True, so the easy solution is stop calling it fake and demand sources everytime it’s beeing talked about.
Or you can just stop calling it that every time, knowing people will bite.
Why would i stop calling a fake weapon fake? And trust me NO ONE is demanding sources, theyre completely unasked for.
Yeah, no
We’ve recognised that it’s extremely dubious and will continue to question that until it’s removed or balanced
You are the one complaining about topics derailing because of it, yet you and others keep calling it fake here and fake there and expect no reaction ?
Make it make sense.
3 Likes
Because calling it fake is just descriptive it does in no way request anyone to send the brochure for the 100th time.
You’re basically asking people not to discuss it at all. Using accurate words isn’t a bad thing.
Is this wording more to your liking?
The ostensible existence of the Kh-38MT missile remains profoundly dubious, its provenance shrouded in a miasma of conjecture and unsubstantiated assertion. In the conspicuous absence of corroborative empirical data, technical documentation, or credible evidentiary substantiation, continued acknowledgment of this putative munition constitutes a disservice to both scholarly rigor and epistemological integrity. Accordingly, it is incumbent upon any curator of military historiography or aeronautical armament taxonomy to expunge this apocryphal artefact from the corpus of recognised weaponry with all due deliberation and decorum.
4 Likes
You can be sassy all you want, if he complains about it beeing talked about, then stop bringing it up.
Not a hard concept really.
2 Likes
Im not complaining that people talk about it, im complaining that calling it fake immediately prompts some loser to throw the brochure in your face when that discussion is not part of the thread.
Easy fix, stop baiting them.
1 Like
Being correctly descriptive is not baiting. If i say: the fake KH38MT is broken. They can just say: the very real KH38MT is not. Its literally more work to pull up the screenshots
1 Like
So you are saying you are not willing to formulate your post to not be potentially escalating, but then are shocked when it does escalate…
Well whatever, i leave it at that.
1 Like
Just to be clear what you’re asking for.
Are you asking for
A) The kh-38MT not be be discussed at all
B) it can be discussed, but no using naughty words like fake
C) it can be discussed but no refuting of the mockup photos
2 Likes
I am not asking for anything, i am telling you what you can do to prevent what the other guy is not happy about.
I don’t care if this thread gets closed, so be my guest for whatever you want to talk about.
AKA a media suppression tactic, that sees public discourse silenced over claims that it’s so ridiculous to disagree that said party must be delusional or misinforming
Ofc you don’t, because then nobody will question the suspicious nature of RU top tier in this day and age, and you’d be able to keep abusing it.
Yea sure, i think you dropped your tinfoil hat Elsa.
2 Likes
Let’s hark back to my previous point
“…silenced over claims that it’s so ridiculous to disagree that said party must be delusional or misinforming”
Nobody has ever explained why the Kh-38MT even needs to be in the game now, the ML laser guided version with GNSS and LMUR is pretty much the perfect combo for Russia. Which is akin to PARS + Brimstone of Germany.
There is absolutely no reason to keep the IR guided one anymore since LMUR is just a capable and it is the perfect replacement for it, and with the WR of Russia nearing 60% there absolutely needs to be something done.
People always cry that Mavericks have been in the game since forever, but will never acknowledge how inferior they are to Kh-38s, a subsonic, non lofting and no IOG capable missile will never compare to the sheer absurdity and overkill that Kh-38MT is.
5 Likes
I dont know man i dont see it as my job to suppress my language, because some people cant contain themselves from becoming off topic
1 Like