I tell you this you guys keep bringing up T90M this while 90% of the time (10% is wallet warrior match) you guys spawn t80s and rush the map dies spawn Heli/Cas
I killed a lot of leopard 2s, abrams, lercler with no sweat dropped
But ur RU tanks some how survives like nothing happened
Other NATOs main out there also said the same then was I the only one who has problem with RU tanks?
1 Like
doesn’t it also have 3rd Gen thermals while Leopard 2A7V uses 2nd Gen thermals? or both have 3rd Gen?
Some do some don’t, but for my game with my screen at 1080 I’ve never seen a difference between 2nd gen and 3rd gen.
yes, u’re the only one complaining here.
also u can’t relie in NATO players for their excuses about “russian bias” and everything cuz they will always want Russia to be nerfed in anything, but “OOHHH NOOO USA CAN’T GET A NERF CUZ IN THAT CASE IS RUSSIAN BIAS CUZ GAIJIN ENTERTAINMENT LC. IS RUSSIAN AND THEY WOULD NERF USA TO MAKE RUSSIA BETTER”.
truly, stop crying about russian players and PLAY RUSSIAN TANKS, u will see how bad they’re in general.
i have been playing with the T-72B3 “Arena” and honestly it’s not bad at all but it’s weak asf, literally 1 single shot to ur carrousel and u’re done. the only way u can survive is if the enemy is stupid or u hide ur LFP with something (and even in that case u’re still vulnerable to driver’s port shots, which are hard to do, but not impossible at all).
2nd Gen is a bit blurry (slightly blurry) while 3rd Gen is like normal view but grey and white (thermal vision colors).
annoying but still killeable.
easier to kill, free food.
not that good.
very good but still there’s certain tanks which are a bit better.
literally a premium T-80U with slightly better ammunitions and mobility.
very good, but not OP.
very good, but not OP.
literally MiG-29SMT in an extremely high amount of steroids, nothing special.
1 Like
I have 9 of the 10 in game tech trees at top tier for ground, which include all NATO alligned trees except Sweden.
T-80s/T-90s have far from that much control if the NATO team has at least 2 braincells, which is part of the problem. Major nation mains just suck on average, and 2 of the 3 major nations are NATO.
The average minor nation mains aren’t that special either.
2 Likes
No you’re not, you’ve never played it.
It is not.
You can’t count on teammates.
I play NATO top tier.
I think you’re talking nonsense.
You have the British T-90S and your stats in that (negative winrate, barely 1-1 K/D, below 1 K/M ratio) are already showing me what to expect when you’d play the T-90M.
4 Likes
Dont hide behind T90M please… the lobbies flushed with T80s, Cas and helis
I can see one stat with T80BVM with no line up still able to get over 60% win rate.
WT content creator, you can watch all day not even the thumbnails but they actually play ru tanks to tell you how much riddiculous it is
I’m curious if Russia’s WR for Feb will be better than January due to the BMPT/Arena.
It’s not even a question, win rate for the top two ranks for russia ground is gonna be so skewed by BMPT/Arena. This is not a causation, but a correlation I found that most matches I have we lose against russia. Not saying this is russian bias, but a pattern I experienced. Br below 10.0 did not have this problem.
vErY gOoD, bUt nOt oP
1 Like
su34 is a better cas, radar wont matter in cas battle.
if its air battle, rafale still wins in fm performance
1 Like
LOL what a joke, u can’t relie in most of the WT content creators, most of them only show the good matches (which are like 5 out of 27 matches they played, even sometimes they play for days just to show a few matches in 8mins of video).
Once you’re at a certain level you’ll get several matches that, while once in a month to a .6 Gamer God, you’ll experience on a daily basis.
The thing is that when you are at this point you achieve that regardless of the vehicle you play as long as it falls in the norm of useability, getting such a match in a leopard 2 will be an order of magnitude easier than the Katyusha.
When a CC is saying that he just plays a couple of hours to get his footage, he’s not the one doing the lying per say, that falls to the people that believe that they can achieve the same result as long as they do the same thing he does, tt’s more dishonest in the sense that they never bother to explain the what/why/when/how that goes behind every moment of gameplay. Either consciously, or not.
The more interesting thing about CCs, and good players generally is to see how their vehicles perform relative to one another, eliminating second guessing wether the vehicle or the guy playing it is cheeks.
Of course you’ll always have the people that fall back on the cope that they always play a specific nation with their screen turned off, while drunk, and asleep to justify that they don’t have 10k/d.
2 Likes
Doesn’t mean they are right and that is what is being missed here. Russian mains will not admit their tanks have every advantage they shouldn’t have in game. From map design to how overlapping plates, ERA to if a system exists and if it functions like it should in game.
Russia get the benefit of the doubt every single time.
Where is their advantage in reload, shells, depression, reverse, reaction times, gun handling, tech, mobility, etc.?
you dont have enough playtime to back this off and its easily demonstratable by thousands not even hundreds of clips
Russian tanks have nothing to do with russia being good and are honestly complete garbage bar t80bvm which is passable at best
What is op is kh38mt lmur and pantsir and mb buk in tandem with said pantsir on big maps where planes cannot approach it safely
2 Likes
Advantage in armour ---- Best armour pound for pound in the game but it shouldn’t be and that’s the advantage. Meanwhile NERA is useless in every way.
Reload rate ---- Yes fixed reload rate no ready rack delay and no detriment should a crew member die, and the gun automatically reloads while the crew member is replaced. Now with buffs the standard Russian reload rate is equal to none premium crew skills. Gaijin should use an average and as they will not use range times, ideal conditions for Western tanks they should extend the courtesy to Russian tanks…Russian tanks T-72 and 80 do not consistently shoot at 7-6 rounds per minute they have to rotate the carousel for the next round. Not modelling this is an advantage.
Turret baskets ----None modelled on Russian vehicles that are proven to have them, no hydraulic systems modelled, in a tank as cramped as a T series tank you are going to lose systems from a penetrative hit that’s if the ammo doesn’t detonate killing the crew.
Depression ---- yes that’s a good one so Gaijin just removed hills or made them steeper from maps to stop Western tanks abusing hull down positions.
Reaction times? — Clicking the mouse is your reaction times
Gun handling — some of the best on the 90M and T-80BVM compare it to a CR2
Tech ----- well again Russian tanks should be using outdated by todays standards, copies of the Thales Thermal systems the Leclerc now uses a sight a generation ahead of what the T-90M is using in game though the T-90M has better or equal sites. New T-72 ARENA can intercept SPIKE missiles yet we have no concrete proof with most of the test footage showing shallow angle threats, SPIKE and Javelin would be presumably outside ARENA interception window.
Ammunition ---- 3BM60 is probably joint 2nd best round in the game
Mobility ---- Not having a reverse speed does hurt the T-90/72 series, the rest is great fast acceleration, no loss of speed when turning.
1 Like