16 vs 8.
KH-38 also exists, it has the ability to swap between multiple seekerheads and the seeker does exist, it just has not been mounted on the KH-38.
Yeah JAGMs, what about spikes? PARS? None of them loft despite first hand sources. Only LMUR does.
Citation needed. Also what is any of that worth if there is still 0 information about it
Left in the dust, Germany does need a new Heli, along with a few other nations.
Again, 16 vs 8. 16 lofting ATGMs would be stupid.
Its been sent in the KH-38 discussion a ton of times.
Its certainly worth something.
Your own words.
Facts are subject to interpretation. Interpretation can be manipulative.
Okay smart one let’s start devaluing opinion from people based on their race or gender. Oh no it looks like Racism, Sexism or Transphobia. Looks like it’s not only my “stupid” standarts.
1 Like
And that’s a reason why?
What kind of stupid argument is this? They loft irl so they should loft in game. It’s not much more stupid than 8 one shot missiles, because of how agm warheads work
Yeah a picture where it’s not clear whether it’s a mockup or an actual seeker with 0 further information. Great.
4 Likes
And how exactly does that prove that me calling out apparent double standards is politically motivated?
Cinema.
Yeah you’d know about those, wouldn’t you?
The difference is that people playing russia have a bias, if they say „the LMUR is not op“ it’s obviously not an objective statement. That’s why the opinion is to be taken cautiously not because of russophobia lol
4 Likes
Bruh what even is this. A fact is a fact, it doesn’t change at all. Whether you agree with said fact is another thing, but that doesn’t mean they are subject to interpretation.
If you actually mentioned how people use the word “fact” for non-facts often online to strengthen their arguments that would at least be an interesting discussion, but the quoted part is pretty ridiculous.
3 Likes
Any BR ＞ 10.3 was destroyed by the BMPT. It only needs a small slope to be invulnerable. I really don’t understand why there is a “probability of sympathetic detonation” for the ammunition rack that runs through the vehicle body. Gaijin symbolically added that “sympathetic detonation would destroy the breech, fire control system…” But when both ammunition belts explode, hahaha, it becomes empty there. The BMPT continues to fire. An empty rack is firing. How ridiculous! They could have upgraded the 2S38’s turret ammunition belt to have a “probability of sympathetic detonation” as well.
2 Likes
easy fix is to remove turret baskets
It’ll never happen, more likely is everyone gets baskets eventually.
People can take AIM-120-C5 range and inteprit it as best missile in the game which is wrong solely facts could mean anything interpretation matters a lot.
So if i say all black people have let’s say lumbago and because of that their opinion must be disregarded it wouldn’t be racism ?
Thats called ignoring other facts and making wrong assumptions. Missile has other parameters besides range.
4 Likes
Yeah that would be an opinion, not a fact lol. C5 has the longest range is a fact. C5 is the best missile is an opinion
What the actual fuck? russia player is not a race
4 Likes
AAHHAHAHAHAHAH
LMAO
1 Like
Thats how intepretation works.
Seems to be it matters a lot then.
Well that’s why it’s called Russophobia not Racism.
No. Usually opinions should be grounded in facts but they are not the same.
Example:
„LMUR is op.“ is an opinion.
„LMUR is the only correctly lofting AGM rn despite multiple sources“ is a fact.
Saying:“ I think the LMUR is op, because it’s the only correctly lofting agm“ would be an opinion based on a fact.
Again where do you see russophobia?
4 Likes
There is no difference between this and AIM-120-C5 range.
Yes there is. Opinions are open to interpretation. Facts aren’t. They are 2 different things. Your C5 example is an opinion. Just as my last LMUR sentence
Yeah that’s not Russophobia lol
I literally show how presenting facts matters and you saying that is an opinion. If someone ask you do like orange will you answer them “It’s a fruit” ?
Back to this question then.
Yes because you seemingly still don’t understand what the difference is. Reread my example above it’s quite good.
So you’re really standing by the choice that comparing black people having a medical condition is a suitable comparison to checks notes people that play russia in a video game ?
1 Like