its not bias or not, thus this changes alse make a great advantage for VT1 trucks and also ADATS. Its just not realistic and lack of logic. the most important is these changes are so silly and funny, and nake toptier less balanced
i changed my post and link some evidence from reddit hope u could check these new mechanism :D
radar not in the database will be seen as unknown
this is the main point that if ur flying an A-10A and there are enemies cy34 and J-10A flying above the battle field
but ur database still reamains as the one in 1977 make ur RWR full of question marks
thats silly really silly, means ur ground crew never make any update to ur plane all these years
2 Likes
Really good idea. it could make the game more playable lmao.
But actually the database could be shared on the battlefield by the data link.
So…may be ur teammate gathered these database and it could be sent to you in this game
looks better and really worth considering
If they’ve already decided they’re going to do it, it will happen. Because the majority of NATO playing people will bitch up a storm at first if this change is launched, but if it’s not going to get reversed, well, people will still play. See the introduction of drones, for instance. Big outcry, followed by … well… everyone playing anyway :)
to make russia great again
1 Like
kind of cyber Aphrodisiac
1 Like
Chinese helicopters still got nothing on their RWR .How rediculous！！！
1 Like
Yes they should
Chinese equipments are more modernized than russian ones usually
1 Like
we got drones in every country but we couldnt get same vehicles in every country so far. Drones will not lead to a huge unbalanced situation but introducing an illogical and selectively applied mechanism that primarily affects U.S.-made RWR models will greatly exacerbate the imbalance.
1 Like
I was speaking about how Gaijin more often than not just goes ahead and implements things that a) nobody asked for, and b) when “unveiled” lead to a lot of people telling them this is not a good idea, and c) will get reworked over and over to fix balance issues.
Using the drones as an example of something that ticks all of the above points; drones were revealed, people told Gaijin it’s not a good idea, drones got implemented. Then re-worked because the first iteration of drones were pretty much untouchable and were a guaranteed 2 free kills, which lead to them getting a further away air spawn, but they’re still somewhat OP due to the fact no SPAA can lock them until they’re so close that it’s pretty well guaranteed they’ve shot their 2 missiles - the only thing keeping them in check is that a) not many people will have the SP to spawn one, and the people that do will most likely spawn a plane or helicopter with more boom boom on it.
1 Like
The plane coming to the game is not the most modernized version of the SU-34.
1 Like
Almost all RWRs got the nerf, including the Russian L150.
1 Like
It feels like that scene from spongebob where squidward took his brain out and tossed it in the trash
1 Like
Why is that a NATO or PACT thing ? All RWRs are having their heads chopped off and then shot with an RPG
1 Like
Because people majorly play NATO due to PACT top tier air being s*** outside of the J10A.
1 Like
So what? All RWRs will be next to useless, regardless of nation… You cant have “state of the art” radars and missiles and RWRs that cant tell the difference between an SA10 and a Patriot… Or an F16 and an SU33… Its completely delulu logic
1 Like
I’m just saying that’s why all the complaints are centered around the nerf affecting NATO aircraft while ignoring that CN/USSR RWRs were also nerfed.
1 Like
Well, they should cope then lol…
1 Like
On what I said previously, here is a threat board for the F-18C. It uses the ALR-67(V)
Focusing on ground radars, not only can it tell the difference between completely different systems, but it can also tell the difference between the search and tracking radar of the same system for example… Its similar for other RWRs of the same time… What is gaijin smoking?
2 Likes