Soyuz might be necessary addition, but it was extremely easy to tune it in order to match it’s peers but they didn’t, instead they made a monster out of it.
LMUR would be perfectly capable without realistic lofting, same as 38MT without awesome optics and/or IOG.
That’s the problem I was trying to highlight.
Gaijin survive off of people’s money, so more profit makes the forum less important.
You’re basically voicing your many concerns with the game in the worst and the least important way to Gaijin and then you act surprised why Gaijin isn’t listening to feedback made here.
Maybe but the question is not if they would be capable, the question is if they would be strong enough to offset the shortcomings of the other parts of the ussr tree
Im not surprised at all. I just told you repeteadly that the game itself and its problems are not negatively impacting me enough to use measures that would actively reduce my fun. Or put simpler, voicing my concerns in the forum doesnt deprive me of anything, not buying the pack would.
This is like choosing to use a peashooter instead of a machine gun to fight off an assault. As I said, community has all the power over Gaijin but they forfeit it for some odd reason.
Forum rants are useless as shown by Gaijin ignoring most of it.
Those other shortcomings can also be tuned to make them up to par.
Voicing your concerns on the forum doesn’t deprive you of anything, but it’s also pretty useless as it’s a completely wrong angle to attack if you want major changes in the game.
Can they tho? Can you realistically tune their tanks to be more competitive? Would the MI28NM be as good as the 64E if its LDIRCM was realistic and JAGMs lofted correctly? Would russian CAS be competetive without the KH38MT?
I am aware of that but like i said, i dont think the state of the game is so bad that id want to engage in things that might be more effective but would also hamper my enjoyment of the game.
Why should that be different for other players? 2. Its purely anecdotal
Better players lol. Because of the insane amount of Fans of the USSR navy? Usually more played means worse players on average.
Literally every 8.0 gun is great for killing bots, because theyre bots.
Or maybe Soyuz performs better, because its by far the best BB? Which would also explain why you completely ignored the component part again, since you cant really argue against that. Sometimes the obvious answer is the true answer and you dont have to pull some obscure, unlikely reason out of your backside
Your argument: “nu uh”
My argument: provides actual data.
I’m not pulling any reason out lol. The best “on paper” ship is the Yamato.
Funnily enough it has the worst kd rn.
Maybe botting has returned?
But it’s funny you said:
Meaning you agree. Wow. Maybe your finally seeing common sense?
If that’s the case I guess the German players are by far the worst, yet in my experience both the German and American players are the worst when it comes to literally any game mode.
Do I need to get the Bismarck / Iowa / Yamato to prove that they are just as capable if not more so?
Just as when I got the fox nerfed for its over estimation of turret drive, purely because it was far more powerful than people let on?
Or the T58 how everyone continued to tell me “it’ll be fine at 8.3! Well balanced! Not OP at all because no stabilizer!”
Meanwhile my kd in the T58 is a 4.268 right now… my highest kd vehicle ever. Certainly higher than anything Russian. So what does that tell you?
??? I compared the Soyuzs components to its peers you just said “its cuz of bots” with no evidence whatsoever lol. The Yamato would be good with bigger maps that dont make its diamond armor into a shot trap.
I do not. Its just a stupid argument since thats completely unproven anectodal evidence. Maybe Soyuzs kills are all players and Iowa is all bots, then Soyuz is even stronger.
And by my experience USSR are equally bad. Thats why anecdotal evidence is useless. Funnily enough thats all you Soyuz defenders have.
You can read the stats and see that they are not.
That the T58 in underBRed? No idea what that has to do with Soyuz tho
Although being vastly better than the Ariete… it has worse performance why is that? Players, players that can skew stats.
Therefore your argument is kinda pointless.
3rd
The T58 has to do with the SovetSky, because you have the perception the ship is OP when it isn’t, versus people have the perception that the T58 isn’t OP when it is.
I get that. YOU JUST DONT GET THAT THERES NO REASON WHY SOYUZ WOULD BE THE ONLY BB WITH A SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER NUMBER OF BOT KILLs.
The Ariete has 1/10 of the games and is a minor nation. Soyuz is played a lot and is also a major. So that complete argument is bollocks
No one who’s not a us player thinks that the T58 is balanced just like no one who’s not a ussr plater thinks that Soyuz is not the best bb.
You are just as biased, the difference to me is that I have objective stats and the objective comparison of its components that you still didn’t comment whatsoever
So when I get my Iowa, and prove you wrong, I will loveeee to see that reply. In fact, I’m going to bookmark this.
The stats and comparison… the SovetSky has more HE filler likely due to the explosive compound. That’s really the only difference I see. Yamato has the most pen and armor, and the biggest guns. So no I don’t see your point there.
