because you clearly have no idea how limited russian tanks are
you just assume that they are op and meta because you suck ass at the game and have no idea on how to counter them
1 Like
I still have no idea why Chat Banned players are allowed to create posts ?
In game chat and this forum are both official ways of communication for WT, so if you’re deemed too extreme to talk on one platform, it should transfer to all other ones within the scope.
@Necronomica
Sorry to bother you but are you able to tell us more about this ?
The in-game punishments and the forums punishments operate independently. If you have not broken the rules on the forum then there is no reason for them to be punish here, if they can behave and remain civil on the forum despite any possible in-game behaviour that resulted in punishments there then why also punish them here? (You would be surprised how many that write to me in PM’s that are perfectly civil and nice despite their in-game chat history)
Just because a player might have issues controlling themselves in-game does not automatically mean that they will have the same issues on the forum. Reversely there are things they could get punished for on the forum that they would not be able to be punished for in-game (for example images or documents).
Ultimately it’s up to the community to report/flag anything they believe to be against the rules for each respective area and the corresponding moderators will handle those reports/flags in accordance with the rules.
2 Likes
Breaking rules in the game chat by constantly using slurs and stuff like that would get you suspended from the forums as well. Two platforms are connected, as shown by our profiles that track in game activity and whatnot, so shared punishments wouldn’t be that much of a stretch.
That is gaijin’s fault, not that of the ‘misinforming decadent NATO players’, they released a hideously worded changelog that didn’t reflect the nature of the change, and as a result it spread like wildfire
You are free to make a suggestion about that in the suggestion section. Currently that is not how it works.
There are way less grave things that also get players chat banned in-game.
Probably not that hard to implement on a technical level (but i don’t know).
My question remains; why?
If they break the rules in only one place why punish the other if they still behave there?
Also, we’re off topic, if you want to continue the discussion please do so in PM’s.
2 Likes
People like you still have no counter argument to the fact that the T series is the best MBT lineup in the game, yet you can’t ever stop talking about ‘how limited’ or ‘how bad’ they are.
1 Like
Which you did not make such a thing at all.
I stated “14 months” which means before any AAs came to other nations, it wasn’t useless at all infact it was the best and controlled the skies, this is a fact.
Russia is right now the best nation to grind with the best AA,best FnF, best air-to-ground missile…etc.
2 Likes
The idea that you need to own a tank to comment on it is dribble peddled by people like you, objective performance is irrelevant to whether or not I personally have put in the hours to grind a nation I don’t want to play for a myriad of reasons. Although if it helps you sleep at night… you can also point out a chat ban that results from the most minor of infractions adding up over 10 years of the game? 😂 completely irrelevant and smacks of desperation
1 Like
If i could politely ask, what makes them best in your opinion
1 Like
Because it’s simply something you made up.
You can’t make a counterargument for someones fantasy.
T-80BVM = good
T-80Us = solid
T-90M = mid
T-72B3A = trash
T-72B3 = mediocre-mid (it’s heavily bailed out by 11.7 matchmaking)
4 Likes
Small silhouette, speed(reverse speed lacks but mostly irrelevant when factoring in other strengths), gun/ammo performance, pre and post-pen survivability, overperforming ERA, .50’s, smallest frontal weakspot profiles out of almost every MBT series in the game… etc.
3 Likes
And now i need to ask, have you actually played the vehicle to experience any of this (its not an attack its just a question)
1 Like
No but nothing I stated is subjective, it’s all objective fact. The only thing that can really be argued is the extent of detriment the reverse speed has.
I disagree, it can be argued, because mobility is a pretty big aspect of a tank, and the t-series mbts dont really have that over other mbts, reversing can be important to reload and get behind cover, and the russian mbts entire side of the tank is a weak spot
4 Likes
If T-80BVM is a one-man-army, then yes, it can be considered as line-up, however T-90M (which in my opinion is better than T-80BVM) is publicly disliked and T-72B3A had its introduction unexpected and eventually also disliked for a battle rating 12.0 vehicle without the standard extra protection packs. Every line-up can be versatile (which in my opinion France’s is the best, specially with the latest addition) just like Soviet’s can offer, so I don’t think that’s a good counterargument since most of the “Russian bias” discussions are involved around a specific vehicle or specific characteristics (like: “Why it wasn’t destroyed”, “Why it’s so OP”, etc.).
I’ll say again and will be repeating it until someone brings concrete proof of Russian bias, or even better, any kind of preferential treatment for every aspect in the game (whereas we can confirm if is there any bias handhelding Rafale C F3 when vehicles like Eurofighter 2000 is underperforming according to the community), the whole part of the community that advocates that Russian bias doesn’t exists can be completely dismantled (which I believe the same people that do so will agree) by the moment someone brings proof of its existance, until then we’ll be fighting in this nonsensical discussion.
2 Likes
Earlier in this thread I documented how I hit the side of a BVM centre-mass and it didn’t kill, because ERA absorbed most of the impact and therefore it only took out the autoloader. He could then snap the turret onto me and kill me. I would find you the replay but it’s buried now, point being: every tank is weak from the side, but T series is absolutely the safest in that regard.
3 Likes
I highly disagree there, but im not gonna get into a prolonged argument
4 Likes
That’s a whole other argument that has many points to be discussed, they’re not relevant to the thread so I’m not gonna discuss them
I will say that you’re wrong. Proof of Russian bias is actually the goal for every party involved in this decade long discussion, it doesn’t need any argument because with concrete proof, is there really anything to discuss except skeptical people doubting the source? Except from that I’d be okay with proof and capability to replicate it in-game (something that could reduces doubts even more).