I copied the wrong source, very sorry
I remembered that it had already been suggested in the past. Maybe I’m confused with the SM.86. Anyway +1.
2 Likes
The SM.86 has in fact been suggested, the SM85, being the weak twin wasn’t
2 Likes
Akhem, I found drawings showing how flaps/airbakes works on S.85 and this is something else :O
Edit: whole page about flaps:
3 Likes
Fascinating.
1 Like
Also SM.85 has 3 versions: SM.85, SM.85B and SM.85C
More revelations when I get some translation
Edit: C was a recon variant with 7,7 instead of 12,7
1 Like
Difference between standard and B versions is:
SM.85:
Piaggio P.VII 16(geared for 1600m) <500Hp
Pleated engine covers:
3 fuel tanks with 1045liters
SM.85B:
Piaggio P.VII 35(geared for 3500m) <500Hp
Smooth engine covers:
4 fuel tanks with 1078liters
Bigger nose window for finding targets
4 Likes
Amazing work, wow. The flap configuration is truly fascinating. Thank you.
3 Likes
I can send you source, but there are nothing interesting Apart from this flaps
2 Likes
Send it anyway thanks.
3 Likes
I found more interesting things about this aircraft:
-
Bomb bay does not have an opening mechanism, instead, the doors are held closed by elastic ropes and open under force of bomb arm swinging outwards with payload
-
Undercarage was too weak to survive landing with 500 and 800kg bombs onboard
-
Airplane was very stable and agile, allowing for very tight formations and aerobatic maneuvers:
Source:
3 Likes
But with week engines and a structure that bended because of moisture and heat cycles
2 Likes
Exackly!
3 Likes
awesome!
3 Likes
BANANA!!!
3 Likes
not the best but… will work
3 Likes
It’s a shame it’s slow, it would have been great to have interceptors the slip in this thing. +1
2 Likes
Suggestion update:
corrected a lot of info and made it much more clear
2 Likes