Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

Their “HQ in Hungary” is also just a shell company for tax purposes, this game is full on Russian Bias/propaganda, and yes, they do hate China as well. Even when they were paying their employees, they were using a different shell company every month lol.

Honestly if only you knew, fun fact: if you see a lot of bug reports get outright denied or never looked at, it is because Gaijin has currently restricted actual TMs from reviewing them, because of a certain past employee (you can look his case up on reddit, it is very recent) :P

People who defend Gaijin, are straight up blind.

2 Likes

Oh I know that, that’s just lame excuse to avoid obvious accusations.

Well nothing new, remember when we used to chat on old forums, exposing their faulty treatments and implementations while developers was actually forced us to communicate with us?

Time flies so fast.

Well considering China buy their equipments and makes them better most of the time I’m not even surprised.

Oh I know him pretty well, his reputation proceeds him.

More like they know what’s going on but decides to stay silent because it benefits their Soviet fantasy.

2 Likes

modern smokes usually have chaff integrated, so i don’t see it being a problem

As for the LOBL, the devs could just decide not to implement it right now

That would be cool, I’m sure gaijin does have plans in place for upgrading brimstones to be F&F eventually.

giving them IR seekers would make them too strong due to missile quantity, nerfing the quantity is something gaijin would never do and more realistic seekers involves new game mechanics.

We all know how gaijin is with new mechanics

Brimstone missile platform doesnt have IR guidance.

It either uses MMW or SAL mode.

was a popular suggestion from people when they found out that brimstones weren’t F&F

Hence why I’m mentioning it

Not everyone has the skill level of esports players, just using them as example of a vehicle’s strength is counting only the upper limit of capabilities without considering factors that matter for players whit less experience and skill, i.e. Armor, tho its true that the bvm is at most the third best mbt as the leoa7, the abrams, but it doesnt make it bad

Brimstones are F&F missiles, thats why it has MMW mode in real life.

Unlike ir mode it doesnt get affected by smoke (unless you’re using spectral smoke) nor LDIRCM.

Yeah, I know this

T-80 is really just mid, that’s true.

T-90 is the bad one

T-90M is anything but bad, stop undervaluing this tank.

It has literally one thing going for it.
armour
that armour is negated almost completely by the terrible reload, mobility and depression
The round isn’t even anything special.

most maps in this game are CQC hellholes, the exact scenario in which good reload + reverse matter.
neither of which the T-90 has

2 Likes

I don’t get it. Anyone can argue anything they like it doesn’t mean they will be successful in their endeavor.

Chinese ztz Diesel tanks with -4 kph are basically the exact same thing. Higher Chinese tanks are even better than Russia ones but still have the same useless gun depression. Still nothing compared to Leopard or good NATO.

Wrong.

It has armor, survivability,awareness and decent combination of mobility and firepower.

Thats why you dont rush like a headless chicken in T-90M (you can still be quite agressive ir you know what you’re doing) nor try to use every single abusable map point.

T-90M requires significantly more skill level compare to average Russian tanks which is why most Russian mains complains about bein bad.

Leclerc, Chally-2, VT-4’s/ZTZ-99A-WZ-1001 and Strv-122’s be like: Get in line.

You can still find a good spot on those maps to avoid T-90M’s weakness, hell despite its weaknesses you can still brawl with it, 2 days ago I managed to get nuke with T-90M while playing as brawler, it works like a charm with proper advancing tactics and awareness.

The Leopard and M1A2 have better armor and more crew than the T90, the T90 gets 1 shotted at the side ALWAYS, whereas the other ones depending on how trolly the game is, may survive.

From the front the “weakspots” work 50% on Nato tanks and when they do, it’s mostly horizontal/loader kill.

1 Like

image
you can’t be serious

their rounds are equal or better. Their reloads are all better - giving them superior firepower (besides ZTZ-99)

both abrams and leopard 2 have superior firepower and armour + mobility combinations.
Merkava mk.4M is also good

T-80 is simply better than T-90 due to reload + mobility

1 Like

I’m serious.

It has good P/W ratio alongside with good acceleration but ofc you will be tunnel visioned to revers speed only.

No they are not better, only 122 has slight better penetration (10-15mm on 90 degree which doesnt change anything in practice).

WZ-1001 be like, not to mention aside from 122’s all of them has significantly bigger weakspots compare to T-90M which reduces their survivability a lot.

And where did mention those tanks in anywhere? Trying to strawmanning will not help you in this case.

According to you, everyone has different taste and playstyle.

2 Likes

Wt favours vehicles that have good mobility, reload and firepower over armour.

yeah, the reverse is the reason why the mobility is bad, you simply cannot retreat back into cover. The bad depression only serves to enhance that downside

Wt favors map/game knowledge, knowledge about vehicles and bravery.

Learn the difference

Only if you over expose yourself like an idiot.

Remember the first rule of survivability onion.

Again this heavily depends on map knowledge, learn which spots suits most for vehicles so you can stop complaining 24/7.

the superior reverse and depression of NATO vehicles literally is the first part of the survivability onion.

you don’t need to expose as much of yourself and can hide infinitely faster.

1 Like