Again it does if the game isn’t representing the armor correctly, so your saying that you dont care if the Tiger II gets 10mm of frontal armor in its upper front plate?
So you’re saying armor is the thing you rely on while playing T2H ?
2 Likes
Real question is who aiming at the Tiger 2 UFP anyway… 10mm would not make any different unless your aim is shit and you can’t be bothered to learn common weakspot or even flanking
Thats what i was talking about exactly xD
their “internal testing” is 100% sure truthfull and works like that
NII STALI internal testing is “wrong lies advertisment bias”.
Weve been over this already. Look at the ownership structure in the russian MIC vs the one in Germany and theres your answer.
I remember that, but that still doesnt quite justify such. Especially when most of the sold machines only see garrison duty.
Yes it does. The BMVg has no reason to lie on behalf of a private company not delivering on their contract. The situation between government agencies, independent oversight and private companies is a completely different one compared to russia which is why people question the credibility of russian statements regarding capabilities more than the ones from democratic countries.
1 Like
Yeah, why would a company lie to their buyers to cut costs and earn profits. That never happened, never throughout history…
Oh wait.
2 Likes
??? Ofc private companies lie but thats exactly what the job of the internal testing Jεcka mentioned is. To test whether said private company really delivered on their promises and that test is done by a government agency with independent oversight and no direct ownership of said company. The same cant be said for anything russian. I dont know why this is such a hard concept for you.
4 Likes
Yeah you’re delulu
It’s BMVg’s JOB to ensure the promised capability is delivered, if it isn’t, they will reject the product until is complies with requirements.
That happened to the F-125 class frigates, for example…
4 Likes
SAY THE WORDS BOY
Holy self report.
1 Like
I never said that to be clear. For the last time, I just want armor modeled correctly in a “realistic game”. Please stop making stuff up that I didn’t say. Also you didn’t even answer the question.
Superior German armor vs virgin Chinese round. /s
Which is why most maps are urban small maps, truthfully your gun depression is a nothing burger the same with the NATO hump.
If youre gonna disagree with me at least explain why.
Is it ?
5 degrees when compared to 9 or 10 degrees of gun depression feels like a night and day difference.
3 Likes
Russian MBTs are pretty easy to one shot.
LFP and drivers hatch are easy kills most of the time if you have a decent dart. T-80s and T-72s are also some of the easiest tanks to kill when hull down.
I agree that the TT BMPT is waaay to survivable to a stupid level, but the T-series MBTs are hardly anything special in terms of survivability.
3 Likes
And ? so are western tanks. if they arent one shot they are completely imobilised by losing horizontal and engine. Meanwhile russian tanks only lose their autoloader, and if they have a round loaded they can shoot back. Especially going against russia, ive had times my sepv2 is completely immobilised by a 2s38, one shot going through and taking as mentioned before horizontal and engine. russian tanks just like every single tank in the game can be one shot, but personally i think they have more survivability from what ive mentioned above.
But yeah ill agree BMPT is stupidly busted, every shot i do on that thing it generates practically no spall.
2 Likes