Chinese top tier is just better Russia bro Idk what you want me to say.
1 Like
The difference between a Jumbo and a T-72, is that the weakspot on the Jumbo can be mitigated by swinging your hull, as it is not a “bar” going across your entire tank. On a T-72, or really any Russian tank, the LFP is the entire width of the tank.
I don´t see RU tanks matches recently, there are mostly UK vehicles
NGL i think going from USSR to the tree that should have just been a USSR subtree to avoid a mountain of copy paste slop isnt the best thing for player experience.
I ♥ M1A2T
Incomplete Sentence
This text will be hidden
2 Likes
Yeah, try to swing the hull on a Tiger II/Ferdinand/Jagdpanther/Jagdtiger shot, great results. /s
2 Likes
Thats true. If you face a Long 88 armed tank you are dead, simple as.
been a couple days since playing them. im a britain main primarily but if you filter to USSR the stats on the T-34-85s and IS1 are from the last two months
You know man, I’m debating on just buying the Fuji to prove how bad Russia really is to these people lol.
It’s been on my mind for a while cause I wanna play Japan.
Fuji is a good purchase to get a feel of how Type 90 plays. Fun vehicle, but bad matchmaker and teams due to Fuji being on sale right now, ironically.
Good point, I-IV ranks are copy paste, then there are (for me) better tanks than RU.
Look I might not agree with your assesment of T-80BVM being “middle of the road”, solely because I think armor does matter and its useful even if glaring weakspots are present (Abrams turret x Abrams turret ring) and not every engagement allows for large enough time window to go for the weakspot even if the opposing tank has superior gun handling; but I respect your opinions.
Nonetheless, back to the topic at had, I still gotta ask - is AZ autoloader capable of reaching that reload speed of 6.66s?
Dont get me wrong, if AZ autoloader is actually IRL capable of reaching that reload speed, they should get it.
Kyü-maruuu
If you can change the order of shells, the 0° when loading and the sekrit documents. Could be
As an Xbox player, can’t get that unfortunately. Maybe in 2 weeks or so but it’ll be about 20% more expensive regardless.
china has some REALLY good and flat out overperforming vehicles (J-8 finback i Hate you) but if OP is really this entrenched into the “russian vehicles are bad” delusion then russia derived vehicles wont make the game better. best to swap to western style vehicles in a different tree
But War Thunder will not add those kind of details
A tank with a reverse gear will change the game for me instantly. War Thunder’s gameplay core simply isn’t very suitable for tanks that lack retreat capability.
Not to mention the better reload speed.
what WT could do, it´s give the modernization, ex: T90M2
1 Like
Using Fox and Scimitar for this information, which is in total of 1 730 battles together (not counting the other two vehicles) and 2 464 battles in total (adding VFM5 which I forgot to count, 5 in total) is very arrogant and wrong. If again we use this information I have 3 410 battles in total in all of my light tanks in the first page of 34 vehicles, the 50% also I don’t get it when we are 3 487 matches in total apart.
Yes, for that I can’t argue, there will be moments of me going after stats of people I discuss against when it comes to stupid posts specially the Russian bias is true ones, these ones I’m not very proud of as well.
Statistics does provide information, but they’re misleading when they lack of total information like @Caernarvon02 mentioned like assists and capturing of bases.
1 Like