none of my complaints change depending on my personal view of whatever country. Facts stay facts.
? You’re writing that devaluing the opinion of players based on what they play is phobic. Which is extensively stupid even for your standards. Especially since, again, the arguments of Kyoo and me don’t change. LMURSs lofting as the only AGMs stays stupid no matter what my opinion of russia is.
That would finally force devs to balance sp costs based on munitions performance. Nobody is paying almost 1000 sp for such garbage. Las hammers are much cheaper while being much better.
I complain that the LMURs are the only correctly lofting AGMs despite multiple reports. None of the other LDIRCM helis have that type of preferential treatment.
At least the hammers exist tho and their lock mechanic is loal which isn’t modeled in game
Facts are subject to interpretation. Interpretation can be manipulative.
Okay smart one let’s start devaluing opinion from people based on their race or gender. Oh no it looks like Racism, Sexism or Transphobia. Looks like it’s not only my “stupid” standarts.
What kind of stupid argument is this? They loft irl so they should loft in game. It’s not much more stupid than 8 one shot missiles, because of how agm warheads work
Yeah a picture where it’s not clear whether it’s a mockup or an actual seeker with 0 further information. Great.
And how exactly does that prove that me calling out apparent double standards is politically motivated?
Cinema.
Yeah you’d know about those, wouldn’t you?
The difference is that people playing russia have a bias, if they say „the LMUR is not op“ it’s obviously not an objective statement. That’s why the opinion is to be taken cautiously not because of russophobia lol
Bruh what even is this. A fact is a fact, it doesn’t change at all. Whether you agree with said fact is another thing, but that doesn’t mean they are subject to interpretation.
If you actually mentioned how people use the word “fact” for non-facts often online to strengthen their arguments that would at least be an interesting discussion, but the quoted part is pretty ridiculous.
Any BR > 10.3 was destroyed by the BMPT. It only needs a small slope to be invulnerable. I really don’t understand why there is a “probability of sympathetic detonation” for the ammunition rack that runs through the vehicle body. Gaijin symbolically added that “sympathetic detonation would destroy the breech, fire control system…” But when both ammunition belts explode, hahaha, it becomes empty there. The BMPT continues to fire. An empty rack is firing. How ridiculous! They could have upgraded the 2S38’s turret ammunition belt to have a “probability of sympathetic detonation” as well.
People can take AIM-120-C5 range and inteprit it as best missile in the game which is wrong solely facts could mean anything interpretation matters a lot.
So if i say all black people have let’s say lumbago and because of that their opinion must be disregarded it wouldn’t be racism ?
No. Usually opinions should be grounded in facts but they are not the same.
Example:
„LMUR is op.“ is an opinion.
„LMUR is the only correctly lofting AGM rn despite multiple sources“ is a fact.
Saying:“ I think the LMUR is op, because it’s the only correctly lofting agm“ would be an opinion based on a fact.