You got like 16 of the 179. It is def better for SAM.
A massive cope then. It require set up to stay in the air long in order to kill a SAM while the 179 can spam until a SPAA is dead. Also not mentioning the time require to keep a lock long enough for the Vickh to hit the SPAA , during that time another SPAA would have shot down your ass
Really dont understand the mentally of trying your best to make the LMUR the best for all possible scenario. Sure it is strong but trying to make the 179 look like a water pistol against it is just fucking pathetic
179 VS Pantsir SM
LMUR VS VT1 ADATS (only 5 teams have VT1 ADATS)
lmao what can I say . Unless gaijin fixes the correct downing of helis by the ARH MSL at some
That factually doesnt change anything, as “russian bias” is usually “i cant now spam AGM65 without thinking” or “i cant shoot it anywhere to pen it” :/
And at the message you answered, he exactly spoke of the “crew” talents which isnt in fact an advantage for USSR top tier.
We may have seen different videos, but i dont see much fatal explosions happening with it tho.
Try doing it and see what will happen… I will give you a hint - enemy SAMs will intercept your missiles (maybe not all but most of them) and you aswell.
and as soon as they started, the devs added IRIS, SAMPT and others. Yes, quite like so.
Tho you missing the point: USSR has two planes spamming Kh38s at the BR 13+. NATO has quite ALL the planes 10.7+ spam AGM65s.
Had them spam when the only SPAA was Tunguska.
I don’t understand …You are confusing the concepts, NATO is no 2 mach cas wepon, but Rus have and Rus 2 mach cas wepon sp just like the NATO 0.9 mach cas wepon
This is unfair OK?
This has nothing to do with whether NATO SPAA can or can’t stop them
It may be, i understand what you come from. I would be the first one to vote for the removal of Kh38s as well as any FNF munitions added. But the common answer on the AGM spam was “USSR can intercept”, so it DOES have many things to do with wherer can NATO SPAA intercept.
