Schützenpanzer Puma IFV: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly. Part 2!

Some pictures of the turret-roof armour:

Spoiler



1 Like

A Source could be very neat or if you want you can add it in my Report as a comment.😀
btw the link to the Report: Puma IFV (All) Missing Turret Roof Composite

Another Report but this is about the Rear side being 15mm of RHA even though PSM states it can resist 14.5mm API (~40mm)
Puma IFV (All) Insufficient Rear Protection

2 Likes
Zusammenfassung


You can overpressure the tank with ~1kg tnt onto the Driver

Edit:
MUSS reacts to 105mm HEATFS

Zusammenfassung


1 Like

“our team cannot reproduce this bug!”

1 Like

Would it be correct this way?
Spall-Liner → hull(15mm?) → AMAP-B(Picture?) → ERA/CLARA

Zusammenfassung

2 Likes

is it what she wouldve wanted?

Im pretty sure its missing that armor entirely
Bild_2026-05-30_233922640

The worst part is, I would lie when I say it would surprise me :(
Anyway, source of my Pic

1 Like

So since the the current Side Armor is roughly 37.5mm (with all layers) which isnt really enough to stop 14.5mm API (39mm)

Also, more ERA?

Zusammenfassung


1 Like

The Lower Part is Composite not ERA on the Second Image

Also in the Snow Picture?
Because looks 1/1 like the ERA Blocks

Looks more like ERA

Could it be the Composite sits on top of ERA?

Here is the Proof that its Composite on the Second Picture.

1 Like

Still SuS :3

1 Like

Currently making a Report on the Side Armor being way to Weak.



Just 10mm of RHA Equivalency btw :)

2 Likes

The longer I look at the IRL pic, the more it looks like the armor (AMAP-B?) is really missing.