till haven’t answered me. Mi-28 has the same thing as 64E
I havent had a single problem with the ah64E so far. Because its 400k rp to get then another ~100k rp to unlock the JAGM, not 25 thousand on a previously added vehicle which most people already had spaded.
For every 1 Ah64E ive seen ive seen 10 Mi28Nms with LMURs.
38MT isn’t fictional.
It is, there was a plastic mockup in an arms expo thats it. There was a colossal thread on the “existence” of the MT which was inconclusive, having a mockup would not count as proof of existence for any other nation in Gaijins eyes. So why does it get a free pass?
To be fair Challengers are piece of shit in real life as well.
The combat record would dissagree with you but they dont particularly fit WTs meta. Doesnt help when they are artificially nerfed into the ground with how their steering is modelled sapping 90% of your speed doing a gentle turn, add in the dubious nature of how Gaijin have modelled the ch2s lacking spall liners, having the cmdr’s head in the hatch rather than lower down where it should be, the bullshit 4 round 1st stage ammo count, the TES kit not being STANG level 5 compliant despite numerous documents being sent proving it to be so.
Iconic tanks all come from major nations. I bet many more people heard about things like Tigers, Shermans or T-34s than Cromwells, Somuas and shit like that. Same goes for top tier, Leopards, M1s and T-tanks are much more known about than CRs or Leclercs.
You said people simply play major nations due to their real life popularity, which still doesn’t explain why USSR is so dominant unless the playercount is being boosted by Russian players which you yourself denied. Abrams, CR2 and Leopard are more notorious than T-Series for modern combat, and Tiger/T-34 is on equal playing field for WW2-era. If we are basing nation playercount on vehicle notoriety then Germany would be top place, somehow USSR is still above them.
Unless a prototype has proof of function it should not be added to the game. No other prototype equipment has be added to the game without solid evidence that it works. Do we just start trusting random piece of paper with “prototypes” on them now? No we dont and shouldnt, yet a fake missile is allowed into the game and to dominate the toptier of the game.
Ah the usual useless combat records against non-peer vehicles. Amazing.
A combat record that spans its deployment through to the active Eastern european conflict against peer vehicles, a combat record that would indicate that its at least as good as the other European vehicles delivered.
I don’t get the hype of Soviets right now.
BUK-M3 isn’t a game changer though it will stop F-15Es and Rafales.
Mi-28NM will still die to SACLOS SPAA, and sometimes to ARH SPAA.
Soviet CAS is easily dealt with via SPAA systems.
T-80BVM is still an average top tank.
It also helps that the Eurofighter is a strong plane and British mains actually know how to play the game because we get shafted most of the time in the tech trees. Hell, we have some of the worst planes at 9.7 and the global average WR for Britain 9.7 is 50.8%. Our 9.7 spread:
Hunter F.6
Harrier Gr.1
Harrier Gr.3
Jaguar Gr.1
Not a single one of those is an overpowered plane in any way, and the Gr.3 is competent because it gets CMs, despite it not being able to dogfight it can at least survive the missile spam. But the Jaguar? Terrible dogfighter, Harriers? terrible dogfighters, the Hunter F.6? Decent dogfighter but every plane at 9.7 it faces is faster than it and it sees 10.3 a lot so you have to play it like a Vampire that cannot turn.
people always say this, but they dont realize that pantsir was added the patch after f16, if anything it is proof of some bias by the developers because after one patch where russia is at a disadvantage they get a new vehicle that absolutely blows everything out of the water
while at the same time it takes years until anyone else gets a system with comparable effectiveness
they have had the best heli since LDRICM was added and it got even better this patch
even before that point it was the best heli without fire and forget missiles by a lot
and for around a year they have had by far the best CAS planes in the game, to the point where all IR guided ATGMS were nerfed because of them and this patch they changed how spawn point costs were calculated also because of them
The Soviets didn’t get a new medium/main tank for 15 months.
They didn’t get OP CAS for 3 years while my NATO tech trees had OP CAS.
The Soviets finally, finally for the first time ever get an equal SPAA to NATO tech trees that’s useful against top CAS.
The last time a Soviet vehicle was buffed was Su-27, and it corrected its flight model to be accurate; Soviets haven’t been buffed since. Mig-29 is still chronically wrong in dry thrust fuel consumption and flight model due to wrong thrust curves after being in the game for years.
Rafale is the most buffed vehicle of all time. Before that even F-15s were buffed more than Soviet vehicles.
The way wing-rippnig works now benefits NATO aircraft, especially F-15 and Rafale.
@Spidd124
AH-64E, Mi-28NM, and Z-10ME is not Russian bias.
AH-64E is also the best of the 3.
My favorite tech trees are treated better than the Soviet tech tree.
