Same to derbies and most other foxs, and better then the aamraam? the 10 additional G difference litterly does not matter one bit since the r77 doesnt instantly turn from pylon like darter and flies straight for like 1 second
1 Like
“Most”? like what, britain is better in air rb, coastal and blue water, the only mode where russia is superior is ground rb
Shows that there is no favoritism in the game, some nations are better at certain modes then others, what russia has in cas and helis it lacks in air to air and tanks
Yeah let’s fix the abrams busted damage model, which leads to it eating way more rounds than it should. Or the driver / gunner / commander getting hit by a 152mm and being fine is fair.
I think it’s Russian bias
1 Like
So I have sent this in this thread before…
But if you take a look at this:
The R-77 should be slightly better than amraam
Barely keep up like everyone
Yeah bro forget royal navy rule the seas for hundred years and know how to build warships and surprised why Russia can’t complete with them
Lack in tanks lol compare to who Sweden? Everyone lack in tanks compare to Sweden
Ofc it should but the American main hivemind cope every single time shit doesn’t go their way , like they coped their way to abrams buff and f15e spaceship engines
1 Like
y-you secretly want more russian bias
I’m as surprised as you that they’ve let me destroy your feelings like that, since you’re the protagonists and all. But many of my posts were deleted by staff, if that’s any consolation.
From an exterior viewpoint, your posts are being removed because they are frankly insane or in breach of the guidelines, you have hardly been civil in this thread or any other to do with soviet/russian vehicles and frequently assault character not statement, all of this combined with the fact that you’re a known US apologist with little care for anyone else in the sense of balance or parity. Take a minute to read some of the abhorrent comments made before whining about post deletion.
6 Likes
I’m fine with my posts being deleted and I’m not a US apologist. Not even a US main.
I just recognize that they’re treated like crap in this game and I’m disgusted that so many people think it’s still not bad enough.
little care for anyone else in the sense of balance or parity.
Couldn’t be further from the truth. In fact I thought US was too strong before the Pantsir with the F16C, but still below Russia.
But anyway, probably no point even defending myself now that you’ve seen so many likes on posts criticizing me, too far gone.
Compared to Sweden , Germany , USA , France , Japan
Can we delve into this point since i’m generally curious as to how the tech tree with the largest lineups, most well rounded vehicles, consistent additions and relevancy in all areas of the game is treated ‘disgustingly’?
3 Likes
My god, we agree on something else??? There’s a pattern here… am I becoming… a British main?? Nah Jk.
Nice to see you though. Almost have my Conquerer. Any tips? (In pm).
But I think Excalibur may be in dire need of a padded room.
2 Likes
It’s frustrating to not just lose but get crushed over and over by casuals carried by bias. That’s all it is
We’ve been over it in this thread from many different angles… Having many vehicles doesn’t mean anything. The helis are worthless, the AA is leagues below where it should be at, the Abrams are much easier to kill than their counterparts, their CAS is countered by the Pantsir too effectively… Really the only good vehicle at US top tier is the HSTVL. Everything else is inferior to most tanks except the Ariete.
Reasonable ways to fix the balance would be to give the Abrams Trophy, nerf the ERA on Russian tanks or buff US rounds, add the Longbow Hellfire as a simple F&F missile that can get fooled by smoke, buff the dispersion on the Apache chaingun, and add SLAMRAAMs or maybe Hawk SAM. 30% winrate is abysmal and cannot be the players’ fault alone, especially when it’s the same on EU and NA servers.
Reverse speed is nice but that’s all they got. They’re perma stuck with the slowest reload at top tier, their vertical gun handling is crap and they tend to have bigger LFPs.
I might change my opinion then.
Don’t get your hopes up too much, as Type 81 will make your TOR irrelevant at <7-8km ranges against aircraft, and above that range you aren’t hitting anything non-afk anyways.
@RemiliaScarlet
I like people that praise Tunguska like it’s some sort of a wonder weapon at 10.7, when in reality the missile starts tweaking out post 4-5km so at that point you aren’t hitting anything non-afk.
1 Like
this alone is enough to tell how biased your opinion is
1 Like
another one of “on paper it said it is very OP so i must assume it is OP without listening to others opinion or experience it myself firsthand” type of people. honestly at this point with this bias your opinion doesnt even matter
Go buy one and play it yourself. after 200 battle we will ready to hear your opinion until then. it is all biased opinion about non-existed soviet bias
Ka50 players would change their tune real quick if they got smacked out of the air at 5km by a 2S38 every time they climb straight up for their point and click adventure on other players.
In fact I’m sure it won’t be long before they start calling for nerfs on the RDF, if that’s not the case already.