Russian Teams Steamrolling NATO - Top Tier is Broken Again?

No trust

Show the latest 13.0 GRB games wins VS losses against Russia pls

1 Like

Can’t bet it when you don’t have any to begin with bro

7 Likes

I want to still expose the russian bias without being put on hold this week, so I’m not gunna respond to that.

1 Like


The top mission playing as the Soviets was only 6.0 the mission below it is ARB at 7.3.

The two American Matches at the bottom are an ARB match at 7.3 and Sweden wasn’t a top tier match either. Making Golden Quarry my only match in which my team won a game.

My British Experience (10.0 - 10.3) for February.
Only count NATO vs. Russia.
Key criteria: 12+ players using the Russian faction AND full Russia team. In games with 12+ Russian players, both my wins AND losses are included – since UK gets MM’d with everyone.
Results: [Full] Russia: 4 - NATO: 4; [12+] Russia: 31 - NATO: 15
Grand Total: Russia win rate is 65%. :D

Somebody exposed it with data mones on the thread suggesting russian tanks need buffs. Ill copy it.

Basically. Gaijin had hidden armor models around breach, autoloader to disappear spall, trimmed down russian breach hitbox when they added trunnions, etc.

They are lying to their player base by adding these things without publicly disclosing them and making them invisible in the protection analysis.

This doesn’t impact ALL russian tanks, and not all of them have the same shadow buffs being applied.

This is proven on his post with datamined screenshots showing values that gaijin has intentionally hidden.

If this kind of thing isn’t worth the treatment that gaijin got a few years ago that hit their public reputation… then I don’t know what is. Lying to your player base and gaslighting them is a serious issue.

8 Likes

Just for the record, the screenshots themself are from the Community Development Kits’ (CDK) Assetviewer thus not datamined per se as its an official tool provided by gaijin.

Technically speaking, you can also use nvidia ansel (which some of the pictures were made with btw) to look inside the vehicle ingame to see armour values and types (just that its really and I mean really annoying to get that thing to actually show armour-info).

However, for checking whether a plate actually creates spall and to check how thick a specific plate is/what exact armour type it uses, datamined values are ofc much more convenient and imo just as, if not more reliable (datamines are literally our changelogs atp).

Nevertheless, they’re still not visible though “normal means” and not available to any player Independent from their their platform and thus reasonable to be considered as hidden.
(e.g. console players cant use the CDK, AMD or Intel GPU users cant use nvidia ansel etc.)

2 Likes

I appreciate the breakdown. Regardless, gaijin is dpong something that is INCREDIBLY deceptive and they’re gaslighting a huge chunk of their player base.

Its kind of messed up.

Yes, this is really sad.

Add to that new pantsir with a missiles that penetration increases with distance… ;)

Why is despite what Russia gets, the nato players always complain about something Russian. It’s a joke as old as time.

The new pansir isn’t going to kill anyone unless they’re 1200+ meters away.

Well you cant really complain about a NATO addition if they dont get anything

Isn’t the USA getting like 6 vehicles this update? Japan’s getting 3-4?

What new levels of bias have you achieved?

US is getting 3, Russia is getting 3.

That’s my point though. Everyone gets something. I don’t see why people complain every update.

Was just pointing out the numbers.

I only glimpsed over TECs cus about the dev stream. A lot of them looked USA based.

I wasn’t trying to be accurate

Ok let me rephrase: Cant really complain about anything NATO if the stuff they get is so terrible that youd rather pity them than complain
Its not like anyone is complaining about the Mig29

That’s a terrible take.

I love the Stryker.

And there’s nothing worse than getting another MiG-29 to research… all for R-73s…

1 Like

How is it a terrible take? Why would you be complaining about something thats just not good?
Or not noteworthy at least

2 Likes