I’m still missing the part where I’m supposed to care about the stats that you’re trying to stat-shame.
I just fact checked your claims.
You lied you have “2000 more battles” than that guy, so you have more experience, and i just pointed that out.
And you exploded
Yes, you have beend caught red-handed lying.
I told you numerous times that i am not, and i am telling you to not be so insecure about it.
Yes, you really look pathetic with your meltdown, but i still don’t want to insult you - i just value truth.
Quite the opposite, tbf
You tell me
Your posts show that you really care.
Anyway, farewell, i hope you will feel better soon
2 Likes
Also, nobody has even made any headway in combatting my argument in the thread that it’s Russian Bias.
Because it is Bias, and you folks know it, so you try either try to stat-shame or deflect or move the goalposts to try and discredit my argument. Yet you’ve all failed so all that’s left is for you IvanBoos to try and derail the thread hard enough to get it locked.
Doesn’t win you the argument, by the way. Just proves you guys are sore losers.
Well, if playing USSR means bad quality of game then your entire argument since is invalid, yourself is saying this. As I said previously: you own the T-55AM-1, you can easily research the battle rating 9.7 and battle rating 10.3 vehicles with ease.
Considering you have bought at least one high tier premium vehicle, you certainly have more than enough money to buy more premium vehicles you want. But owning them doesn’t means you have position to present this argument you made all the way to this moment and certainly prior to this moment to the future.
now i agree theres some bias here and there but i dont think its much of a problem, the thing is that gaijin nerf the xm578e1 and m735 for absolutely no reason (mbt-/kpz-70,xm803 and M60s) so now its less effective in terms of being competitive to the 5 mbts that u listed
But its fine really, things like AMX and OF-40 and 1As are build for speed, u dont wanna head on with those unless they appear out of nowhere infront of you so you either run quick or shoot weak spot(unfortunate, the T-xx are design for head on) so you flank and side shot or if u are quick then you shoot breech or lfp
And things like the 120S/AMBT can 1 shot all of those with M829A1/KE-W so thats a far trade of(im still pissed that they wont give the 120S the 1200hp engine because it doesnt exist when it was design to have it in the first place)
Because is simply pointless, your argument is so weak there’s no point arguing about it, like: “USSR has more vehicles in a specific battle rating. Russian bias confirmed!”, the best way to counterargument you is with a “No.”, because it doesn’t proof nothing.
2 Likes
So where in that did you even read that I said playing USSR means bad quality? The entire game of WT itself is bad quality, and so I mitigate it by playing it less than I used to. That doesn’t negate my argument - If anything it reinforces it.
If I own some of the vehicles I’m complaining about it absolutely does mean I have the position to make the argument I’m making. What are you smoking to think you’re good to make the nonsense argument you’re trying to make, here?
No, you’re just lost in your sauce of whatever substances you’re on because your arguments are fundamentally worthless and do nothing to counter mine. You should log off and sober up, first.
Yes, those rounds are artificially nerfed and need to be corrected.
Yes, and no. Mobilty means next to nothing because Gaijin keeps screwing the maps over and turning them into World of Tanks maps where we’re stuck with 3 lanes and nothing but head-ons. Also doesn’t help that Ivan armor is overperforming and Gaijin loves messing with the code for ammo detonation chance % so that Russia gets to say " Nuh-uh " when the ammo carousal gets hit often enough that it’s not even comical.
120S is a goofy vehicle that’s just a glorified tank destroyer. Least the AMBT can act like an MBT for it’s BR spot.
Lolmao. I don’t statpad.
Out of 105 respawns, I died 99 times.
Out of 107 respawns, I died 99 times.
Out of 125 respawns, I died 101 times.
Out of 109 respawns, I died 100 times.
If I was statpadding, I would not have died on 95%+ of my spawns. I play super aggressively, and pay the price for it.
In my opinion the XM-803 is far in a better position, the fact that still at battle rating 9.0 yet keeping similar performance to the MBT-70/KPz-70, shows how this vehicle can be user-friendly. Yet the ammunition doesn’t have the best values, it’s overshadowed by the armor and mobility. In other hand the OF-40 (MTCA) and AMX-30 Super has to use their superior ammunition and mobility to counter its poor armor values.
Yeah, sure, with less than 100 battles you have more than position for talking, pardon, mighty War Thunder player.
If my argument is nonsense is because you did in the last three hours and 112 replies to this thread. I have nothing to prove because you haven’t presented nothing in reality, I’m trying to convice you to use the T-55AM-1 and see by yourself if the battle rating 9.7 and battle rating 10.3 Soviet vehicles are indeed overperforming.
XM803 is an amazing tank in my experience, its just a bit different to play.
good hull down tank destroyer with a giraffe neck that can actually eat shells but speed of a turtle
eh true the M735 can pen ~350mm at insert distant(probably close range), M774 is correct because its just an improve M735 and XM578E1 should be close to ~310mm or Gaijin can give them XM578E4(which is better, slightly longer penetrator and 4 fins stablizers)which would give significant pen to it
and yes the M735 vs XM578E4 are extremely close
true its actually a really good mbts, it has speed, somehow better armor than the kpz and mbt
agree
Your argument is nonsense for two reasons;
-
Your english writing and comprehension skills are awful. Obviously, it’s not your first language but you make no attempt to clean it up to sound even moderately comprehensible. That’s your issue to fix, and nobody else’s.
-
You keep harping on about the 55AM-1 but it’s not even in the BR range I’m discussing, so you’re still way lost in your own sauce.
Go ahead, speak another language fluently.
Use it to grind 10.3 Russian vehicles you muppet.
2 Likes
how does any of this prove this so called “russian bias”? i honestly dont understand, having 5 mbts is somehow op?
what a fun thread with lots of civil arguing :)
6 Likes
Idk man i’m here for the 🍿
1 Like
ah yes🦅🇺🇸🔥🍿
It’s not a good hulldown vehicle because the breach is easy to disable and exploit to shoot into the turret ring if not the ring directly. The 120S is a very middlin’ vehicle that’s made awful by the lackluster line-up it’s part of. USA had some offensive power when the Abrams was still 10.3 but because the IvanBoos cried like little girls over an undermodeled Abrams that was and still is mid now USA is stuck with a line-up that has no offensive capability - Only defensive, meaning that Russia in many of the matches gets to just hold W, take objectives, and point and click on just about everything. It’s no balanced.
fair point
the M60 would be better if they make turret ring volumetric, fix the model, change the hydraulic
pump position like on the abrams(WHICH THEY HAVENT WHEN THEY MAKE TURRET RING IDENTIFIED AS TURRET BASKET, SOMEHOW) and give it the 1200hp engine like on the M60 AMBT(yes they have the same engine and engine deck expansion)
1 Like