So as expected, at best “just trust me bro, I totally have 2K games in these tanks”.
7 Likes
;) the account is in some chinese guy hands, i cant even type its name because i dont know what its. Its not mine anymore
1 Like
Wrong. Don’t use the armor analysis in the hangar to point out weak spot sizes and claim that determines a tank’s effectiveness. In a match, they’re not just standing there waiting for you to kill them. When some flat-designed Russian tanks move across the map with their driver’s ports and lower frontal plates exposed, if you happen to be driving a tall, weak spot-riddled tank like the M1 or Leopard, it’s obvious they have a much easier time killing you while on the move. While you’re aiming at my weak spots, I’m already shooting at you—because I don’t have to worry about your ERA swallowing my APFSDS round. For me, the only advantage of driving NATO tanks comes when I go hull down, using gun depression to snipe with only my turret exposed. Either nerf the magical performance of ERA, or give me the M829A3, and I’ll stop crying 😭.
Leo2a7/strv122 are better at this task btw
1 Like
Explain real quick why we only have Russia is OP threads?
KH-38
MI 28
Bmp-t
Then look at Russian win rates despite every Russian main here making out the T series is the worst tank and the BUK sucks and Pantsir isnt even good.
That’s the classic WT bad players circle jerk of 0.5 KD experts validating each others lol terrible stats but infinite confidence.
5 Likes
You’re talking nonsense, repeating the same things over and over. Isn’t this game just a hobby for everyone here except the managers? I’m at work right now, and I wasted my first and second tea breaks on you because of your idiotic rambling.
Why you still here then?
The classic ‘‘My other account’’ argument.
You also just admitted to breaking the EULA. I’d suggest removing that portion from your reply given that it can lead to your account being banned.
And going by that logic, I could also claim I have a mysterious 2nd account in which I own every NATO MBT, and they are on a minimum of a 10 - 1 K/D ratio and 90% winrate.
Does that magically win the argument for me? Or does the ‘‘muh 2nd account’’ argument suddenly seem less convincing to you as well?
I’d be happy to take a quick look at vehicles which both of us play:
Your M1 Abrams: 47% winrate, 1.4 K/D.
My M1 Abrams: 71% winrate, 6.3 K/D.
Your IPM1: 48% winrate, 1.7 K/D.
My IPM1: 74% winrate, 5.8 K/D.
Your T-34/85 (D-5T): 64% winrate, 1.8 K/D
My T-34/85 (D-5T): 57% winrate, 3.5 K/D.
Your M18 Black Cat: 52% winrate, 1.3 K/D.
My M18 Black Cat: 64% winrate, 3.3 K/D.
Your Tiger II: 53% winrate, 2.2 K/D.
My Tiger II (I don’t have the SLA 16 so I’ll just combine the other three which I do own): 57% winrate, 3.9 K/D.
Your M36 GMC: 53% winrate, 0.9 K/D.
My M36 GMC: 61% winrate, 3.7 K/D.
7 Likes
go ahead and report me. Do you want me to mark some mod? here its @Stona_WT
pointing i havent played a vehicle and i shouldnt talk about it also dosnt win any.
these are my less played vehicles. I play mostly around 9.3-10.7. all them recently spaded during BMPT.
I barely use the armor analysis in general lol. Everything I say about the T-series armor is based on in match experience.
The T-80s, T-72s and T-90A all have weakspots on the hull and turret that (while smaller than a lot of their NATO counterparts) are pretty easy to hit and abuse, especially in combination with their weaknesses.
The T-90M is a bit better protected and more trolly when it comes to turret, I’ll give it that.
The T-90M is mid, the T-72B3A is bad (probably the worst tank above 12.0), the T-80U(s)/T-80BVM are still decent-solid, the Pantsir is still good for what it is.
No matter how much you rant about the MBTs, they aren’t better than that. You struggle against them due to your own issues which warps your perspective.
3 Likes
No, that’s a valid point. The quote “Grass is greener in the other side” is valid for this situation since most people pointing out Russian bias don’t have the vehicles they complain about. It is: most, some will have but are not certainly the most radical people there.
Which by the way you, @Necrons31467 bringing valid argument you constantly shifting views validate their position even more, it’s not stupid. Just give the data and information of the supposedly Russian bias and I can guarantee half of the people that says it doesn’t exist will shut.
5 Likes
First, this screenshot is not even valid since i wasnt pointing any experience with the vehicle, but showing a video of it just ignoring side shots. If you guys gonna just act like i havent played it, then it just doesnt make sense
absolute out of context bullshit
Just 2 cents to think about: Ofc people that benefit from unfair treatment are less likely to complain about it and its mostly people that dont benefit from it that complain.
Theres 10 trees in this game. The grass doesnt seem to be greener on the other side its greener on one of 10 sides so maybe just maybe theres some inkling of truth to the complaints.
It’s good to know that you acknowledged the issue: You don’t have experience with the vehicle and even so keeps shouting Russian bias. Explosive reactive armor is indeed incorrectly modelled in-game, some overract to shrapnel when they don’t other’s that should’ve protected or protect a lot: for example Kontakt-1 absorving >50 Kg of explosive, the few moments T-72AV (Turms-T) survives to an air-to-ground missile is due the Kontakt-1 absorving that damage, and is more than obvious this is a in-game mechanic issue not bias.
since you have only read the first line of mine, im gonna stop here.
90% of players in this game are awful, their opinions can be discarded.
Meanwhile, the top 10% of players which are actually knowledgeable, play numerous tech trees and have good stats never seem to be the ones that believe Russian Bias is a thing.
What a coincidence /s
7 Likes
Completely valid I can’t lie, nor I can’t argue. But I’m waiting to see someone complaining about eastern design flaws and some gremlin comes to save the day saying that they shouldn’t worry and it’s all bias, jokes aside, yes, the “grass is greener in the other side” since the guy in the other side doesn’t complain the same amount.
Yeah i agree that most complaints are pure cope coming from frustration which naturally is directed at the tree you play most against.
Of course you do.
2 Likes