Russian top tier tanks need a fair buff

Large Caliber countermeasures has 5 more times effectiveness compare to regular ones, especially Chaff.

Gun itself has better damage output, it only has much less ammunition capacity.

It has TWS modes which greatly increases your awareness, tho in other parts Eagle’s radar better.

People loves to bring this as an excuse but that’s not true, even when multipath height was higher it was the most effective SARH out there.

They are trash compared to 27ER.

Which doesn’t reach that speed unless you fire at high alt.

It also pulls significantly harder than Sparrows which makes them almost impossible to dodge, not to mention IOG makes huge difference when it comes to tracking and you can basically unlock the missile and keep guiding it until terminal phase then lock onto enemy plane and surprise it.

ITs basically first gen ARH missile in that case.

Worse velocity as well as ammo count.
Id rather 500 tounds of 20mm vulcan than what 150 of 30mm.

Be that as it may, due to how warthunder works even regular CM over perfrom massively meaning the fact the F15A has what 240 is it? 120 each compared to su27s mediocre 60 or 90 is a huge difference, even if the large ones are more effective.
The sheer volume the 15A has gives it the advantage.

Im.sorry but the TWS modes are effectively useless as they used to give off bad readings, not sure about now.

The radar by all accounts is a detriment.

Most effective of a useless missile is still a useless missile.
The R73s were the advantage due tk the HMD and the thrust vectoring.
However they had tbeir own issues due to spinning out when the platform was too slow.

Trash? No.
They are worse sure that’s irrefutable but they are not trash at all.
4x Aim7M is still great to have.

I have no idea what you’re quoting here it’s showing my entire message.
On mobile so maybe why.

Im.sorry what ? You can notch the R27ER extremely easily and always have been able to.

Again no ones disputing if the R27ER is better than the 7M at any point.
Just the gaps no where near as large as was made out.

Not by any means is it a first gen ARH.
First gen arh is pheonix.
It has to be active radar homing to be classified as ARH lol.

It’s an IOG designed missile same as the damn 7P.

@H_ngma Once again, i’m tired boss

You and H_ngma can talk once you’ve played them.

3 Likes

Tired of what.

The T80 U is at 11.7 where it needed a reload buff to be competitive, it’s up against the likes of thr M1A1 which rofl stomps it easily.

Providing its two equally skilled players.

The T80B had for hears a 7.1 second reload while.most 10.7 nato.MBTS had 6 or 6.4 expert.
Had comparable mobility but it’s armour even for a T80 wasn’t great.

The T80UD was as Ive said under BRd that i won’t debate.
Then ofc the BVM which has a near 1.4 second slower reload than most top tier mbts aced reloads and 1.1 seconds slower reload compared to expert.

As well as most top tier nations having acxess to dm53 the armours no where near as effective.

T72s suck tbh

This is speaking from having literally all tbe russian MBTs and choosing chinese over them

2 Likes

It doesnt.

You need to deploy 3 chaff in order to defeat regular ARH missiles while single large caliber can effectively confuse seeker with one deploy.

So in practice F-15 only has 40 deploy.

HDN mode works pretty fine and regular mode works quite consistent at 25km.

In that case sparrow becomes even more useless, your logic doesn’t make sense.

The are objectively trash compare to 2ER, trying to praise Sparrow isn’t gonna change its nature.

The only sparrow that can be called decent is the 7P due to having IOG just like 27ER.

Was talking about Sparrows speed, it can only reach Mach-4 at high alt and at certain scenarios.

Did I say notching? I clearly stated that 27ER pulls much harder than Sparrows which makes it much deadlier especially in close to medium range and even if you managed to notch flanker can always lock you back and use IOG advantage to kill you.

It is, just because you refuse to believe it doesnt mean its false.

27ER is so good in terms kinematic and seeker performance it can basically challenge first gen ARH missiles in BVR.

Seems like you didn’t understood the reference.

Welp.

Thats like saying an axe is a shovel because you can dig with an axe in theory.

1 no you do not at all, you can do it notching and ping one.

  • 2 have you completely ignored my point of talking that it’s when the F15A released, not now.
    I am not talking VS ARH missiles.

  • 3 I have used the F15A at top tier and it has more than enough pops at top tier SU27s I’ve seen run out countless times.

The TWS used to give off bad readings, again my entire point is based off of back when these planes were introduced and got preferential treatments not now.
Well now again as the F15A is gonna be the same BR as the objectively worse mig29

the original point being that four aim7ms are better than 2 x r27ers on the mig29 my point about su27 was that it was literally carried by the missile loadout, more so the R73s than 27ERs but they were definitely better than the aim7m when on the su27.

