: If someone goes on about how good the Tor is, and starts listing specs, and doesn’t mention how horrible things like the smoke trails are - I know they have never used the vehicle.
1 Like
Have fun pulling your energy and life away in a gen2.
Fun fact: Pantsirs can pull and kill whoever is not pulling enough
Gen 2?
As in your flying gen 2 jets at 11.0/12.0?
No wonder your complaining, get a BR Specific jet instead of throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks.
You just clowned your own arguments.
4 Likes
I own the pantsir and ive faced the pantsir and the people i squad with own and face the pantsir and none of us have any issues dodging pantsir missiles except for if you’re in the Tornado the things a brick
I literally cant tell what you even said
So you can fly around the battlefield until you get shot down by a Su-34. The point is that you, like the Su-34, cannot hit targets without fear of SPAA.
1 Like
This topic is a reminder of why I trust in Gaijin’s method of balancing - as flawed as it can sometimes be, it is much better than the ‘balance’ efforts being pushed by many of those in the community.
4 Likes
I already created a topic here about the imbalanced Su-34, the topic was closed, they told me that I was playing incorrectly. Meanwhile, Gaijin secretly nerfed Aim-120 and AGM-65D and G. And the game returned to the Soviet shooting range.
How would you get shot down by an SU-34 it only gets R-77 and its airframe bleeds all of its speed trying to turn away to notch
???no none of those weapons have changed at all in the the files
ive been hit at the airfield by pantsir with no rwr warning
no lmao
brimstones should have their fnf function restored at top brs because of parity and its a manufactured flaw that isnt real
1 Like
No you haven’t post the replay
That wouldn’t be parity that would be a total shift back to NATO CAS being the best and complete powercreep they can have their FNF when gaijin implements jamming and multispectral smoke for vehicles