Probably not, since the airframes and internal electronics are so very very different. They might still take it as a suggestion, but imo, honestly, i doubt it.
The image was before used to argue the adding of belly mounted mk.82 type paveway IV
Updated
changed label for dual pylons
1 Like
Counterpoint:
I tried this one as well but it looked so worned up, especially on nozzle section.
It looks quite nice tho.
This guy (link below) is really good for especially modifying the cockpit. Tho, the MFDs are still unreadable. Do you guys know if there is a way for me to modify the MFD resolution manually?
any updates on the wings ?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pwKul9rg1GJ6?comment=bqvfbLRGXbfC9V98GaJ37sFh
Forward for review 👀
Hopefully it gets somewhere.
4 Likes
“forwarded for review” its been like this since the release of the update, im tired boss
4 Likes
It’s been wrong since the first gripen released
That is probably the dumbest hot take ive seen in a while
not saying the f16am is bad but it is in no way better that a gripen e except for matchmaking
cant deny that all the missing features if implemented would make the gripen e much better but after flying it for more than 100 games in air rb and grb cant really call shit
feels much better than the su 30sm and is better than it mostly with some exceptions likes missile variety and missile count
oh and also the rwr in the sm is quite horrible (± 30°) compared the gripen (± 45°)
it is not that hard to play as you make it seem to be
1 Like
I just prefer the F16 playstyle to the gripen E, better matchmaker is a huge factor but also how the F16 flies feels better imo, additionally fi4st person with the AM is just infinitely more tolerable than the Gripen E.
45 cm monster
1 Like
Hey i love it
It’s finally been approved! I look forward to seeing the E-Gripen’s accuracy improve even further.
7 Likes
5 Likes
It’s been accepted.
Now if only they would bother to fix the rwr, cms, maws, and all the rest of the rubbish they got working for everything else effectively immediately upon the update going live.
5 Likes
MAWS is still broken and doesn’t slave chaff leaving it functionally useless. Got to love it.
They really shouldn’t have bothered to add it if they were going to leave it in this state.
@Gunjob Generally don’t care to ping you folk, but the fact this has been left like this is somewhat infuriating, especially given the bug reports seem to be rejected on the grounds of “just cos” if they aren’t just ignored for the sake of it. Is there any inclination for this blatant travesty to be fixed or are we just shit out of luck because it’s a gripen and an afterthought? Typhoon and Rafale both maintain this functionality, and it should be present on Gripen. It is incredibly irritating.
For clarity: Gripen E currently lacks MAWS slaving functionality present on both Rafale and Typhoon in that it will only fire flares and never chaff.
7 Likes