I would report that guy for botting. Bro we all need to do our parts to maintain a better gaming environment for everybody bro
Spoiler
botting is a serious issue bro we can’t let this slide
1 Like
Challenger 2 's turret have 1/3 is green
Although BVM also 1/3 but BVM turret small
Defeat BVM turret difficult than Challenger 2
3 Likes
That is honestly what made me remember this player. Like, how is it even possible to do that badly in a 2A7?
I think I got mega triggered by my teammates so I checked some of them out, which lead me to find this absolute gem of a player.
1 Like
They are roughly equal if we consider zone above gun level because this is what will be exposed in hulldown. Also keep in mind weakspots will be smaller with bigger inclines in landscape (from observer pov). And challenger will be able to shrink them better due to better gun depression angle.
Yes this is Challenger 2 only one advantage , also T80BVM only one weak
I think because Leopard 2 have been too much nerf , so that it performed weak
Not only that, chally gets better reverse, reload and aps (which stops even apfsds) on black night. Also almost forgot about spall liners, those can save you from inaccurate shots
In return its gets much worse gun handling (31/11 vs 40/40) has worse forward mobility, limitied faster ROF and bigger weakspots.
Honestly its a pretty fair match up, one is depending on armor and forward mobility that can push for CQC combat while other one can basically deny enemy push in proper hulldown position, sadly most maps aren’t suitable for long range engagements.
2 Likes
Even with all the nerfs, the 2A7 specifically is still an hilariously easy tank to play.
It’s almost impressive that people manage to go negative in it.
Insert Superior German Engineering.
1 Like
I mean if you are a mechanic looking at an audi engine
Those are highly sophisticated and well engineered engines which require certain amount of knowledge and sensivity.
casually roll into a normal shop for lower fee which also unlikely
I wasn’t the one who brought up experience anyways, I just pointed out that the person bringing it up (here) wasn’t even qualified by their own logic.
also is that an ai image lol
Yeah it’s not exclusive but it just so happens that Russian stuff has the most of these types of features and players experience the ost frustration dealing with Russian especially t series tanks. It’s really not hard to grasp.
3 Likes
Well it isnt really that hard to grasp that that structural armour under a certain thickness doesnt generate spall… which is the point that i was adressing when he asked “why no spalling after penetration?”.
CR2 is slower to peek is more televised, it has got a little better with the buffs.
The top of the turret roof is a one hit kill and the TOGs system hit will most of the time take out the gun/breach.
CR2 is not hard to kill hull down.
But it will reverse to safety faster due to better reverse speed.
Same goes for t80 but it has lower chance to survive due to having less crew. Plus if we talk about c2bn (same br as bvm), c2bn has aps which can intercept apfsds. So c2bn will be saved multiple times while t80 will have to receive every shot.
Neither is t80.
I disagree a CR2 is one if not the easiest tank to kill hull down. The turret roof is angled and will catch a dart, T-80BVM turret roof will not it will bounce off it.
Yes you can reverse down the hill faster, while you at best have a damaged breach but likely have 2 dead crew and a breach to repair.
T-80 BVM has smaller weak spots on the turret face and a stronger barrel/breach assembly with breach shots from L27A1 maybe you disable the breach likely you dont. Any penetrating rounds spall is unlikely to kill any crew members and allow the T-80 BVM to repair a damaged breach.
No CR2 BN has APS standard CR2 and E model do not and on most matches the CR2 BN APS will save you from an ATGM not a dart unless you get a large enough map.
Name me on spot of a hull down t80 that pens 100% without being pixel perfect