Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

If they wanted just balance they’d tune the vehicles to be in line with others, not giving them outright best things. Did USSR need Soyuz in it’s current state to make them balanced in Naval for example ?

I won’t vote because it doesn’t matter.
If everyone that think Gaijin is making awful decisions that hurt the gameplay thought about it for a second, I believe we’d be playing a much different game now.

People don’t realize they have all the power in the world over Gaijin, as they control both things Gaijin simply need to survive, engagement and money.

2 Likes

Once upon a time, a marine opened an MRE in the Middle East… and he had crayons in it… and decided to take a bite.

At least that’s the story I was told. When I got to my unit

3 Likes

I stock ground the AIM I didn’t find it that bad at all. Just use your brain, and the tank works

What doesn’t work are the teams who 1 life, in which I blame youtubers

3 Likes

I still don’t get how people think the SovetSky is Op or broken. Please explain.

1 Like

lets make it easier why do you think that a ship with outrageous performance and objectively insane components is not broken?

Describe “outrageous performance” without using someone else’s regurgitated words. Because most people don’t understand how naval works.

And what is “objectively insane components”?

4 Likes

Outrageous performance as in its literal performance in the game is significantly ahead of the less played Iowa and completely eclipses the Yamato.
And insane components as in a gun with the same pen as an american 406mm but double the explosive filler. An armor thats supposed to be a thick cope solution due to the inability to buil rca thicker than 200m but in game we instead get full 400+mm of rca. Hilariously small magazines compared to its peers. The only thing thats not literally best in class is its AA protection.

That still isn’t anything really relevant. What makes you believe stat wise it’s the best?

Just because it has X quality doesn’t mean solely it’s the best

Also it’s easier to kill than Yamato and bismark

4 Likes

Because its stats are literally the best?

If said quality is objectively better than the same quality of its competitors then yes it does.

I would have maybe given you the second one if youre blind and dont know where the elevators are on a Bismarck but the first one has got to be a joke, you can one shot a Yamato in a full uptier without issues

1 Like

WHAT STATS??!? Show the stats!

1 Like

Also I’ve one shot all top tier bbs and have been one shot by them all


“UH those stats actually say nothing they include ai kills and are useless anyway since the playerbase is so bad and ussr players are just goated like the real ussr navy during ww2”

awesome, really useless bit of information though

2 Likes

Because it’s true…? It’s useless? Weird.

So lol you know they include Ai kills but bring up the stats anyways. Isn’t that the literal definition of bias? You hate is because it simply is?

WW2 Ussr navy wasn’t that goated.

Also HMS vanguard has a higher WR doesn’t it mean that’s the best then?

3 Likes

sure

Best armor
Best guns by a country mile

Worse mobility, but let’s not pretend it has any kind of impact in naval

1 Like

If you got one shot by every BB (therefore including the ones with limited penetration like Bismarck, Richelieu and Vanguard), you might want to change the way you play your Soyuz

What am i reading right now

I swear sometimes i wonder if you guys live in some parallel reality.

Bismarck you go for elevator, straight under the turret, fires spread downward, end of story

Yamato suffers from tiger P syndrome, nice diamond shape, you go for the plate facing straight at you and the gigantic ammo-rack take cares of the rest

I don’t really think that debate is on topic, but let’s just say you don’t find rubber in place of ERA on western tanks.

As for the rest, if russia was as good IRL as it is portrayed in game, one can genuinely wonder why they are not done with their “conflict that shall not be named” adventure.

1 Like

You can name it. And it became much more involved when half the world suddenly got involved.

1 Like

Best guns? Debatable.
Best armor? Not really.

Half the world ?

The whole western supply is in eastern Europe now ?
Not even talking about “human resources”

I mean i’m sorry but we are back to the “parallel reality” square

1 Like

Unpopular opinion, the game is getting too difficult to balance between the teams at top tier. I think they should just mix all nations together, just like AB.

So nations with OP weaponry will feel their own pain.

Please no, mixed battles are the most boring thing ever

3 Likes