Explain how playing russian tanks makes their weakspots physically bigger and the armor worse.
1 Like
It makes how you percieve them change…
IT makes you realise they’re not as small as you think they are.
? They are smaller than on comparable tanks due to the tanks being smaller. This is not about perception of a subjective opinion, its about perception of the physical model.( Perception is the process of attaining awareness or understanding of sensory information. It can also be explained as how a person feels towards something.)
That doesnt change no matter how many games you play on the tank.
Like, is my english bad? You guys dont even read the stuff you answer to properly before you waste everyones bandwith with your comments.
1 Like
Are we still talking about weakspots or first date experiences?
9 Likes
War thunder players and date experiences lol
5 Likes
You know.
People do like to lie about size in both cases.
12 Likes
3 Likes
Oh trust me, i know.
" . It can also be explained as how a person feels towards something."
It literally can be changed when you play a tank mate, you’re feelings on it will inevitebly change if you play it
That means your preception of it will change lol
-
1 yes your English is bad you literally proved with your definition of perception that how you “feel” towards the small weak points will change if you use the vehicles.
-
2 I am an English teacher, I have read what you said as well as what you responded to and their response isn’t to saying “the weakpoints suddenly get bigger” if you use them.
That merely the feeling of them being so small disappears due to how often you get popped in them.
You rather than get uptight should really learn how to use the correct words in situations lol.
also as per the Oxford Dictionary
Perception : an idea, a belief or an image you have as a result of how you see or understand something
Which means, your perception of the weakspots would very much or could very much change if you bothered to use the vehicles mentioned.
Relevance to the topic?
1 Like
My perception whether russian weakspots are smaller than on other tanks does not change if i play any since its a completely objective observation based on physical size.
My perception of the impact of the size of the weakspots might but that was not the topic in the slightest. Youre completely adding a second layer that was not part of the discussion. But no problem, ill just say visual perception next time to make it easier for you.
And yeah im getting uptight if people cant even be assed to do the slightest bit of reading before commenting.
yeah ofc because necron cant be assed to read anything either. When you actually read the comment and the one before then its very clear that its about physical size not whatever the impact of the size is.
1 Like
Dont ask me, I wasnt the one that started to talk about percieving smaller things as bigger.
1 Like
No your perception of it very much can change based on if you use them or not as the definition states lol.
What even lol you’re the one who said and I quote “ok so playing russian tanks changes my perception or what?” so No I’ve not added a secondary layer to it.
Necron literally told you “yes” in response to the aformentioned question.
You realise if you leave a vague as hell statement sitting then it’s not the readers fault for miss interpreting your statement, it’s entirely you’re own doing.
As well as that if you want to say, they physically wont change size.
then say that Don’t say that your perception will or wont change if you use the tanks.
I’ve read, as I said all of it lol the last however many hundred from my last interaction.
Says the man who stated
"ok so playing russian tanks changes my perception or what?
Which in of itself changes the direction of the conversation to how you will “feel” or “percieve” said weak points if you actually bother to use the vehicles.
1 Like
Jesus christ its not vague as hell if you read the comment or the one before. The entire comment line is about size. Why on gods green earth would that suddenly change towards my feeling about the weakspots. Perception is not just the psychological definition, its a broad term describing the entire process of gathering information and the best translation for the corresponding word in my mother language. If its unclear to you maybe ask whats meant instead of going completely besides the point.
And my answer to Necron should have made it even more clear that the discussion is about visual perception and not whatever you interpret into the discussion from the sideline
1 Like
russian tanks are the only tanks at top tier where the breech isnt a weakspot and dont tell me the drivers port is a weakspot you get volumetric half the time. also relikt is to stop apfsds at an angle not dead side on and ive had a shot do nothing dead side on more often than not on t90ms and t80bvm also gaijin wont add anti ERA tipped darts but add 220mm kinetic protection on russian ERA which just doesnt seem fair
1 Like
AGain read it.
Your comment is quite literally a vague open ended question related to and I quote "ok so playing russian tanks changes my perception or what?
How is that not a vague question.
Changes your perception to how those small weakspots actually feel?
If you wanted to actually refer to the physical size of said weakspots then you have to re-write your sentence mate.
You should say, “will using them change how I perceive the physical size of them” or something to that effect.
Because and I’ll say this once more here
Your use of perception in the open ended question, is not related to size in the manner you have used it, as you didn’t refer to it at any point, you just said “ok so playing russian tanks changes my perception or what?”
This leaves no reference to the perception of the aformentioned weakspots.
Again the use of the language is hugely important.
2 points, one you shouldn’t use your mother language as a basis for reference in another language, direct translations or definitions change depending the language to langauge.
two, the definition I sent you is the B2 definition, not the psychological reference of it.
The C1 definition is
the way you notice things, especially with the senses, again neither refer to the literal “gather of information” which is not what perceptions is in British English.
Or, and I say this sincerely without malice, try not use words which maybe you don’t know how to use properly, or which don’t translate across properly.
Or simply keep it quite literal.
I if you actually bothered to read properly my response explains what he was trying to say.
No one is saying said weakpoints will somehow metamorph and change size, we’re saying that through using the vehicles it’ll change how you percieve them.
I can guarantee you that if you’d not used the word perception here he would not have responded with “yes”.
Is that comment vague? No. So maybe instead of going into a tirade about me not having a quick peek into the oxford dictionary just use those little arrows in every comment and your english skills to read a bit into the discussion before tearing into one singular comment thats misunderstood. Dont worry ill use visual perception next time or a better fittting word so you guys dont need to lose your head over doing a bit of reading.
1 Like
That comment isn’t no.
No one said that it was, however your use of perception in that comment completely changes the narative of the conversation, that is how language works.
The comment which uses perception in it, completely from being related to the physical size of said weakspots, to how you feel about them which again, the previous comment to that, slighting you for not having used them is also insuating.
Again, use your ability to read I stated that I’ve read down from the last comment I made which was maybe 100 or so back.
Or you can just say “will using the tanks change the size of the weakspots”.
Keep it simpler for yourself.
Oh cool all the tanks that do not have any additional protection to their autoloading system are getting buffs. I used to like playing 10.0 all the tanks felt kind of balanced but now T-72A are just going to absorb shots from the side like their higher tier cousins.
1 Like
Didn’t know the Type 90 was Russian…
Also didn’t know that 300mm [270 for T-90M, and 375 for Type 90] of armor constituted non-weakspot when surrounded by armor of >500mm.
Also you don’t need anti-ERA darts to deal with T-80BVM… lol
“I need Vacuum to deal with Abrams!”
I know you’re probably referring to something else, but this fact that perception impacts things is why T-80BVM’s weakspots look larger to me in my optics than Abrams weakspots do, because therre’s less other material present on a T-80 than an Abrams.
It’s also why Leopard 2A5+'s weakspots look the smallest despite being about the same size as T-90M’s.
2 Likes
No it’s not they chose not to model it.
A tanks turret is a large piece it needs a substantial drive motor/hydraulic system.