Calm down, child, why are you so mad? Just because your gang doesn’t have cool toys.
Please don’t trust me, or him.
You see Komrade - the turret doesn’t stay on the tank as much as we’d like…
Pointless putting basket in something that ends up in the next postcode the moment a mouse so much as farts at it.
2 Likes
Literally just Japan and Israel. France is a NATO member, theyre just not part of the integrated military command or something like that.
1 Like
What on earth are you talking about? There is literally proof posted here that youre yapping garbage.
Its easy to have cool toys when the game developer artifically pampers your stuff so it doesnt get curbstomped every game.
3 Likes
Translation : The French are awkward.
1 Like
Appeal to emotions. ZVO can’t handle facts.
1 Like
In soviet/Russia comrade
In soviet russia what? Are you missing the second half of your comment?
He’s giving it his all to ragebait, btw
1 Like
After all this, I think Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4 will be all I need to distance myself from WarThunder.
Rage bait that makes someone seem like they need a helmet for grocery shopping is not good rage bait.
1 Like
It isn’t about the fact ‘other countries’ do it.
Its the fact that the majority of what is publicly discernable about the majority of Russian armor and air assets is wildly inconsistent with what Wargaming is trying to display.
Sure - every power lies about its capabilities, armor, munitions, deployments and etc. Only one power is getting literal wonderwaffe that are contradicted by limited evidence and still being introduced - that is Russia. KH-38MT proves this decidedly.
Wargaming actively fellates the RU tree at every chance it gets and every chance it doesn’t get. There is no other tree in terms of nationality that has gotten this focus, consistency and favoritism.
Wargaming does not balance these tree’s correctly and routinely gives Russia the advantage because of its bias- no matter what story about ‘both sides get good stuff’ they are trying to tell you today. It’s been this way this 2015 at least - if not longer.
Because the T-90M is nothing special IRL.
It’s a mediocre tank, fielded by a mediocre nation, in mediocre numbers with a absolutely infantile manufacturing number.
No - just because you watched some neo-USSR nonsense about the T-90 performance in UKR or versus its peers doesn’t mean you know what you are talking about.
T-90 deserves it position - it is not exceptional by most performance accounts that are credible, I.E. non-Russian or Wargaming propaganda.
So sick of hearing this T-90 crybaby nonsense from RU mains who get fantasy vehicles in air and ground with completely detached winrates.
1 Like
Wargaming has nothing to do with wt
2 Likes
And what does this have to do with my post about calling out a skill issue player.
If anything you helped reinforce my point lol.
2 Likes
Dude doesn’t even know WT isn’t WG’s game lol.
3 Likes
Wargaming ? The same wargaming that makes donation for Ukraine army has Russian Bias ?
1 Like
Depends on the 3rd party win rate you look up less than 20% barely. But I’m not saying its a good thing that the win rates so heavily favor Russia.
What I said is the snail does not give a expletive about it.
I’m sure we’re all aware of who Ralin is, but:
“western test is invalid test, is a lie”
“special container therefore cant be real”
About SCDB’s property of not exploding, and him basically saying 1 - 2mm thick containers prevented the explosions (how? i guess sheet metal can prevent everything - just ignore how the containers can’t stop the propellant from heating up or getting damaged by the donor’s deflagration because that’s pretty violent… he’s in active denial of anything novel that is western, but phishes for classified documents under the guise of “wanting of learn” as he himself told me in DM’s - but dw, he will deny that Germany made something that can’t rly explode, because it’s not possible, because the tests are false/invalid, because iz not rossiyan)
10 Likes
Have we reported him yet for trying to get classified stuff via DMs?
Both he and Mr ‘Not a Bug’ are very much of the same inclination. A very Russo-centric view of the world and technology in general - combined with a distinct lack of self-awareness.
I do note that after the last spat - he legged it off the forum Za Rodina when his ‘unique take was not universally applauded’.*
*Well, it’s kinder than saying ‘mercilessly mocked’.
1 Like