How’s LFP, a huge piece armor, a “small weakspot”?
How’s the roof of a russian tanks, a huge piece of armor, a “small weakspot”?
How are the sides of any russian MBT, a super weak piece of crap that can be pen by anything with +60mm, a “small weakspot”?
Armor only works for people who don’t know how to aim, like it usually is.
Well of course theyre big if you compare it to a fiat 500 for example. But they are literally the smallest due to the tanks being smaller.
Spoiler
Is the concept of comparison known to you? Because no matter what you yap russian tanks have still better side armor than every other tank in the game courtesy of stupid ERA modeling. Acting like armored UFP and small weakspots are not an advantage is probably the biggest piece of russian copium.
Yeah and russia players dont since borderline everything on the average non ru tank is a weakspot so whats your point exactly outside of being obnoxious?
I know that most of NATO tanks are huge weak spots, but that doesn’t mean you can just point n click them carelessly. As a good example you can take the Abrams. Volumetric armor under the gun (not the neck), strong turret cheeks (at least 12.0 onward) and the absurdly angled ufp plate that ricochets everything.
Most of the NATO tanks have arguably artificial weak spots. Since GJN loves guestimating armor values and other stuff. And tends to fall very low for NATO things, and very high for Russian things. Which is a bit of a trend. According to Gaijin western tanks are just big and heavy for no reason, inferior western engineering.
And “you can’t on shot em!” isn’t an argument when you take them out of commission easily and can then finish them off at their leisure.
ok so playing a russian tank changes my VISUAL perception or what?
Do the weakspots magically get bigger once you play it yourself?
Or are you just talking out of your backside without thinking for a second?
You do realize that armor isn’t everything in the game? All I see when someone is moaning about Soviet tanks is about their armor, while paying no attention to the downsides of having strong armor.
Did i say anything of that? No i didnt you just yapped away, because thats the only thing you guys can. I literally said above that russian tanks are not great but reading ist hard i guess. Acting like russian tanks have nothing were they are better than the others is straight up lying.
And ofc you answer not a single question, because even you realize how exceptionally dumb that statement was.
russian tanks are very well armored and have the smallest weakspots due to being small tanks. Does that make them great? No.
? They are smaller than on comparable tanks due to the tanks being smaller. This is not about perception of a subjective opinion, its about perception of the physical model.( Perception is the process of attaining awareness or understanding of sensory information. It can also be explained as how a person feels towards something.)
That doesnt change no matter how many games you play on the tank.
Like, is my english bad? You guys dont even read the stuff you answer to properly before you waste everyones bandwith with your comments.