Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

because it being fake makes the whole situation even more stupid. If Russia was just good in top tier, because Gaijin screwed up the timing of the addition like they did with the Rafale that would be bad enough. But russia being broken, because Gaijin added fake shit is spitting in the faces of the players of other tech trees that have to work insanely hard to get the slightest bug report accepted.

4 Likes

I understand what you are saying.
But stop complaining about people bringing up whatever they believe is evidence, when you keep bringing it up everytime lol.

1 Like

Refuting what people post isn’t complaining.

It’s part of the debate process. You don’t have to engage with it.

It coming up all the time is exactly what I was talking about. It’s a double standard and destroyed top tier balance. of course it’s going to keep coming up. It’s inevitable.

You forgot the part where one party denies all sources as propaganda while offering literal state media for their counter argument

4 Likes

I am not, i am saying that that is the main reason these threads keep derailing. Because debating whether its real or not is not part of the thread. You can read the word “fake” and not engage with it by posting brochures.

True, so the easy solution is stop calling it fake and demand sources everytime it’s beeing talked about.

Or you can just stop calling it that every time, knowing people will bite.

Why would i stop calling a fake weapon fake? And trust me NO ONE is demanding sources, theyre completely unasked for.

Yeah, no
We’ve recognised that it’s extremely dubious and will continue to question that until it’s removed or balanced

You are the one complaining about topics derailing because of it, yet you and others keep calling it fake here and fake there and expect no reaction ?

Make it make sense.

3 Likes

Because calling it fake is just descriptive it does in no way request anyone to send the brochure for the 100th time.

You’re basically asking people not to discuss it at all. Using accurate words isn’t a bad thing.

Is this wording more to your liking?

The ostensible existence of the Kh-38MT missile remains profoundly dubious, its provenance shrouded in a miasma of conjecture and unsubstantiated assertion. In the conspicuous absence of corroborative empirical data, technical documentation, or credible evidentiary substantiation, continued acknowledgment of this putative munition constitutes a disservice to both scholarly rigor and epistemological integrity. Accordingly, it is incumbent upon any curator of military historiography or aeronautical armament taxonomy to expunge this apocryphal artefact from the corpus of recognised weaponry with all due deliberation and decorum.

6 Likes

You can be sassy all you want, if he complains about it beeing talked about, then stop bringing it up.
Not a hard concept really.

2 Likes

Im not complaining that people talk about it, im complaining that calling it fake immediately prompts some loser to throw the brochure in your face when that discussion is not part of the thread.

Easy fix, stop baiting them.

1 Like

Being correctly descriptive is not baiting. If i say: the fake KH38MT is broken. They can just say: the very real KH38MT is not. Its literally more work to pull up the screenshots

1 Like

So you are saying you are not willing to formulate your post to not be potentially escalating, but then are shocked when it does escalate…

Well whatever, i leave it at that.

1 Like

Just to be clear what you’re asking for.

Are you asking for

A) The kh-38MT not be be discussed at all

B) it can be discussed, but no using naughty words like fake

C) it can be discussed but no refuting of the mockup photos

3 Likes

I am not asking for anything, i am telling you what you can do to prevent what the other guy is not happy about.

I don’t care if this thread gets closed, so be my guest for whatever you want to talk about.

AKA a media suppression tactic, that sees public discourse silenced over claims that it’s so ridiculous to disagree that said party must be delusional or misinforming

Ofc you don’t, because then nobody will question the suspicious nature of RU top tier in this day and age, and you’d be able to keep abusing it.