Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

So in a hypothetical conflict, what is superior:
The Leopard 2A7V, IRIS-T SLM & EF-2000
Or
T-90M, BUK-M3, Su-30SM

Well the original question of the topic is already answered so its kinda whatever

1 Like

The rusian trio wouldn’t even be enough to wipe the floor with, just dust some shelves

Well I’m curious what ‘mr unbiased’ has to say about it

IRL? probably the side that has more numbers and that can produce the most of these machines

6 Likes

Since this is a game, i don’t see the point to answer such a ridiculous question.
Thanks for confirming that i am right, you are obsessed.

6 Likes

Watching you i have feeling that im in some kind of matrix, glowie.

Not enough it should be deleted.

You proving my point.

Why deflect, it’s a fairly easy question, just pick a side, I’m not asking you to justify that or anything

See, this is your problem. You don’t have to pick a side.
The world is not a white box with ones and zeros, there goes a lot more in answering such a question, hence no point in it.

1 Like

Ok you’re scared to admit that the german side would perform better, gotcha

Lmao, if that is what you take away from it, go ahead if it makes you happy.

1 Like

Except totally wrong.

  • the Russians invented the helicopter
  • Mi-4 was literally out the same year bro calm down with your mis-information campaign.
  • the American helicopter industry was so bad that they had to steal a Hind to reverse engine it to make better helicopters.
  • 1986 KA-50 was leagues ahead in its design, while being not only safer for pilots, sturdier than any other helicopter of the time. Hence why the Russian Mi-24s were nicknamed “the flying tank”
1 Like

This is the kinda crap that polarizes people and makes them biased into one side.

1 Like

I never back tracked once. Man, you cannot read clearly.

1 Like

I mean we would have to ignore a lot of things that make Germany Germany.

1 Like

This is disconnected from irl logistical or political limitations, just purely a deathmatch between a set amount of both on each side

1 Like

The usual rusian wewuzery
{82904119-3E6D-4CF8-A94F-92D3DE8E9A50}
Even if you consider him an inventor of heli, which as it usually is, kinda wrong?

7 Likes

Ok you gotta explain that one, because that is a wild statement.

I mean one side is a media and research landscape made from 32 countries with generally the lowest corruption and highest press freedom in the world the other side is one country with insane corruption and abysmal freedom so i dont really know how someone could not be biased towards one side.

Oh so you stick by your misinformation?

1 Like

The Vs300 right? The one made in America by Igor Sikorsky, a Ukrainian-American.

Also wasn’t there limited rotorcraft employed by Germany during ww2?

If we want to go even further back, wouldn’t the French hold that title?

2 Likes

It really depends on how you define inventing. You can throw in early china and Davinci for concepts for vertical flight. The term helicopter is french for a reason. Youve got early italian concepts. The first practical rotorcraft is spanish. The first real controllable helicopter is a Focke Wulf from germany. Sikorsky did the first mass produced. Its really hard to pinpoint exactly who invented it which makes his statemeant all the more ridiculous

1 Like