Turret basket
The current BMPT should already have one, shouldn’t it?
Maybe. I never bothered to look at the xray lol.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/y8ASjzOHJpzR
Looks like they should but I guess the BMPT is just special.
Dunno if it’s only on my side but playing Russia 12.0 is just 2/3rd of the time being steamrolled by the enemy team right now.
1 Like
Welcome to reality outside of the forum.
2 Likes
Not particularly surprising. Russian 12.0 is a bunch of meh and a Pantsir while US 12.0 is so ridiculously stacked its not even funny anymore.
4 Likes
lmao did they really reject it even though it literally has a screenshot from russian TV of the factory placing the turret on the hull? XDDDD
snail and its favoritism
I bet if it was to the benefit of a russian vehicle that would be a valid source
its insane how many valid reports of BMPT bias are there but they are closed because the “Bug Manager” diety deems them not a bug
1 Like
Well i wasnt joking when i said that the BMPT is special. Ammo layout, Basket, the thing just gets treatment that other similar vehicles simply dont get. Maybe theyll revisit the modeling of that thing after the 72 makes enough money.
In another report, they said its not a basket but aluminium casing.
I dont need to comment further on that, do I?
Basket is a basket when they feel like it but not when it’s to artificially buff the damage model of a vehicle they intentionally made demented to make the accountant happy.
4 Likes
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1wu2u1n/dm53_650mm_pen_vs_bmpt/
Another reddit rant again, I mean they’re constantly leaving signs of shadow buff and shadow nerf in real time.
Very delicate conspiracy if not :D
However, right now i’m very annoyed by the armor of the top tier T90, they are tend to block darts on normal angles.
What you guys dont realise is that this bmpt has extra armor even harder to pen than standard bmpts. So we will have way more “Aiiiiii shiba” why are you running moments.
Funny how come no one has yet complayed about the F3H calling it american bias, but cried out D1 about the Yak130
2 Likes
Oh hell nah the french guy is back
pantsir sm sv is so op it should be entirely removed from the game, there is no reason for it
or make the matches have russia vs russia only
Complaining about SPAA that can only deal with CAS… okay buddy.
yeah because only one country gets it and it has more ammo than a few SAMs combined, the country which also gets the strongest CAS
if it were up to me I would yeet the russian tree entirely and remake it to be equal to NATO counterparts and use the same standard for documents not this biased parameters out of thin air for relikt era, 38mt, … and adding things that no other country has a counterpart for
it was the same with the first pantsir, it should not be added and instead they should give russia TOR like china had but nooo they always have to get the best most op toys that no other country can match in the game
1 Like
Which doesn’t matter because tanks win matches, not CAS.
CAS spam on my team has lost me over 80% of matches than moral-reduction of my team from enemy CAS spam.
Because using 560 - 900 spawn points for one vehicle that can’t capture & defend points is not conducive to winning.
In order to make USSR equal to NATO it’d have to be given NATO equipment, cause not even T-14 would make it as powerful as NATO tech trees.
Kh-38MT carriers have counters in-game… they’re the 12.7 SPAA systems.
Relikt ERA does have counters, it’s called APFSDS & aiming.
SPAA is not & has never been OP, ever.
“SPAA is OP!” is a CAS main cope.
1 Like
I am in no way a CAS main and despise it but a single pantsir completely negates western CAS while russia roams free with their kh38s and untouchable helis
with the introduction of ARMs its much harder to kill kh38 carriers, and you will eventually run out of ammo unlike pantsir
1 Like
Kh-38 carriers are still easy to deal with.
& CAS shouldn’t be encouraged to begin with, so I’m glad Pantsir is helping NATO teams win.