You still seem to get very offended when anyone criticises the sloppy quality of RU equipment no?
People are only irritated at the state of Russia in game because their IRL sloppiness isn’t reflected, wouldn’t be so obnoxious is they modelled corruption in factories or supply chains would it,
Wouldn’t be very fun if your LFP fell off because the welds failed, and so on.
Both of those are fairly reasonable statements given all sources surrounding both
Except it wasn’t / isn’t?
Baozi called you out on it multiple times until you backtracked lol
In NAFO standarts
You are proving my point
If your point is that you and your friends are horribly biased then yes
yes? like you can read Baozis sources on the IMBT and mine on the DM73 and youve been wrong both times.
No in Having-a-brain-standards
Biased towards what? Proper, free, non corrupt, independent sources?
I don’t think so, you just like to make everything hostile.
I can acknowledge the equipment of both sides. I don’t have a horse in the race for either nato or the ussr, so i don’t need to rely on propangda of either side.
Unlike you:
Yaaawn…
How many times has this topic been derailed?
Horribly biased is the new term for factually correct?
Dm63A1 has an Anti-ERA tip quoted to negate the effects of KE ERA by up to 60%, allowing the main round to do the rest and then penetrate the composite behind, is it not unreasonable to assume that statement applies when KE ERA has proven ineffective in a certain combat theatre?
The KH38MT isn’t in Russian or Foreign arsenals, it hasn’t been fired from an aircraft, nor has it been carried by an aircraft. The arguments for it’s existence come from ‘it’s a modular missile’ and ‘the seeker exists’, so it’s existence is purely theoretical, when this was brought up, you decided to deny it, while offering no sources or evidence to the contrary.
Both of these are, as far as we know, correct assumptions, and they hold more weight than the defending parties due to sources, observations and history
So in a hypothetical conflict, what is superior:
The Leopard 2A7V, IRIS-T SLM & EF-2000
Or
T-90M, BUK-M3, Su-30SM
Well the original question of the topic is already answered so its kinda whatever
The rusian trio wouldn’t even be enough to wipe the floor with, just dust some shelves
Well I’m curious what ‘mr unbiased’ has to say about it
IRL? probably the side that has more numbers and that can produce the most of these machines
Since this is a game, i don’t see the point to answer such a ridiculous question.
Thanks for confirming that i am right, you are obsessed.
Watching you i have feeling that im in some kind of matrix, glowie.
Not enough it should be deleted.
You proving my point.
Why deflect, it’s a fairly easy question, just pick a side, I’m not asking you to justify that or anything
See, this is your problem. You don’t have to pick a side.
The world is not a white box with ones and zeros, there goes a lot more in answering such a question, hence no point in it.