Didn’t say the breach mate, turret face it can go through.
No it’s literally because the Merriam Webster dictionary focuses on more colloquial usage rather than correct grammatical usage.
Aka descriptive rathar than prescriptive.
While it is pretty good for American usage, alternatives like the Oxford English Dictionary are often considered more appropriate for scholarly or historical research.
No I do not at all.
In your native tongue it may mean otherwise, however in English Perception and sight are two distinct functions, the sight, aka seeing, is what you can literally see, the physicality of it. The perception is the interpretation of said physical sight / reception.
You also used the word perception in the context as I’ve described above then rather than go and change it or can it have decided to carry on this farce.
The biological definition in English is tied to sight the action of “perception” is the brain interpretation OF the light/ images that the eyes are receiving.
Yes as the same in Spanish mate, but English is not Spanish nor your native tongue, it is it’s own distinct language.
Yes and the context in which you used that word explicitly means that your perception able to have been changed , or not, by the use of Russian vehicles, hence the question you posed.
The question you also posed is written in a way that the previous remarks related to the size of weakspots is irrelevant as your question unless rhetorical, shows that your perception (understanding / understood information relevant to the weakspot size) is capable of changing.
NOT THAT THE ACTUAL WEAK SPOTS THEMSELVES CHANGE
Need I reiterate that more¿
Most of who are passing?
1- this is not obnoxious, I’ll use your language wrong and see how you react to it.
2- This “tirade” is nothing of the sort, it’s a simple explination of language to show how you’ve misused a word, I am not angry at you at all.
As well as this, what I’ve presented to you is not that long at all as a series of pieces of broken up information.
again, your denial of how my language that I am extremely well versed in teaching works is why this has went on as long as this.
I am a “profesor en titular” and earned my position through hard work and a lot of research into my own language.
If you’d like I can give you the “most annoying English lesson you’ve ever had”.
Tank baskets in my experience especially Abrams have actually helped me survive more situations than not. Rather than penetrating straight through and killing the crew in one shot it usually allows for me to take the hit, reverse and escape, or reposition enough to fire at them with borked turret.
The leopards are slightly less forgiving than that at least the 2a5 and A6 have been, the 2A4 usually is alright.
Happens mate, use of language is important when trying to convay the correct information relevant to the point at hand.
What does this even mean?
I’ve misused nothing at all lol.
Whole ass turret ring exists for most russian MBTs bar maybe the T90M I think, but evne that has it last I chekced.
