Eh it’s fine for where it is tbh but ariete is a bit of a shambles.
I wonder how the new one will be
Ah so something that’s proven to be compatible and existing is the same in your reality as a plan to do something without any proof of it ever being done.
It really isn’t. It’s quite clear for most of the stuff in game
1 Like
The transmission upgrade for the T series tanks as seen in the video is proven to be compatible with the tank and it exists sooo…yeah
The video that goes out of its way to specifically show no speedometer whatsoever? And everything to go by is just ”dude trust me“?
I disagree, the ariete has ok armour at 10.7 the ‘up armoured’ variants have the same level of kinetic protection and worse mobility(ignoring the one with the better engine) they don’t have a round good enough for the brs they’re at even the improved mobility is kinda redundant since it just makes it slightly faster than a leopard with significantly worse armour, and still doesn’t have enough pen.
As for the t-90m it is at a good br, but the leopard 2a7 should be higher, if it was given accurate pen it would be very annoying to fight in a t-90m as it would pretty much always kill on a centre mass shot.
also would like to say I play britain and italy so no I am not biased towards the leopard.
“Plans”.
And yeah, I don’t trust united, as they don’t even have a source in there that states it’s been done…
They bought them, and are actively integrating then…
This is beyond simple “we might do it if we feel like it”.
No matter how fast it goes, its definitely faster than it is currently. How much? cant really say
What video is it. Cus if its of a BVM, people timed it, and found out it was sped up.
1 Like
Well dont know about that but IS-445 crankshaft sensor which communicates with the FCS is being used in the Obj188M2 project which is the T90M2. Also used or some form of it on the Armata engines apparently…T90M2 is not a thing anyway neither the 25kmh reverse speed so I dont know whats the thing about that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4hNAM4huho If we are talking about this video, the turret rotation around 40 seconds into the video cleearly shows that the video isnt sped up I would say
Exactly. If I were to make a ranking of things I trust, the word of a high level corporate official (with nothing to back it) spoken in a video meant to literally advertise their new product to a buyer would be ranked pretty damn low.
Then again, maybe my standards for what I consider proof are off.
Brimstone ones were never put on the German Eurofighters.
Nor brimstone 2s.
Only now are they going to put on brimstone 3.
How is it not?
If the eurofighter typhoon for germany has the brimstone 1 missiles, which it does in game.
Yet IRL it never mounted them, whatsoever and only recently did Germany actually trial Brim 3 then yes it is exactly the same.
The Transmission upgrades have been trialed in at least one vehicle, which technically counts for gaijin.
Wether or not it’s implemented, how reliable that transmission is IRL or if it’s ever going to go in to mass production is not known yet.
Not the first time we’ve had trust me bro sources thrown around.
They bought brimstone 3s specifically never brimstone one, nor two for the Eurofighter, which the first one that was added had access to munitions that IRL it never mounted nor could mount.
As you said they have only now bought them and are going through the intergration process.
So yeah it’s the same principle as I said, semantically the same.
The ariete’s I mean for top tier just aren’t up to scratch man, it’s why I haven’t finished Italy yet tbh man.
Yeha but that goes for a lot of stuff RN , if the M829A2 had accurate pen it would be better than what germany has, well it is already better than DM53 as it is out an L/44 caliber cannon.
Eh I’ve got em, and most trees to at least 11.3 so I get whatyou mean
Agreed man, we just gotta weight and see.
We do know they can produce a transmission which has faster reverse gears, they just don’t as costs would go up and it’s not necessary.
1 Like
No, because if it’s compatible with a Eurofighter then it’s good to go according to Gaijin.
Is there actually any proof for that? Because that’s the entire point.
Not really? When it’s a nato vehicle Gaijin usually wants a borderline classified document written with the blood of Truman himself. The discussions about things literally existing are pretty few.
Can we forget about the t90m2.
I want t80bvm upgraded rather then a other t90m .
But also t72b3m with t90 armor.
“needs a buff”
this is a 35mm APDS going trgough his driver.
The very next half second, his APDS went trough my transmission, trough my engine, maked it yellow because it had no more energy, but then escaped and still got trough and killed both my turret crew members.
Their APDS of 30mm just do way more spalling than NATO ones, even when they have a larger caliber.
and 90mm of pen, it should be stopped at some points.
But it literally wasn’t at the time, hence why the need to go through an intergration process now.
as we can see it’s from the actual manufacturor so supposedly yes.
It was with the British ones and Gaijin is on a one for all rule for the EFTs (except for the radar)
Whats from the manufacturer? The video?