SAAF JAS-39C Technical Data and Discussion

This image

884dfc22351b88b74d232726fbf02dfa

Zoomed in

You can see the BOP/B (BOY 402) mounted together with a BOL pod and a missile on the outer pylon. The inner pylon i can only make out a BOL pod on.

Just to be clear, i don’t mean that it can be mounted on inner and outer pylons at the same time. I probably should have used “or” instead of “and” perhaps to make that clearer (If that is what you were questioning).
I have yet to find anything that proves them being mounted on inner and outer pylons simultaneously but i am looking and will add the info if found.

Edit:
I might just have found it! (though it might not be enough)

Both


Screenshot 2024-06-27 124702

Its a bit hidden but the “curve” upwards at the back of the pylon is only present if the BOP/B module is installed.

Regular pylon back end

Yeah I don’t see your logic here, they are already available outboard on all Gripen C models, your report doesn’t have any justification for them inboard or that Gripen A carried them .

just edited my answer.
also, i didn’t know they were available on the C in game.
If they can only be carried on one set of pylons at a time then there is not really a need for them to exist on both unless the addition is limited by ordinance.

Edit:
oh, i think i see my mistake in the report now, i mistook one of the images as an inner pylon at the beginning of making the report and corrected it but never corrected the last bit of info.

ZA Gripen C


HU Gripen C (actually doesn’t have them)

SW Gripen C

I have made a report to swap the low quality no texture BOL on Gripen for the CRL/BOL that the Sea Harrier FA2 now carries;

Low quality no texture BOL

High quality, textured CRL/BOL;

Same rail on a Gripen;

9 Likes

Nice!

Any word on the MAW for gripen?
or any of the reports for that matter.

From the ESTL pod?

And internal.

the system includes means to discover threats from radar, analyze the signals, validate them against known data, present the threats to the pilot and take proper counteractions. These counteractions include, for instance, electronic jamming against radar and radar-guided missiles, flares against IR-guided missiles and chaff against radar and radar-guided missiles

I do not see anything about MAWS, if i read this correctly it could identify missile using plane radar, compare it to the database and tell the pilot what it think it is or it is simply a RWR description.

and then take the appropriate counteractions. If the “threats” described aren’t also missiles then why would the need for automatic IR-flares and chaff against missiles be there?

Tbh, imo it is just a fancy way of saying it has them.

what do you mean?

it says that they EW system takes proper counteractions, of which includes flares and chaff against missiles.
i don’t see how you read it differently but i’m no stranger to be proven wrong.

I jsut read it like that, also i do not see any maws on the ew
image

i also just found this, however its a bit inconclusive on the specifics of MAW. BUT it clearly states that the system can deploy flares and chaff automatically.

This is even better, from SAAB https://www.defenceiq.com/content-auto-download/5b04b95f97533d72c14ff28a
page 5:


Screenshot 2024-06-27 142555

1 Like

interesting

@Gunjob Do you want me to make a new separate report for internal MAW (and slave CM to MAW) as i have now found more sources?

Do you know whats the thing of that version?
image

This is a similar press release and to me that doesn’t read as a MAW at all. It basically says “we have an E-war suite and various other countermeasures”.