The original comparison which you seem to have missed is that the F15A is now again being put to the same BR as a plane which is objectively worse purely due to players not know how to fly it.

im sorry the 7P is not just decent, it is a fantastic missile it’s litteraly the 2nd best SARH in game followed by the 7M then the 27R

rodger that, the R27ER however -.- has had a report open on it’s speed being too high for a while.

I understand the reference you tried to make, however as I said it wasn’t and isn’t an early type of ARH due to when the damn R27ER went into service lol in the 1990s compared ot the first ARH being 1974

exactly my point xD it’s a silly comparison which has no relevance to how either the IOG system functions NOR the ARH system functions as they’re distinct of one another.

here we go

while having more thrust and better maneuverability

exchanged by large caliber countermesures which are WAY better than normal countermesures

but bigger and way more lethal

RAM vs. TWS
also when u were able of firing ur AIM-7M at the Su-27, it was already capable of firing his R-27ER which was way more probable of hitting u before ur Sparrow was even near of the Flanker, and/or the Flanker could fire an R-27ER to the F-15A, notch, and then recover the lock (which the F-15 can’t).

ofc HMD doesn’t make the Su-27 any better against the highly superior F-15A! (sarcasm…).

and AIM-7M wasn’t obsolete by the height of the multipathing back then too? did it have some kind of clutter filter to make it hit a target flying at 50m of the ground? i completely don’t understand ur point.

(completely ignoring that both R-27ER and Aspide-1A are way faster and MORE maneuverable)

so now u’re bringing ARH to the discussion? weren’t we talking about old times and SARH missiles? also IOG is extremely useful compared to the poor AIM-7M which didn’t have.
and don’t make me make DL enter the conversation.

good for u, i still keep a 1.1 air frags in the Su-27, but playing it is hard when u have R-77 and AIM-120 around 13.3.

i didn’t say it wasn’t fair at 13.0, i said if u knew how to play it at 13.0, it was very good (tho it still gets 13.7 uptiers even at it’s new BR 12.7).

i wasn’t talking about MiG-29, and i prefer having good missiles and bad radar to launch them at the perfect distance my radar can actually get a good hard-lock than having bad missiles and a good radar i can’t use cuz my missiles are so bad that launching them at the max distance my radar can hard-lock would be criminal.

Su-27 fits better for 13.0/13.3, F-15A fits quite decently at 13.0 (especially if we keep in mind it’s a goddamn speed racer and has 240CM).

only russian vehicle that really needs a buff is the Su-17M4. it needs its RWR buffed lol

Both are trash so no point, it turns out that one of them actually played a russian bias vehicle which is the indian t-90

You can put up a challenge by offering NATO mains who can complete the following challenge:

Conditions:
1: >100 matches on any t-series mbts
2: Much greater KD (>1.0) than non-t-series vehicles they had played

If the conditions are fully met, the winner will receive:
[10,000 golden eagles/ one private dance at the strip club]

^ You can bet none of the bustas in that Necron’s list can achieve it. Remember that an idiot with a tool is still an idiot lol

3 Likes

Leo 2 PL: 2.72KDR
T-80UE1: 4.15 KDR


pay up

Ofc this is sarcastic asf. The 2PL stats are so old I had to be careful not to be cursed by some ancient spell while digging them up
Still meets the conditions though ^^

1 Like

I mean you could utilize the third left brain cell to understand how 10.7 work
Bring T90-S to the game to eat ATGMs from the BMPTs and one-death leave teammate doesn’t know how to control the line. Ofc you mostly play 10.7 with RU for easier life eh as the Dev intended
Only a child craving on being META on every game it touch
Go talk to me until your brain has been fully developed kid.

I mean a kid from second grade can understand basic math
BTW that UE1 net camo convenient cover the turret to prevent scalping - very frustrate to fight even with more bushes.

Hnnnnnnngggghhhhh nice stats bro but you disqualified! you have >5KD on swedish Leopard 2

But I do tryna send some just because you are one of the NATO mains that could actually play ru vehicle (not because of bussian rias exist)

Screenshot 2026-03-05 152355

@Necronomica Are there any other ways? last time I could send it to anybody bro

1 Like

Screenshot 2026-03-05 150416
What a phony stat padder, cope more kid

dont worry about it.
No need to give me anything really, given that I hella cherrypicked examples.

I do appreciate the effort though

1 Like

~0.9-1.05 is comsidered good?

The Bishma is really solid at 10.7 wdym?

I think you are part of the cannon fodder teammates that don’t manage to hold the line.

Britain 10.7 is pretty goated.

3 Likes

Just got a nuke the 2 days ago at 10.3 in a Non-RU lobby
Went to 10.7 … BMPT everywhere …what’s goated?