Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

Can’t wait for multiply topics about how US is op and devs are clearly biased towards US. Or it works only when it’s russian vehicles?

2 Likes

Gee I do wonder why all those good players are still playing top tier US, a real mystery that one.

2 Likes

Win Rate don’t prove nothing and should be not taken to account in balance at all , skilled players don’t stuck to one nation.

Except when Russia WR is green - then its 100% proof of Russian bias

4 Likes

Overall, the situation in the USA remains unfavorable and it will take more time to assess the situation. Not rather the next Russian super weapon

Sick bait.

3 Likes

W all-time stats
So relevant

4 Likes

Why are we using all-time stats?

3 Likes

image
July 2026

2 Likes

“It’s because ussr mains suck at the game and they no brain”

~ NATO mains

4 Likes

man use the new stats no all time… :D u live in the past?

2 Likes

Please don’t act like thats not literally the same excuse ussr mains constantly use when the US or Germany have low winrates.

This demonstrates why this topic exists, You cannot deny the overall data

And from the comparison, it can be seen that when the top average WR of USA is excellent, the WR of UK, JP, ITA, FR, SWE, and ISL all exceed 50. However, when the WR of RUS is excellent, only ITA has a WR above 50, while the WRs of the other countries are all below 50. This is sufficient to illustrate many problem


There is some truth in this, I mean you can literally look at the posters in this type of threads, especially NATO mains who hadn’t researched anything in ussr thinking they have any rights to comment about the vehicle balancing lol even laughable some has negative kd in their leopard 2a7, because these guy would definitely perform worse in their bvm/t-90m even if they get their hands on it. Like these guys even fail when using the best tool so what do they know

2 Likes

There isn’t lol. It’s just ussr mains coping the same way every other major main is.
It neither makes sense from a logical standpoint nor from a statistical one. We know how good/bad the average war thunder player is. It wouldn’t make any sense that of all groups the biggest playerbase would be considerably better on average than the rest.

Yeah and the same type of people are over there on the russian forum but those guys don’t even speak English so you don’t see them here.

1 Like

We lied from the start, RU never win over NATO

1 Like

This is also not the overall data, since statsharks only tracks from februari 2025 onwards.

I do wonder how the overall stats would look like if we took the absolutely massive winrates of the 2A5, 2A6 and 2A7V back in their primes.

1 Like

This is all data .You are wrong
No one will play over 100million times of “Leopard 1” or “72AV” within 2025-2026

It isn’t, because statshark doesn’t track data from before februari 2025.

Or do you have another explanation for why a vehicle like the M1 Abrams, which has been in game since march 2018, only has stats from fabruari 2025 onwards?

Let’s be honest, you are probably just here to ragebait.

I’m not so sure about that in regards to the all time Stats. Statshark exists only since February 25 but the total games played for that Abrams for example are more than the games played since Feb 25. The question is just whether that applies to winrate

1 Like