I literally put a ? there and said maybe i really dont know what else you want me to do lol
And btw i do know that the 38MT is fake and the LMUR is unrealistically overperforming over its competitors
The fact that youre making "maybe hasnt been tested " and “maybe doesnt exist at all” equivalents is so funny
I very much did not, thanks for asking.
Tri mode seeker + Gaijin not liking MMW radar seekers
Citation needed.
And Rafael brochures, and Diehl brochures and it generally being modular.
Shout out to gaijin for denying the OLS-35 bug report though, despite the fact they didn’t see the conflicting issues of an Su-30SM2 using optronic designed to work alongside a specific radar…
the FCS is a part of the overall weapon system (including Radar/IRST/HMS/etc), which remains unchanged…
Meaning it’s still that of Su-30SMs… and L-265 (the wingtip ECM suite) isn’t an Su-35 exclusive, it’s featured on multiple members of the flanker family, it also as far as I know lacks SOLO/SOAR, the MAWS/LWS suite of Su-35S.
I know, no one likes being called out for being wrong.
Cool one video, you can take a look into the missile spreadsheet and see that they dont as they should.
That as well but Gaijin will never fix that one. The loft is literally just one value tho.
I know but Brimstones not having any IR seeker is the reason why Gaijin keeps them laser only in comparison to the JAGMs instead of making up an IR seeker to give them FnF without having to use MMW
They simply do not have the versatility of almost every NATO MBT. I’d rather be in an XM-1 (GM) with M833 or M774 at 10.7 than a T-90S because of how much mobility matters, and how far good gun handling goes.
Also, Gaijin does not put that much effort into making a map.