Rockets have too much random spread thus not skill based. They are well suited for dealing with SPAA though.
Thats why i can use 5 bullpups on the A4E and those are pretty good unlike the nords. So even more kills
1 Like
use your five bullpups.
Then why do you keep talking about walleyes and a 2,000lb bomb?
Eh depends on when i pull CAS, if i know spaa is up i normally pull agm 62A, lets me stay away and it self guides. 2000lb is great for clearing a cap. Bullpupnis better if there isnt too much spaa. Nice for cleaning house when they have a few guys running around in the open.
Why bullpups? you could carry 3 1,000lb bombs on the center rack alone.
You can guide them and they don’t need to hit the target direct from my experience. Guess it really depends on how you feel. I normally either pull my A4B or my A4E depending on how the match is going. I have the 3 bullpups on my A4B to use which is pretty solid.
similar bomb load was refering to the canberra which has 5x1000lb the saab105G has 4x1000lb while having CCIP and being faster
also i forget the bucc has flare pods
No sane Saab player will choose this loadout
so… what they destroying bases with? because most of them destroy bases
either way it shouldnt be 8.3, it should be 8.7 or 9.0 or the canberras should be at a lower br
SAAB 105Gs are goddamn menace in ground RB and most definitely should be up-tiered in that mode.
Fast, hard to counter with AA, can bomb you from the orbit, can drop a bomb from lower height and zoom back into the stratosphere in a split of second.
Would be understandable, but the payload it can bring and CCIP make it way too OP. Nothing with CCIP should be lower than 9.0.
Absolutely hand-held vehicle. The epitome of why a lot of people hate CAS and want it to be removed from the ground RB.
To the slightly lower extent the same goes to Alpha jet.
Had to cut quality to fit it lmao.
From orbit huh?
Also that is a 6.0 Cent MK.1 not any crazy armored mbt. The amount of cope from people is pretty unreal lmao. I made sure to drop 4 1000lb bombs because so many people seem to think this thing is an A4E but better lmao.
Misleading video, you dropped the bombs and then bumped them with your airplane before they got clear.
I didn’t bump them, ill do it again if you want but i didn’t bump them lmao.
Had to compress it so much to send lmao
Oh god i can count the fucking pixles bro.
Bomb drop segment with better quality
Youtube is taking their sweet time processing the decent quality version of my video, but it is most certainly possible to actually kill enemy vehicles from a decently high alt with CCIP drops. Despite dropping smaller bombs, the target ate one to their face. Against actual opponents, I’d be functionally immune to SPAA, barring the M247 and PGZ09. CCRP is much less accurate, for reasons your video illustrates perfectly. I’d expect the Saab 105 to be capable of the exact same performance as my Alpha Jet E.
Again the difference here is people who could play and waste most of their bombs trying to kill a target that doesnt move vs having two self guided agm 62A’s. The fact of the matter also comes down to nobody in all seriousness is going tonplay from that altitude unless you’ve got teammates who can give exact pings. Do i think the saab 105 should go to 8.7 sure, paste that it doesn’t make much sense. Its not particularly good at anti air unlike my alpha which surprisingly has replaced my g.91 for cas and anti cas.
This sort of drop is exactly the way I’d engage enemy SPAA, which tend to sit nice and still. For tanks, you can happily go lower and slower for vastly increased precision. I have experienced a Saab 105 early CAS spawn before any SPAA were spawned, and it was easily getting 3 to 4 kills per sortie, until I had to spawn a SPAA or fighter to kill it myself.
The original point the other poster made was that a Saab 105 could engage targets outside of SPAA retaliation range, which I have proven.
1 Like