After all this, I think Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4 will be all I need to distance myself from WarThunder.
Rage bait that makes someone seem like they need a helmet for grocery shopping is not good rage bait.
1 Like
It isn’t about the fact ‘other countries’ do it.
Its the fact that the majority of what is publicly discernable about the majority of Russian armor and air assets is wildly inconsistent with what Wargaming is trying to display.
Sure - every power lies about its capabilities, armor, munitions, deployments and etc. Only one power is getting literal wonderwaffe that are contradicted by limited evidence and still being introduced - that is Russia. KH-38MT proves this decidedly.
Wargaming actively fellates the RU tree at every chance it gets and every chance it doesn’t get. There is no other tree in terms of nationality that has gotten this focus, consistency and favoritism.
Wargaming does not balance these tree’s correctly and routinely gives Russia the advantage because of its bias- no matter what story about ‘both sides get good stuff’ they are trying to tell you today. It’s been this way this 2015 at least - if not longer.
Because the T-90M is nothing special IRL.
It’s a mediocre tank, fielded by a mediocre nation, in mediocre numbers with a absolutely infantile manufacturing number.
No - just because you watched some neo-USSR nonsense about the T-90 performance in UKR or versus its peers doesn’t mean you know what you are talking about.
T-90 deserves it position - it is not exceptional by most performance accounts that are credible, I.E. non-Russian or Wargaming propaganda.
So sick of hearing this T-90 crybaby nonsense from RU mains who get fantasy vehicles in air and ground with completely detached winrates.
1 Like
Wargaming has nothing to do with wt
2 Likes
And what does this have to do with my post about calling out a skill issue player.
If anything you helped reinforce my point lol.
2 Likes
Dude doesn’t even know WT isn’t WG’s game lol.
3 Likes
Wargaming ? The same wargaming that makes donation for Ukraine army has Russian Bias ?
2 Likes
Depends on the 3rd party win rate you look up less than 20% barely. But I’m not saying its a good thing that the win rates so heavily favor Russia.
What I said is the snail does not give a expletive about it.
I’m sure we’re all aware of who Ralin is, but:
“western test is invalid test, is a lie”
“special container therefore cant be real”
About SCDB’s property of not exploding, and him basically saying 1 - 2mm thick containers prevented the explosions (how? i guess sheet metal can prevent everything - just ignore how the containers can’t stop the propellant from heating up or getting damaged by the donor’s deflagration because that’s pretty violent… he’s in active denial of anything novel that is western, but phishes for classified documents under the guise of “wanting of learn” as he himself told me in DM’s - but dw, he will deny that Germany made something that can’t rly explode, because it’s not possible, because the tests are false/invalid, because iz not rossiyan)
12 Likes
Have we reported him yet for trying to get classified stuff via DMs?
Both he and Mr ‘Not a Bug’ are very much of the same inclination. A very Russo-centric view of the world and technology in general - combined with a distinct lack of self-awareness.
I do note that after the last spat - he legged it off the forum Za Rodina when his ‘unique take was not universally applauded’.*
*Well, it’s kinder than saying ‘mercilessly mocked’.
1 Like
I can neither confirm nor deny.
:)
3 Likes
Gotcha - say no more about it.
1 Like
Oh hey Beaker - back from the RU Forums again. We always have a place for you here if you’d stop running around.
Well, bug reports generally tend to go two ways:
- is it Western? no amount of sources works, i.e: Leopard 2A7V having the armor of a pre-prototype? “Not a bug, but you can’t use Swedish Trials because the tank is too new”, and “You can’t use new sources because they don’t have any nubmers”, so we end up with a tank with maybeee 50% of its actual armor.
- is it Eastern? yes, but unless it’s a MiG-29, it will be given every possible handout, along with plates that catch spall, but don’t spall themselves.
RU forum made a bug report about how BMPT ammo chutes explode A DAY before the patch dropped, it was pushed ahead by a Russian tech-mod, and fixed on release day lol, and now we’re dealing with an AFV that is basically invincible hull-down.
Meanwhile, the CR 2 re-work made it straight up worse, even though the reports the re-work was apparently based on, would’ve made it vastly better. Every patch the CR 2s mobility just keeps getting worse, somehow.
We’ve had very well sources reports be labelled as “Not a bug” because of inability of people like Ralin/TrickZZter/a few others (the general trend seem to be they all are usually Russian, or at least originate from the Russian forum, because Western ones tend to be far more impartial, especially ones like Gunjob), to accept that Western vehicles/technology can in fact be vastly superior to Russian one.
Bonus points: Chinese tech is treated basically the same as Western one by them. Hence why ZTZs and VT-4s perform the way they perform, and why China needed an Abrams to actually be decent.
14 Likes
Oh really ? How about Su-27 ? Like literally when Su-27 had really wierd flight model and dozen of report with Su-27SK manual got hit with “Marketing lie” players acually had to find Developers source by numbers and prove it was wrong.
Just like F-15E getting better engines and fantasy flight model right before the release.
Oh damn like there was no Rafale buff.
2 Likes
Rafale and EFT players went through the same, and EFT in the end was nerfed even :)
Just like F-15E getting better engines and fantasy flight model right before the release.
Just like the Su-30SM2, with its AL-41s and Irbis-E huh?
Should I mention how basically every high-tier RU jet is also getting Kh-38MX’s despite only Su-25SM3 and Su-34 being actually certified and capable of using them?
Or maybe how the Kh-38MT doesn’t even exist aside from a demo-model?
Maybe even, the LMUR being the only F&F with proper LOFTing?
On top of SM-SV getting fantasy missile behavior, while not a single Western SAM actually performs the way they should?
How about Kornets being beefed up to 1200mm of penetration, when RU sources state 960mm?
Oh damn like there was no Rafale buff.
Y’all cried the R-77-1 out of it, and it actually made all the jets that have it, better.
9 Likes
Basic math.
Yeah no.
All this argument was about Bug report system and F-15E still has better engine despite you saying that no amout of sources will work and as you confirmed Su-27, EFT, Rafale has gone same amout of bullcrap to make change.
LMUR or Kh-38 or Su-30SM2 has nothing to do with our subject since devs added them as they intendet to be, they didn’t change it like with Su-27.
The better engine of the F-15E has existed for about 30 years now, so why wouldn’t the F-15E have it?
Also it really wasn’t bug reports that changed the F-15E engine situation, it was just classic community complaints and “outrage”.
1 Like