My guy I’ve heard the same about the BMPT, the KH38MT, LDIRCM, the T58 and the Su30SM2. I’m not gonna believe anyone saying that some new addition, especially one that’s so highly anticipated, will not be broken.
2 Likes
I did the event for the latest Russian tank and skipped the Australian Boxer (that I wanted) because the game is in such a bad state.
Everything I said is true and the reason Gaijin doesn’t get my money anymore. You won’t even concede some of the basics. Not worth talking to. The Russian tech tree has more power than any other nation and you’re still not satisfied. Fake garbage and selective realism and an ardent disregard for balance.
We’ll never agree.
Even worse than Israel and their slow paper armor Merkava 4?
They didn’t need it.
Gaijin could’ve fixed the armor profile on both VT-4 and ZTZ-99/WZ family, add spall liners to them (they actually did it with VT-4’s which I’m quite surprised), and reverse speed on VT-4’s.
We didn’t need copy paste M1A2 (ı know its Tawainese Abram’s so it deserves to be in game but still).
2 Likes
YES! on the wingtips as well. It’s like arguing with children using “what about’isms”.
The falcon can have HVAP too but it’s just not Russian so it gets removed. When all SPAA gun system trolling is a side effect of small maps and urban battle zones where they should be strong.
Western ammo should be going straight through BMPT’s top glacis plates like butter. Anyways pointless complaining.
1 Like
No? Why a buff? Lol, they’re the best performing nation at top tier bar the low player count minors.
2 Likes
I really hope this is bait, haha…
W ragebait
How can they ignore this and watch the que tables, K/D ratios, win rates and think they’re making a legitimate argument?
Not saying skill issue or anything, but recently i have seen this trend going downwards on 11.7 making it playable for the other nations, but i am currently ARB only so no hard promises, Swedeen 4.7 is goated
It doesn’t matter that BMPT is the hands down best tank in the game and easily BR 13.0? The very first BMPT that I met I killed by shooting it’s exposed belt and it detonated, then they split the belts into exposed and internal in a later patch.
The Weapon systems are impervious to overpressure from HEAT and HESH.
Why can’t I put a 730mm RHA penetrating British APFSDS right through it’s front glacis plate, bias and selective realism. “No you can have 564mm penetration and unfinished and sabotaged armour profile have fun”
No, no money for you for 4 years running of a 14 year old account.
Fact are entirely optional to the average ru player
I only played it at 13.0, but yeah in turret down you can only kill it after ‘exhausing’ era (TT one), idk how it for you, but for me WT feels the same from 11.7+ as everything is too similar for my taste.
There is also that USA experimental with crewless turret, wonder how it is in hull down.
Fires are annoying, i feel like ammo detonations block certain high pen rounds, personally i think 30mm’ish ± 10mm rounds irl are not as prone to ammo rack as the round would just scatter the belt everywhere without much exploding ?? I might be very wrong, but still some ammo racks on wheeled chassis feel weird, like on the bushmaster platform shooting the belt would just destroy the belt, not nuke the vehicle ? Or atleast this is how i feel about low caliber explosions
Idk what OP likes about japan, the top tier is armored with very heavy air, like sure 4s reload is very good, but how the hell does it weight 50+ tons and have no ‘working’ armor, and br gaps
I had a comical encounter the other week when a 2s38 kept failing to sideshot my T-90 Bhishma for about 30 shells.
I hate that external fires block repair making them an artificial nerf instead of a design benefit.
I never played as Japan but that 4 second reload with a guy with good ping is top tier, but if you have bad ping Russia is the best nation to play to bounce rounds off trolly armour. I feel like Fuji is the sportscar of the top tanks but high skill level. Same with Abrams if good ping it’s great, if not the lack of lower armour makes you a easy Exp. piñata.
The old track volumetric fouling the shots?
Yes they are bad - for all nations in one way or another.
It’s not just gross amount of hills. It’s also the size, the spawn points, the cap points and many other factors.
1 Like
The crew matter though, soviet bias with autoloaders doesn’t force you to increase crew level for competitive loading time, while most Nato tanks force you to level them up and \ or upgrade qualifications to remain competetive ( From 6.5s, which is as fast or slower than T80, to 5s which is 1s faster and generally almost as good as it gets )
1 Like
Jumbo at 6.3 faces enemies that can pen the UFP without aiming for the mg port.
And if Jumbo swings too much it just opens itself up for easier hits.
