Not to mention WT reloads unaffected by hitting bumps or general mobility, and they never tire out.
Also having 2 crew and being able to control turret while reloading. Lmao.
2 Likes
I last played it around Nov 25th 2025, in the height of LMUR and RU CAS spam. And i’ll play it over T-90M every day of the year.
2 Likes
They likely don’t have it. And nobody wants to grind out another tree over a forum discussion.
Instead you get CBT flaws that get you killed upon the inconvenience of seeing a player with more than room temp iq.
It quite clearly shows KH-58 as the best overall as its pretty much the same as most others other than ALARM and ARMAT before not slowing down at all…
I timed it well, even giving some miliseconds extra as margin of error.
I do not see why.
I started grinding it bc of the cool looking harriers and also they have the chally 2 with iron fist which can intercept sabots.
Where is the folks saying the BMPT “wasn’t responsible for RU WR”
“I kill braindead BMPT for breakfast, lunch, dinner”
“Abrams, Leopard, Stroking-vehicle 122B+ master race”
And all the sudden memory loss about all the statements.
1 Like
It only gets those results due to a large part of the playerbase struggling against it’s single strength and refusing to learn from it.
Those matches are hardly ever won by the T-90M lol.
I have already done your challenge. My Ariete and all my Chally 2s have better stats than the T-90M and were honestly all more fun to play.
The T-90M is mediocre at the very best, I still prefer calling it dogshit.
3 Likes
Credit where it is due. Fair enough.
…and yet your stats in the T-90M are still on a par with your 12.7 Abrams such as the SEPv2. A tank which you have said you enjoy and prefer to use over T-90M yet statistically the T-90M has netted you more results.
See the contradiction?
1 Like
I played a lot of my SEPv2 games when the 2A7 was at it’s most powerful 2-3 years ago, combined with me just not being as decent back then as I am now.
The gooner M1A1 HC, M1A2T, M1A2 trophy and SEPv3 are my more recently played Abrams and all sit considerably higher than the T-90M in performance.
2 Likes
yeah the russians have worse shells not only because of historical reasons but also…THEIR NOT FIGHTING RUSSIAN BIAS ERA AND BLACK HOLE BMPT ARMOR! THEY DONT NEED BETTER SHELLS!
this is so real, im so tired of the “T-series sucks” gaslighting from these people.
Just because you seemingly struggle against them doesn’t make them good suddenly.
3 Likes
According to your own stats you do better in them so cope harder.
They struggle against it. Ok so you just proved our point. Even if it’s a single strength (which it isn’t) it’s a strength that unrealistically and undeservedly coddles Russian players into victory at a way higher rate than other nation. Your point is moot.
Challenger2E > T90M
1 Like
I played chinese ztz96a which its like a soviet tank but with less armor, and I can say I managed to play better with it, even pulling more nukes in a short time compared to my long history of german and israeli tanks.
Damn, please guys let my tank in peace
1 Like
I do better in my T-90M than in my SEPv3? Well that is news to me.
It is. The T-90M only has 1 strength, which is armor. It’s mediocre to garbage in every other aspect.
