I don’t get it. Anyone can argue anything they like it doesn’t mean they will be successful in their endeavor.
Chinese ztz Diesel tanks with -4 kph are basically the exact same thing. Higher Chinese tanks are even better than Russia ones but still have the same useless gun depression. Still nothing compared to Leopard or good NATO.
Wrong.
It has armor, survivability,awareness and decent combination of mobility and firepower.
Thats why you dont rush like a headless chicken in T-90M (you can still be quite agressive ir you know what you’re doing) nor try to use every single abusable map point.
T-90M requires significantly more skill level compare to average Russian tanks which is why most Russian mains complains about bein bad.
Leclerc, Chally-2, VT-4’s/ZTZ-99A-WZ-1001 and Strv-122’s be like: Get in line.
You can still find a good spot on those maps to avoid T-90M’s weakness, hell despite its weaknesses you can still brawl with it, 2 days ago I managed to get nuke with T-90M while playing as brawler, it works like a charm with proper advancing tactics and awareness.
The Leopard and M1A2 have better armor and more crew than the T90, the T90 gets 1 shotted at the side ALWAYS, whereas the other ones depending on how trolly the game is, may survive.
From the front the “weakspots” work 50% on Nato tanks and when they do, it’s mostly horizontal/loader kill.
you can’t be serious
their rounds are equal or better. Their reloads are all better - giving them superior firepower (besides ZTZ-99)
both abrams and leopard 2 have superior firepower and armour + mobility combinations.
Merkava mk.4M is also good
T-80 is simply better than T-90 due to reload + mobility
I’m serious.
It has good P/W ratio alongside with good acceleration but ofc you will be tunnel visioned to revers speed only.
No they are not better, only 122 has slight better penetration (10-15mm on 90 degree which doesnt change anything in practice).
WZ-1001 be like, not to mention aside from 122’s all of them has significantly bigger weakspots compare to T-90M which reduces their survivability a lot.
And where did mention those tanks in anywhere? Trying to strawmanning will not help you in this case.
According to you, everyone has different taste and playstyle.
Wt favours vehicles that have good mobility, reload and firepower over armour.
yeah, the reverse is the reason why the mobility is bad, you simply cannot retreat back into cover. The bad depression only serves to enhance that downside
Wt favors map/game knowledge, knowledge about vehicles and bravery.
Learn the difference
Only if you over expose yourself like an idiot.
Remember the first rule of survivability onion.
Again this heavily depends on map knowledge, learn which spots suits most for vehicles so you can stop complaining 24/7.
the superior reverse and depression of NATO vehicles literally is the first part of the survivability onion.
you don’t need to expose as much of yourself and can hide infinitely faster.
First part of survivability onion is to dont get seen.
The part you’re referring is the second and third.
2- If you get seen, don’t get shot at
3-If you get shot dont sit,retreat and dont die.
Those two feature has nothing to do with first rule.
.
Like it or not you will get seen and expose to certain degree even in hulldown position so your claim is still wrong in this case.
NATO vehicles have the superior mobility, they tick that box
Mobility has nothing to with that part only.
Mobility only gives you better chance to take better positions early against clueless players, any experienced player will check those places before even moving forward.
Again you’re wrong.
well the chally’s l27 is certainly worse, the reload is debatable, as u get much slower after the first 4 shots
Lie and tell me the Brits are more mobile than Russia (exception: reverse gear)
Imagine if instead of EF2000 spawncamping helos and SPAA it was Russia, the meltdowns would be insane
So what, i once blinked up in an IRIS-T radar for a second, didn’t realise he shot at me and the missile killed me all the way back at the airfield.
Some maps are just bad to play helicopters/planes.
gng saying something different from the “russian bias narrative” isn’t ragebait ✌️✌️✌️
Sooo…Neurologist then?
My best tanks are like the Chinese tanks excluding the vt4 but regardless they also have larger weak points.
Your first sentence is my point anyone can argue anything when it comes to skill so its pointless to include skill as a reason as to why something is good or bad.
This is sound like a “your play style” problem than the tank itself
Jesus lol at this point you are literally trolling. You two talking about the T-90M correct?
How do you remain hidden when there is a useless mg that is 100 foot tall? the sep v2 literally have the same problem. Wanna sneak around, try T-80bvm or Leos, not the freaking t-90m with that mg turret bro don’t even bother