Can you elaborate?
So we never saw Kh-38ML being used ? And they are both from one modular platform missile ?
Funny how you project onto me what you do.
So you can demand secretive data to prove their point but if we demand same thing from it’s suddenly becomes unreasonable ? I think it’s called double standarts
Can you find any evidence Fakour-90 being used ?
Not to be that guy, but Whisloy basically only exclusively plays Russia:
Outside of that, he also has US vehicles, but he never really played anything below Rank 7/8 of the US.
He will never agree to anything that makes Russia even a slight bit worse.
3 Likes
Funny that i never commented about should Kh-38MT be in game or not
And rusia never told that it exists.
Try playing your word games somewhere else.
1 Like
Why ? It’s perfectly working here
Im almost completely sure that Iran at least tested it and they acknowledged that it is in mass production which is already more proof than we have for the KH38MT
Which makes it fictional.
Just like T-80U is a real thing but Swedish T-80U is complete fiction.
And im some what shure that Kh-38 has been tested and adopted in December 2012 at least news articles suggest that
Can we see this news article?
1 Like
The Swedish T-80U was extensively trialled by swedish forces on swedish soil, and there is over half an hour of avaliable footage that demonstrates this.
The way Kh-38MT function in-game is also fictional. Its recognition range is abysmal due to its sensitivity, this is what a thermal camera with 250mK sensitivity looks like for example (Russian AGAVA):
MTs “seeker” has sensitivity of >270mK according to their very own brochure for the ‘missile’, MT should not be able to perform as well as it currently does and if using the missile’s seeker for target search, you should be seeing nothing more than blobs.
For comparison, this is <50mK - 25mK camera (i.e actual 3rd generation)
GEN 1 thermals are better than MTs seeker is supposed to be, yet in WT it has a 3rd gen seeker…? lol.
4 Likes
It lists the same stuff as rosonboron? There is nothing concrete like an image or video in said article
You see, their way of thinking changes often and they haven’t applied any rules that haven’t already been broken by now. For example, Ho-Ri production is a 7.3 TD and Japan already has a 7.3 TD in the Type 99 and also have some other vehicles to fill up the ~7.3 BR. This thing wasn’t needed for years now but it’s still here.
That “trialed but not ordered” category is complete BS specifically made so they can copy paste more of the dubious stuff to cut their workload. T-80U under Sweden is fiction, simple as. Same as Pakistani Oplot.
None really ?
Japanese fiction alone already more than justifies 38MT and MA.
1 Like
Oh sorry they didn’t think that some guy from future in some game forum will be braging about it’s existance.
tldr: they don’t have to.
And start getting into context.
1 Like
And ?
Just because I made a hour long test drive of a car doesn’t mean that car is mine. That’s some absurd logic you’re using.
Until you can show me some procurement documents I think we can agree T-80U under the Swedish flag is complete work of fiction.
1 Like
Erm, they should be able to prove it’s existence if it’s in mass production right, by your logic?
It’s gaijin’s logic not mine.
I didn’t choose for it to be in game did I