How is it ? I have video of it lofting 70* degree and having 20kg explosive.
1 Like
huh?
isn’t the one ingame based on a TD of the Su-30SM2 paired with the AL-41 of the Su-57?
the FCS is a part of the overall weapon system (including Radar/IRST/HMS/etc), which remains unchanged…
Meaning it’s still that of Su-30SMs… and L-265 (the wingtip ECM suite) isn’t an Su-35 exclusive, it’s featured on multiple members of the flanker family, it also as far as I know lacks SOLO/SOAR, the MAWS/LWS suite of Su-35S.
2 Likes
Sm2 irl dont use irbris nor the al41 upgrade.
Its the same radar as sm with only upgraded range and more cms.
1 Like
The test aircraft fitted with AL-41s for the 30SM2 program wasn’t an Su-30SM2.
1 Like
Yes i know thats why i said it dont use them
1 Like
I know, no one likes being called out for being wrong.
Cool one video, you can take a look into the missile spreadsheet and see that they dont as they should.
That as well but Gaijin will never fix that one. The loft is literally just one value tho.
I know but Brimstones not having any IR seeker is the reason why Gaijin keeps them laser only in comparison to the JAGMs instead of making up an IR seeker to give them FnF without having to use MMW
4 Likes
That’s the same thing as saying every map has a bit of flat terrain somewhere
1 Like
Flash news: Russian MBTs work reasonably well in 1v1s outside Hull-down engagements
They simply do not have the versatility of almost every NATO MBT. I’d rather be in an XM-1 (GM) with M833 or M774 at 10.7 than a T-90S because of how much mobility matters, and how far good gun handling goes.
Also, Gaijin does not put that much effort into making a map.
2 Likes
That doesn’t change the glaring fact they perform better around average players, to which the game is built upon its monetization.
And I’d pick the BMPT over any M1A2 anytime. Your point being besides personal preference?
No one is arguing about map quality. If anything, I pointed out how, for instance, Breslau is a map which openly favors eastern designs by lacking hull down gameplay almost entirely around capture points and focuses on lane-based engagements, where hesitating on aiming leads to you lose the engagement, whereas an eastern MBT can just aim center mass and will cripple you at the very least.
Not to mention the overly redundant amount of courtyards which favors basically unhealthy CQB, where vehicles can just hide turning off their engines and just farm people driving around.
Remember the web-browser flash game, which you just have to spawn troops and tanks in one lane to fight the opponent?
1 Like
What’s the difference from its TT counter part? They all the same.
He spoke about the entire tree, which does not consist of these 3 tanks
Maybe you should read what BR he’s talking about
His wording:
Ig he could have meant “its” to be specifically 11.0+ russia referring to his specific lineup but that is not how I read it
Yup grinding the nation at 12.0 and its meh. What’s hard to understand?
It sounded like you were talking about the nation in whole
I would still say they aren’t far off with a 6-7/10 for Russia top tier ground.
The T-80s pull the rating up slightly but the T-72s/90s dfag it down.
1 Like
Jets/Helis also cracked obviously
1 Like