It’s just slightly above middle of the pack, but if someone can barely make an uparmored Leopard 2 work then it’s not suprising that they struggle against a BVM.
4 Likes
Cause most tanks dont get spall downwards from a dart.
You can wipe the crew of a BVM through the top of it shock horror, due to the low profile.
Personally? For faster turret traverse tbh.
Find it helps quite a lot as well.
But yeah expert crews also help with mobility forgot about that.
Is what it is man, i used to blame the bvm years ago as well until I finally took russia up to the T80U .
Then i abandoned it for 2 years nearly only got the bvm before august.
And so better with the Vt4A
Chine is also getting AH64E, russia has always been 1 or 2 steps above the rest in game
Two steps in what? Isn’t everyone getting it?
Sure T Series tanks have a denser crew position but in the current situation most penetrations are a functional kill so the weakspots you mentioned are pretty universal
2 Likes
Universal to what ?
The survivability of T series is dog gone awful, my point is you can even kill them with a dart shooting the top of the tank unlike say leopard or abrams.
Germany had PARS far before anyone.
Russia and usa have been some of the last to get ir agms
2 Likes
64e has to be researched, then the missile has to be unlocked at bottom of tree. Mi28nm got lmur free…no unlock.
Oh no, you have to play the game to get something.
1 Like
In all fairness, they weren’t always IR guided. For a year straight they were laser guided because of balance issues, made IR (and for a patch they were objectively busted), and then gaijin nerfed them into the ground to the point they became better Ka-52 killer than tank busters (lol).
The fact we have LMUR now and Gaijin is still doing nothing to unjack the PARS from the artificial nerfs they applied to it back in ~2021 is astonishing… then again the 2A7V still has nerfs that date back to the 2A5s introduction back in 2019 haha, and its own artificial ones…
I don’t remember them ever being laser guided. Post where you found that. As far as I ever knew, upon their introduction, they were IR. And spammed worse than anything else.
Also, you can’t say “artificial nerfs” with no context.
Easy to see you did not play back in 1.91 then…
Also, you can’t say “artificial nerfs” with no context.
Again pretty easy to see you did not play back then, so how about;
- Leo 2s being the ONLY MBTs in the game with a secondary modifier for increased spall generation on their mantlets
- being the only MBTs with FCS forced elevation limits over their rear (all MBTs have this irl fyi)
- Gaijin refusing to fix Leopard 2s armor despite them knowing it should be much better and instead nerfing it :D
Post where you found that.
I don’t have the screenshot at hand, but Smin back then confirmed the LR were laser guided for balance, so here’s a vid from the dev server for now:
9:20, LR being laser guided
Can you tell what they did to nerf it? Just curious.
))))
Basically they made guidance shit tier, which is why it’s easy to spoof it (it should have much better resistance than the Kh-38MT due to the nature of their seekers but alas), and it’s missing a bunch of REPORTED features still.
I’ve been playing the game since the T-72a was top… the hell you mean I haven’t played??
What kind of drugs do you use? LMUR needs to be unlocked too, you’re crazy, you don’t even know what you’re talking about.
1 Like
If you did “play” i’m assuming you only cared enough about a single nation at the time lol
The fact PARS 3 wasn’t F&F when added at first and made semi-laser guided is known to most that played back in 1.91, and it was in fact given F&F BECAUSE it was so bad compared to other missiles that people just quit playing it til PARS were made IR guided.
But all ir agm have the same guidance.
I wouldn’t know how they are coded right now, the general issue here is that seekers (IR ones), have different levels of reliability when it comes to actually keeping a lock on a target, and they will generally, especially if they’re purpose made, be capable of keeping a lock on a target even if temperature changes.
PARS 3 and other IR F&F ATGMs are purpose made, they shouldn’t be losing lock if a tank drives next to something 1 degree hotter, and on the other hand we have the Kh-38MT which should basically be blind as its seeker is so sensistive a 0.01 degree difference would be enough for it to lose lock… the matter of how it’s even capable of locking a target is another issue considering the REAL seeker isn’t 3rd generation, and as far as I am aware, is BAD in terms of targer recognition and lock range.
I played several. Didn’t care about the game as much back then.