Yes it is, which is why we’re having this conversation.
1 Like
Doesn’t thar show his voiced concerns aren’t that relevant as hes already given the justification to gaijin to continue what they are doing .
Man the world used to be simpler.
Btw this went from talking about russia in grb stomping to the naval calling card.
So what you said about lemus they get to loft and ve fire ans forget, while brimstone has to stay artificially nerfed into the ground?
I really hate all top tier helis rn man unless you have a LWS your inherently at a disadvantage
1 Like
100% agree
Maybe but the question is not if they would be capable, the question is if they would be strong enough to offset the shortcomings of the other parts of the ussr tree
Im not surprised at all. I just told you repeteadly that the game itself and its problems are not negatively impacting me enough to use measures that would actively reduce my fun. Or put simpler, voicing my concerns in the forum doesnt deprive me of anything, not buying the pack would.
This is like choosing to use a peashooter instead of a machine gun to fight off an assault. As I said, community has all the power over Gaijin but they forfeit it for some odd reason.
Forum rants are useless as shown by Gaijin ignoring most of it.
3 Likes
Those other shortcomings can also be tuned to make them up to par.
Voicing your concerns on the forum doesn’t deprive you of anything, but it’s also pretty useless as it’s a completely wrong angle to attack if you want major changes in the game.
Can they tho? Can you realistically tune their tanks to be more competitive? Would the MI28NM be as good as the 64E if its LDIRCM was realistic and JAGMs lofted correctly? Would russian CAS be competetive without the KH38MT?
I am aware of that but like i said, i dont think the state of the game is so bad that id want to engage in things that might be more effective but would also hamper my enjoyment of the game.
Kinda of like shouting at someone else for shooting yourself in the foot mentality
I remember when this post was about Russian teams steamrolling NATO
2 Likes
Part and parcel of many online communities sadly.
1 Like
Ew no.
Keep nations with similar equipment together. Or don’t add 10 different versions of T-72 for everyone to use…
1 Like
Most boring and annoying
TLDR
My stats in the SovetSky. 88%~ of my kills are bots. I purely only killed people who fired at me first.
SovetSky has more kills than its peers because likely:
- It has more matches
- It has better players
- It’s SAP round is very nice for killing bots.
- Why should that be different for other players? 2. Its purely anecdotal
Better players lol. Because of the insane amount of Fans of the USSR navy? Usually more played means worse players on average.
Literally every 8.0 gun is great for killing bots, because theyre bots.
Or maybe Soyuz performs better, because its by far the best BB? Which would also explain why you completely ignored the component part again, since you cant really argue against that. Sometimes the obvious answer is the true answer and you dont have to pull some obscure, unlikely reason out of your backside
Your argument: “nu uh”
My argument: provides actual data.
I’m not pulling any reason out lol. The best “on paper” ship is the Yamato.
Funnily enough it has the worst kd rn.
Maybe botting has returned?
But it’s funny you said:
Meaning you agree. Wow. Maybe your finally seeing common sense?
If that’s the case I guess the German players are by far the worst, yet in my experience both the German and American players are the worst when it comes to literally any game mode.
Do I need to get the Bismarck / Iowa / Yamato to prove that they are just as capable if not more so?
Just as when I got the fox nerfed for its over estimation of turret drive, purely because it was far more powerful than people let on?
Or the T58 how everyone continued to tell me “it’ll be fine at 8.3! Well balanced! Not OP at all because no stabilizer!”
Meanwhile my kd in the T58 is a 4.268 right now… my highest kd vehicle ever. Certainly higher than anything Russian. So what does that tell you?
??? I compared the Soyuzs components to its peers you just said “its cuz of bots” with no evidence whatsoever lol. The Yamato would be good with bigger maps that dont make its diamond armor into a shot trap.
I do not. Its just a stupid argument since thats completely unproven anectodal evidence. Maybe Soyuzs kills are all players and Iowa is all bots, then Soyuz is even stronger.
And by my experience USSR are equally bad. Thats why anecdotal evidence is useless. Funnily enough thats all you Soyuz defenders have.
You can read the stats and see that they are not.
That the T58 in underBRed? No idea what that has to do with Soyuz tho
You clearly don’t get that:
NAVAL KILLS REGARDLESS OF BEING AI / PLAYERS ARE COUNTED AS PLAYERS NOW.
There is no way to tell how many players / Ai have been killed and to merely assume its all players is just a terrible point.
2nd
I can read the stats and say “wow, stats! If only they were all based off of one person to get an accurate reading of all the vehicles!”
The problem with stats is you can get really great or really bad players in them.
For example, the abrams.
Vs.
Although being vastly better than the Ariete… it has worse performance why is that? Players, players that can skew stats.
Therefore your argument is kinda pointless.
3rd
The T58 has to do with the SovetSky, because you have the perception the ship is OP when it isn’t, versus people have the perception that the T58 isn’t OP when it is.
It’s called bias, and you have it.
4 Likes
I get that. YOU JUST DONT GET THAT THERES NO REASON WHY SOYUZ WOULD BE THE ONLY BB WITH A SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER NUMBER OF BOT KILLs.
The Ariete has 1/10 of the games and is a minor nation. Soyuz is played a lot and is also a major. So that complete argument is bollocks
No one who’s not a us player thinks that the T58 is balanced just like no one who’s not a ussr plater thinks that Soyuz is not the best bb.
You are just as biased, the difference to me is that I have objective stats and the objective comparison of its components that you still didn’t comment whatsoever
So when I get my Iowa, and prove you wrong, I will loveeee to see that reply. In fact, I’m going to bookmark this.
The stats and comparison… the SovetSky has more HE filler likely due to the explosive compound. That’s really the only difference I see. Yamato has the most pen and armor, and the biggest guns. So no I don’t see your point there.
2 Likes
Please do.
18mm more pen 15kg less explosive filler on a 56mm bigger gun lol. Diamond shaped armor with a shot trap just next to the 70% bigger magazines. Yeah Yamato is truly a beast compared to ss lol
Laughing this thread still exists. “Russian teams” barely if any at all, seen any matches where ive seen russia face against just nato countries. But if anything in sim ground, China n Rus dominate to the extent i suppose there could be an argument for them, but thats also due to a large factor of players lacking situational awareness and ability to last longer than 2 mins and have actual SPAA/Anti cas(Jets) lineup.
Think ground sim needs to remove that simple “1000 sp” you get at the start, and make it simply like grb, but hey ho. They dont care abt simulator battles much anyway