Chill bro, use a dictionary with that spelling cause you’re struggling
iif you’ve played the game enough you will realize how important its even .1 secs of difference for reload speed let alone some buffs like .2 or even a full .5 secs its quite a lot if time is against your odds
2 Likes
1 Like
Keep them at reserve
Not service related
1 Like
Unpenetrable UFP and cheeks its bad armor?? Go ahead and play merkava or ariete. Not even mentioning autoloader and fuel tanks eating sabots for breakfast.
Now the oOobroms also eat them for lunch bro
@MotorolaCRO I think this is perfectly normal as I heard Obroms are built for survivability so this is working as intended 👍👍👍
4 Likes
Bebrams have bad armor and any penetration result in a total vehicle loss.
That is if you trust forum experts.
5 Likes
I dont see the abrams fuel tank eating any sabot. It didnt get damaged. Also that neck shot spall didnt do nothing, and the fuelt tank didnt have anythong to do about it.
Thats a bug of no spall damage after pen that was ocurring recently.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7u6tkvri1feN
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hKdnuEj0FRdi
When I say autoloader/fuel tank eats sabot, i mean the component get destroyed but the sabot dissapears, meaning it will dont create any spall bc ot failes to penetrate that component. Which it shouldnt happen.
Round simply went through AIM without damaging anything.
That shouldn’t happen.
2 Likes
Stil has anything to do about what Im saying, for example the neck shot, what has to do with a fuel tank?
Autoloaders and fuel times sometimes deletes the sabot not creating any spall, not even visually. In your case spall was made but no damage, which its a different bug from what im saying.
1 Like
I’m talking about the first shot.
…
1 Like
Please tell me this is a troll post
1 Like
Yup, it shouldn’t disrupt APFSDS rods. It’s thick and strong, but no more than equivalent of 100 mm of steel.
1 Like
It definitely does, but only at angles. At a flat angle, it should not be effective against APFSDS.
bro thinks 0.1secs doesn’t make a difference, LMAOOOO.
fake, they’re some of the best well armored tanks ingame, with some of NATO tanks maybe being slightly better (Leopard 2A7V for example).
wdym?
lmao the 3BM60 is enough to one shot anything u hit if u don’t have aut*sm and have 2 hands with 5 fingers in each one.
only T-90M, T-80BVM has good mobility and it’s considered even better than the T-90M just for that.
Leopards struggling to reload against a T-80BVM be like:
it’s obviously non-existent cuz it doesn’t exist at all, it’s just bad luck, game failures/game trolling u, and if u believe in Russian Bias then u’re rather a kid, a new player, or an inmature adult (the worst one).
i could agree but with certain specifications, since i feel Russia doesn’t deserve anything else since their rank 7 tanks already perform very well at rank 8 (2S25M, BMPT, Object 292), but i would like to have more rank 8 tanks for my lineups since carrying rank 7 tanks feels a bit “odd”.
it actually would.
what else do u want, lol? T-90M has 3rd Gen thermals at the same BR as the M1A2 SEP V2, and the V2 only has 2nd Gen thermals.
skill issue, there’s plenty of flat maps in WT to favor russian tanks and if u get into a situation where u can’t shoot cuz u don’t have enough depression, then it’s ur fault for not trying to get a flat spot where to shoot at ur enemy.
actually does, better to have a 7secs reload than a 7.1secs reload.
ok then make all NATO tanks which are manually loaded have a 15secs reload so russian tanks actually can do something to their “very well armored” tanks (cof cof turret basket cof cof).
2 Likes
what do u want to fix from Ariete? armor?
1 Like
soviet ERA is ok, it’s just bad luck and RNG working and doing ur shot not pen.
pretty sure ur 120mm smooth-bore rheinmetall DM53 APFSDS doesn’t get absorbed by a side-Relikt that often.
Not really, simulations show that it really doesn’t do much.