Minor nation with smart players
1 Like
The issue with the IRIS-T is that it can’t defend itself as well against enemy munitions (You also have to defend 3 vehicles instead of 1)
Missile maneuverability doesn’t matter much when the enemy doesn’t even see it coming
Yes, FlaRak is quite bad. Now tell me something I didn’t know.
I find it interesting because you have only used the HQ11 once yet you claim that the CS/SA5 is only your backup anti air?
I also don’t understand how you would use the HQ11 to deal with helicopters while they are immune to ARH missiles
I can also cherry pick certain months to use them as arguments
1 Like
FlaRak is in a steady decline, but feel free to use global stats on a vehicle released in 2020 to prove something in 2026.
This one is steady incline I guess and not decline
December 25 stats tell that we should nerf adats:
1 Like
Interesting that in the same time frame the SL per game is steadily increasing. Kinda shows that the Pantsir is not great at killing planes now but seems to do well against A2G weapons
1 Like
Falcon main? 279 main? cherry picked unbalance tanks main like you?
JK love you bro
Actually it matters considering most top tier planes equipped with MAW nowadays and even then any smart pilot will instantly launch its payload and start to defend.
You’re talking about best case scenario for CS while completely ignoring that you’re not the only one who can think and play properly.
ADATS getting carried by it’s AT performance.
They are not, got killed so many times by ARH missiles in my helicopters and killed Ka-50 with my HQ11 in my first game.
First and only game, just because you got lucky once it doesn’t mean you can consistently perform well in it (or that the vehicle is good)
Im wondering what carried flarakrad all the way to autumn 2025
According to sl per game pantsir barely loses to 12.7 iris and clearly wins vs claws 12.3. Deserved 12.0 br yesyes
1 Like
Strange, nobody talks about not penning top tier NATO armours.
But only complaints top tier RU tanks have trolly armours.
Must have been the wind
First you claimed helicopters are immune to ARH missiles and I proved that you’re wrong.
Now you’re saying I only got that kill because I was lucky? How can I be lucky if helicopters are immune to ARH missiles in the first place?
Seems like you’re trying to find more excuses for your empty claim.
And yes HQ11 is a platform better when it comes to dealing with enemy CAS while CS is better for helicopter attacks, engaging with drones and clueless people.
But someone complained about nato survivability which caused turret baskets and blowout panels nerfs
Like Russian mains says: aim better buddy.
Hover / staying in multipath altitude makes them immune to arh. And helicopters are pretty good at that task