It’s almost like they had to remove something from a Russian jet, so now they gotta remove something for the entirety of NATO aircraft to balance it out. This change makes absolutely 0 sense. IF they want to 100% stand on this change, at least make a new modification, RWR Software Update (terrible idea, but better than having nothing I guess).
9 Likes
I’m waiting for them to announce a mechanic where you have to “Destroy 50× of X Aircraft/SPAA” to have it entered in the threat library for the plane you’re flying 😂
3 Likes
Gaijin likes to create serious problems and wants to mess with us
…Every time!!!
1 Like
As a CW-Player, i would say it is horrbile. Not that the Pantsir is already the best AA system in the game but making half of the planes not getting a warning makes it een more dangerous as it already is. I think as told there are Software updates, So why adding this bs when this is still a game and the balance between nations is already suffering.
8 Likes
Ahh yes the bias was visible but now it has a big sign lit up with christmass trees …
2 Likes
Didn’t saw the SERVAL in the list does that mean that M2K avoid that nerf?
My only concern is seeing that some rwr has lost their ability to identify sam, I don’t mind seeing that modern rwr doesn’t identify decommissioned aircraft
1 Like
Ofc its the nato RWRs that are getting nerfed
1 Like
What we have is already technically realistic enough, as its reasonable to assume the RWR Contact Database would be very in-depth and up to date with the amount of fighters we come in to contact with in Matches.
Sure its not perfectly realistic to real-life, but gaijin has proved time and time again they care about balance over realism, so who knows.
3 Likes
The only thing that’s not “realistic” is how the contacts are displayed, but that part is forgivable for ease of gameplay. Any contact that is in the database for modern RWRs will be identified, radar not in the database will be seen as unknown.
7 Likes
Exactly, but gaijin now wants go go in and not only butcher that Database, but just summarize radars that they have detected AND identified SEPERATELY to all share one Identification letter. its just such BS.
4 Likes
Right, and i too take major issue with it. Classifying SAMs as AAA rofl.
2 Likes
That’s just the distraction. This change will be made, come hell or high water. Much like recon and strike drones. Not many people thought those were a good idea (well, okay, strike drones mostly, recon drones are kind of okay) but we got the change anyway. Because the snail knows what’s best for us, obviously… (/s … big big big /s)
So yeah. Doesn’t matter folks, you can dissect the change as much as you like, you can bring evidence as much as you like, but this change is going to happen.
2 Likes
If you are going to make it realistic, make everything realistic but not out of compromise, because for example they do not put the new engines in the American F-15E when it is realistic that it has them, so do not come out with the excuse that it is not realistic
3 Likes
They cant do that because they know NATO nations would pull the russian vehicles bottom lip over their heads and tell them to swallow.
Look, the problem is that NATO RWR is just a slight advance in air RB, but in ground RB and Air SB it is very important, so balance is not a reliable excuse for this change. they never think about balance when they add KH-38MT in game, and SU34 could carry 6x KH-38MT in a row. thats crazy…
Frankly, with the change I’d be inclined to put in a negative review. Really demonstrating how little they give a shit about accuracy.
2 Likes
its really joke that cy34 is modernized but F15e is the early one, they enven give isreal a f15 equipped with 2 brand new engine, that is crazy XD
By the way its hard to out of compromise for gaijin, but we need let them know this mechanism is a big joke at all.
Yeah, its hard to put in a positive review, since this will make the toptire battle less balanced for sure
i prefer to believe they would change this mechanism for sure, these new changes are not realistic and have no logic at all, the mistake is so conspicuous. ppl playing NATO vehicles will not accept these silly changes :D
if u tried F4S, actually they changed a lot of RWR for planes before, which made me to start to research this, software could be update any time.
New Mechanism is not horriable but wrong mechanism is horriable