Bruh what even is this. A fact is a fact, it doesn’t change at all. Whether you agree with said fact is another thing, but that doesn’t mean they are subject to interpretation.
If you actually mentioned how people use the word “fact” for non-facts often online to strengthen their arguments that would at least be an interesting discussion, but the quoted part is pretty ridiculous.
Any BR ＞ 10.3 was destroyed by the BMPT. It only needs a small slope to be invulnerable. I really don’t understand why there is a “probability of sympathetic detonation” for the ammunition rack that runs through the vehicle body. Gaijin symbolically added that “sympathetic detonation would destroy the breech, fire control system…” But when both ammunition belts explode, hahaha, it becomes empty there. The BMPT continues to fire. An empty rack is firing. How ridiculous! They could have upgraded the 2S38’s turret ammunition belt to have a “probability of sympathetic detonation” as well.
easy fix is to remove turret baskets
It’ll never happen, more likely is everyone gets baskets eventually.
People can take AIM-120-C5 range and inteprit it as best missile in the game which is wrong solely facts could mean anything interpretation matters a lot.
So if i say all black people have let’s say lumbago and because of that their opinion must be disregarded it wouldn’t be racism ?
Thats called ignoring other facts and making wrong assumptions. Missile has other parameters besides range.
Yeah that would be an opinion, not a fact lol. C5 has the longest range is a fact. C5 is the best missile is an opinion
What the actual fuck? russia player is not a race
AAHHAHAHAHAHAH
LMAO
Thats how intepretation works.
Seems to be it matters a lot then.
Well that’s why it’s called Russophobia not Racism.
No. Usually opinions should be grounded in facts but they are not the same.
Example:
„LMUR is op.“ is an opinion.
„LMUR is the only correctly lofting AGM rn despite multiple sources“ is a fact.
Saying:“ I think the LMUR is op, because it’s the only correctly lofting agm“ would be an opinion based on a fact.
Again where do you see russophobia?
There is no difference between this and AIM-120-C5 range.
Yes there is. Opinions are open to interpretation. Facts aren’t. They are 2 different things. Your C5 example is an opinion. Just as my last LMUR sentence
Yeah that’s not Russophobia lol
I literally show how presenting facts matters and you saying that is an opinion. If someone ask you do like orange will you answer them “It’s a fruit” ?
Back to this question then.
Yes because you seemingly still don’t understand what the difference is. Reread my example above it’s quite good.
So you’re really standing by the choice that comparing black people having a medical condition is a suitable comparison to checks notes people that play russia in a video game ?
What you are describing is an opinion or conclusion based on a fact (in isolation).
The fact still remains a fact, there is no interpreting it, it either has the best range or it doesn’t.
Familiar faces).
Nonsense. It`s so far-fetched rubbish…
AAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Nope. It`s one of the most pathetic missile of top tier.
T-72A definitely has some qualities over Kpz-70 that people might find useful though.
Literally show it as manipulation over a fact what you trying to disproove here ?
You really illitirate arent you ? Giving deragatory prejudgement to group of people based on their uniting charesteristics is basic for Racism/Sexism e.t.c. which is literally your statement.
MT version doesn’t exist aside from some mockups.
Please provide a source for this by showing us KH38 with IR seeker and also IR seekers specifications on 38 fuselage.
Which means it hasn’t tested nor deployed nor it has actual data on how it bevahes.
Even MIG 1.44 has more reliable data than KH38MT at this point.