Who landed a 12000 lb H.C Mk.I bomb on this guy’s tank?
That tank is ass tho
1 Like
It’s pretty alright. It might not be the best, but it’s still good enough that I expect better than 1.2 K/D from someone that is so confident about Russian MBTs being easy to defeat.
The 2A4M was mostly just an example. The dude likes to talk a lot of smack, but I have yet to see anything from them to back it up.
2 Likes
Fair enough.
Eh. In vacuum, sure, but if you have germany already researched as i did, its honestly waste of money.
2PL fills the same niche (lighter Leopard 2 wirh better thermals) better due to shell, cant make 12.0 lineup etc.
And for new players Pzbtl123 will do more.
1 Like
I bet u can’t actually argue about something of russian tanks being good.
Thx for proving my point
Armor? Small weakspots? Like russian tanks are not great but acting like they have nothing is pure cope
How’s LFP, a huge piece armor, a “small weakspot”?
How’s the roof of a russian tanks, a huge piece of armor, a “small weakspot”?
How are the sides of any russian MBT, a super weak piece of crap that can be pen by anything with +60mm, a “small weakspot”?
Armor only works for people who don’t know how to aim, like it usually is.
1 Like
True, all they need to do is to properly aim for the “small weak spots” 🙃
Well of course theyre big if you compare it to a fiat 500 for example. But they are literally the smallest due to the tanks being smaller.
Spoiler
Is the concept of comparison known to you? Because no matter what you yap russian tanks have still better side armor than every other tank in the game courtesy of stupid ERA modeling. Acting like armored UFP and small weakspots are not an advantage is probably the biggest piece of russian copium.
Yeah and russia players dont since borderline everything on the average non ru tank is a weakspot so whats your point exactly outside of being obnoxious?
6 Likes
Quite an ignorant statement that mate…
They had the largest army in europe lol not exactly a weak nation by any standard.
Not that small but that’s the thing.
What point is that proving?
I know that most of NATO tanks are huge weak spots, but that doesn’t mean you can just point n click them carelessly. As a good example you can take the Abrams. Volumetric armor under the gun (not the neck), strong turret cheeks (at least 12.0 onward) and the absurdly angled ufp plate that ricochets everything.
So your “small weakspots” are actually small weakspots, because they are far smaller than the ones on every other tank. Great that we cleared that up.
Cool, I guess it’s useless to argue against someone who hasn’t touched a single late cold war Soviet tank in their entire wt career.
1 Like
Skill issue fr
What? Having twice the fire rate at the same accuracy as the massively nerfed NATO auto cannons isn’t exactly realistic nor fair?
3 Likes
Most of the NATO tanks have arguably artificial weak spots. Since GJN loves guestimating armor values and other stuff. And tends to fall very low for NATO things, and very high for Russian things. Which is a bit of a trend. According to Gaijin western tanks are just big and heavy for no reason, inferior western engineering.
And “you can’t on shot em!” isn’t an argument when you take them out of commission easily and can then finish them off at their leisure.
ok so playing a russian tank changes my VISUAL perception or what?
Do the weakspots magically get bigger once you play it yourself?
Or are you just talking out of your backside without thinking for a second?
1 Like