According to my experience 38MT offers better zoom, might be wrong tho.
You can check the dedicated thread for that and indeed HAMMER also overperforms in terms of seeker capability.
Unlike Hammer MT is completely fantasy there is not a single evidence that shows it exist and used, not to mention its far better than Hammer.
1 Like
Topic about russian top tier tanks needing buff.
Starting to read this, most of this in here is about jets, cas loadouts etc etc.
Is this gone little offrails?
Neither do I.
I read the actual 38 NII sources and they only suggested the improvement. So anwyays… united24 and defence-blog, yikes. So far a nothingburger and “trust me bro”.
6 Likes
The whole 90M2 topic is just suggestions, plans and ideas…nothing official as in “Yes we are gonna do this or that”. One of the issues you hear all around is the transmission though so it will most likely find its way into the tank but technically not official for now
1 Like
Until it’s been officially confirmed that the new transmission has been at least tested in a prototype it shouldn’t be added to the game. NATO or Chinese vehicles have had things denied for far less.
Same as with the T-80BVM 2023 situation. One single shady video releases where the person in the video claims a 20-23 km/h reverse speed with nothing to back that claim up. Suddenly a lot of the Russian players take this guy’s word as an absolute confirmation.
8 Likes
I agree and maybe not quite clearly but that was my try to say it aswell lol. Its all just talk and proposals but nothing official
1 Like
Hopefully it doesn’t change Br before i can try it out where it is.im at 9.3 for that line rn, took a huge break from the game
Ah yes United24 the Ukraine intelligence page would certainly lie to make the Russian upgrade look good.
10/10 thought process on your behalf.
What do you think @An_Pigeon
Wasn’t the vid from the manufacturer though? Uralvagon- I’m not gonna try and spell it…
Well, could always get the T-14 Armata, which does indeed have an increased forward and reverse speed, better protection, and a much better gun.
Have you actually read your source? They write russia plans to do those upgrades. There’s nothing that suggests that they have actually done any.
Also ofc an Ukrainian outlet has an interest to make their current opponent seem as strong as possible but I guess it’s easier to accuse others of not thinking properly instead of using your brain yourself
1 Like
Yes it was. However I’m still not going to believe the dude on his word, especially since they were extremely careful to keep the speedometer of the car hidden through the entire video.
He wants to sell this tank to the Russian government, a notoriously corrupt organisation, to make money. So I’m not going to just believe him.
Russia top tier ground shouldn’t receive any further buff(s) at all as long as their CAS remain so stupidly far ahead of everyone else.
9 Likes
I mean it’s all situational with these vehicles, it could be a one time thing which is reported or it could be the real deal.
Same as any nations vehicular upgrades during war times.
At least it’s something better than it just being thrown in and no sources or evidence, at all.
just as germany plans to mount brimstone 3 on the Typhoon, yet has access to brim one in game?
At this stage it’s all semantics to suit whatever one says.
same as most companies when they want a goverment contract I suppose
seconded.
Though I think he meant it more as a possible addition as at least we know it can potentially achieve X speeds etc even if it broke down IRl lol
1 Like
the ariete is by far the worst top tier tank in the game, the t-90m is one of the better ones (since you are hand held by the balance team), the t-90m should be bad, but as dm53 doesn’t have accurate pen and should be able to upf you, as it is it’s a good tank(since it has artificially better armour).
gaijin doesn’t understand that the br system means that you can have vehicles be realistic and balanced at the same time.
both the ariete and t-90m if implemented correctly should just not be top tier tanks.
Eh it’s fine for where it is tbh but ariete is a bit of a shambles.
I wonder how the new one will be
Ah so something that’s proven to be compatible and existing is the same in your reality as a plan to do something without any proof of it ever being done.
It really isn’t. It’s quite clear for most of the stuff in game
1 Like
The transmission upgrade for the T series tanks as seen in the video is proven to be compatible with the tank and it exists sooo…yeah
The video that goes out of its way to specifically show no speedometer whatsoever? And everything to go by is just ”dude trust me“?
I disagree, the ariete has ok armour at 10.7 the ‘up armoured’ variants have the same level of kinetic protection and worse mobility(ignoring the one with the better engine) they don’t have a round good enough for the brs they’re at even the improved mobility is kinda redundant since it just makes it slightly faster than a leopard with significantly worse armour, and still doesn’t have enough pen.
As for the t-90m it is at a good br, but the leopard 2a7 should be higher, if it was given accurate pen it would be very annoying to fight in a t-90m as it would pretty much always kill on a centre mass shot.
also would like to say I play britain and italy so no I am not biased towards the leopard.