Ok.
It would be risky if they would on side hits, especially on the turret, as the T90M’s net should force it into the ERA, more probably on hill side hit, if it was flat on.
Yes that also plays a role of course, I was referring to some of the videos that were shown of pend 90Ms, they occurred due to weak spot exploitation rather than poor armor.
1 Like
Four man squads can very easily dictate how a match goes.
I don’t have many aced crews either.
Yes it does, but rarely do I play in a squad of 4 typically duo. Nor do any of my buddies play Russia mainly because they tried it, either on my account or bought a premium, and they hated it.
2 of which were USA mains, 1 is a German main.
But again, playing with or without a squad didn’t increase my performances in either nation. The vehicle itself was the main point, in combination with how effective my team was at holding the flanks.
USA: I could score my kills, hold my own longer, but lose due to rushing / unintelligent teammates.
Russia: Score slightly less kills, but often have a team ready for a fight, and can mostly hold their own, unless they cannot out load / retreat if necessary.
So, in truth, if the USA teams didn’t one life, and the reload was 6.0, I’m sure the winrate would rise once again. But, I’m also willing to say an 5.75 USA abrams reload is feasible and would be a good value for ace crews.
The T-80Us should still get that buff I mentioned before, just to add more reason to play them.
And something has to be done for the poor T-90A, I thought the T-72A or B was bad… nope, T-90A is somehow far worse. Everything around it is super fast compared to it, in turret speed, reload, reverse, forward. Pretty much the T-90A has two “pros”: 3Bm60, and good turret cheeks, which the turret cheeks don’t even matter because it seems like no matter the weak spot, it always gets hit.
“Guys this spall liner composite box is actually really balanced, you’re a Russian cope poster if you think otherwise.”
3 Likes