idk how this is an argument its just my experience also i never said the 2a7 and 122 dont face russia
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Statshaming others instead of addressing their arguments isn’t the way to do things.
what else do u want me to do if this guys has negative stats on everything he touches?
you know your losing an argument when u start statshaming
3 Likes
It’s also against forum rules.
1 Like
i have been answering to ur blatant arguments the moment u started saying russian tanks are good.
the fact u don’t have actually good stats in ur russian tanks while saying they’re good says a lot about how rotten ur brain is after hearing a lot of people saying they’re good and how the popular opinion has invaded ur mind when they’re actually some of the worst tanks ingame.
CAS? yes really good
tanks? not at all.
also 27 kills and 9 deaths in the black night on my most recent session isnt terrible + russia was my first ever ground nation when i knew NOTHING about ground so obviously the k/d isnt gonna be great ive nuked in the t80uk multiple times
tell me how there some of the worst tanks in the game
yeah ofc, and u played +700 battles in the T-72AV (TURMS-T) when u knew NOTHING about ground, i doubt if u can play 700 battles and learn nothing.
i have nuked twice in the T-62M-1 and 1 in the Tiger II, good for u nuking in the UK.
im not agreeing with him but bringing up someones stat in balance discusion is entirely valid thing to do.
2 Likes
This.
@Flanker_Thunder
All statshaming does as a reader is give the opposing party legitimacy.
Going positive or negative doesn’t make your opinions any more or less valid.
Someone that isn’t as skilled as others at the game can easily spot and call out OP vehicles.
And a god at the game can be blind to OP vehicles.
It also derails discussion…
its really isnt
congrats
T-90M: bad reload, bad shell, 2 Gen thermals, bad reverse, deadly autoloader (weakspot), relies too much in ERA.
T-80BVM: bad shell, meh reverse, even more deadlier autoloader (weakspot), relies too much in ERA too.
even more, T-90M is lacking multiple things rn, just like 3rd Gen thermals or it’s respective APS.
it really is, it says a lot about how much that person knows about what he’s talking.
it’s ez to die in a match, getting lots of kills isn’t.
u have negative K/D in most russian tanks, and u’re saying they’re good? if they’re good then u shouldn’t have bad stats on them, cuz in ur words they’re extremely OP and don’t deserve a buff, while u have horrible performance on them.
1 Like
because?
if i had to choose between two different doctors opinion, where doctor 1) has solved thousand of cases succesfully and doctor 2) has solved only a handful of cases succesfully, im going with opinion of doctor 1).
same logic applies here. your stats are merely a translation of how well you understand game.
3 Likes
t90m: amazing armour weird volumetric with the ERA and breech good gun handling 3bm60 is a good shell so thats just odd but other statements sure there valid
t80bvm: good shell meh reverse deadly autoloader (stil doesnt always ammo rack) good mobility amazing gun handling decent reload speed and weird volumetric breech
because there stats from years ago? you dont have to be an E-sports player to have knowledge on the game
Volumetric armor is weaker than non-volumetric armor due to no overlapping plates. ERA ain’t that.
And volumetric rounds buffed heavy tanks more than all other tanks.
And T-80BVM’s breech only matters if you’re stock grinding, otherwise its entire turret where ERA isn’t placed is lol-penned by L27A1 to M829A2.